Skip to main content
Log in

A full-scale field study for performance evaluation of axially loaded large-diameter cylinder piles with pipe piles and PSC piles

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the results from a pile load testing program for a bridge construction project in Louisiana. The testing includes two 54-in. open-ended spun cast concrete cylinder piles, one 30-in. open-ended steel pile and two (30- and 16-in.) square prestressed concrete (PSC) piles driven at two locations with very similar soil conditions. Both cone penetration tests (CPTs) and soil borings/laboratory testing were used to characterize the subsurface soil conditions. All the test piles were instrumented with vibrating wire strain gauges to measure the load distribution along the length of the test piles and measure the skin friction and end-bearing capacity, separately. Dynamic load tests were performed on all test piles at different times after pile installations to quantify the amount of setup with time. Static load tests were also performed on the PSC and open-ended steel piles. Due to expected large pile capacities, the statnamic test method was used on the two open-ended cylinder piles. The pile capacities of these piles were evaluated using various CPT methods (such as Schmertmann, De Ruiter and Beringen, LCPC, Lehane et al. methods). The result showed that all the methods can estimate the skin friction with good accuracy, but not the end-bearing capacity. The normalized cumulative blow counts during pile installation showed that the blow count was always higher for the PSC piles compared to the large-diameter open-ended cylinder pile, regardless of pile size and hammer size. Setup was observed for all the piles, which was mainly attributed to increase in skin frictions. The setup parameters “A” were back-calculated for all the test piles and the values were between 0.31 and 0.41.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abu-Farsakh MY, Rosti F, Souri A (2015) Evaluating pile installation and subsequent thixotropic and consolidation effects on setup by numerical simulation for full scale pile load tests. Can Geotech J. doi:10.1139/cgj-2014-0470

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abu-Farsakh MY, Titi HH (2004) Assessment of direct cone penetration test methods for predicting the ultimate capacity of friction driven piles. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(9):935–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abu-Farsakh MY, Titi HH (2007) Probabilistic CPT method for estimating the ultimate capacity of friction piles. Geotech Test J 30(5):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abu-Farsakh M (2004) Evaluation of consolidation characteristics of cohesive soils from piezocone penetration tests. Report No. FHWA/LA.03/386, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA

  5. Axelsson G (2000) Long term set-up of piles in sand. Doctoral thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

  6. Briaud JL, Tucker LM (1988) Measured and predicted axial response of 98 piles. J Geotech Eng 114(8):984–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bullock PJ, Schmertmann JH, McVay MC, Townsend FC (2005) Side shear setup I: test piles driven in Florida. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(3):292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bustamante M, Gianeselli L (1982) Pile bearing capacity predictions by means of static penetrometer CPT. In: Proceedings to 2nd European symposium on penetration testing, ESOPTII, Amsterdam, pp 493–500

  9. Chen Q, Haque M, Abu-Farsakh M, Fernandez BA (2014) Field investigation of pile set-up in mixed soil. Geotech Test J 37(2):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chow FC, Jardine RJ, Nauroy JF, Brucy F (1997) Time related increase in shaft capacities of driven piles in sand. Geotechnique 47(2):353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chow FC, Jardine RJ, Brucy F, Nauroy JF (1998) Effects of time on capacity of pipe piles in dense Marine sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(3):254–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Ruiter J, Beringen FL (1979) Pile foundations for large North Sea structures. Mar Geotechnol 3(3):267–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Doherty P, Gavin K (2011) Shaft capacity of open-ended piles in clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(11):1090–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eslami A, Fellenius BH (1997) Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTU methods applied to 102 case histories. Can Geotech J 34:886–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eslami A, Fellenius BH (1995) Toe bearing capacity of piles from cone penetration (CPT) test. In: Proceedings to international symposium on cone penetration testing (CPT’95), Sweden, October 4–5

  16. Fawad SN, Paul WM (2013) Cone penetration test based direct methods for evaluating static axial capacity of single piles. Geotech Geol Eng 31(4):979–1009

  17. Fellinius BH (2008) Effective stress analysis and set-up for shaft capacity of piles in clay. In: Proceedings to from research to practice in geotechnical engineering, Geo-Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineering, Alberta, Canada, pp 384–406

  18. Fellenius BH (2015) The response of a “plug” in an open-toe pile. Geotech Eng J SEAGS AGSSEA 46(2):82–86

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fugro. Axial pile capacity design methods for offshore driven piles in sand. Report to the American Petroleum Institute, P-1003, Issue

  20. Haque MN, Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q (2015) Pile set-up for individual soil layers along instrumented test piles in clayey soil. In: Manzanal D, Sfriso AO (eds) Proceedings of the 15th Pan-American conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering (from fundamentals to applications in geotechnics), 15–18 November. IOS Press, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp 390–397

  21. Haque MN, Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q, Zhang Z (2014) Case study on instrumenting and testing full scale test piles for evaluating set-up phenomenon. J Transp Res Board 2462:37–47

  22. Haque MN, Abu-Farsakh M, Tsai C (2016) Field investigation to evaluate the effects of pile installation sequence on pile setup behavior for instrumented test piles. Geotech Test J 39(5):769–785

  23. Haque MN, Abu-Farsakh M, Zhang Z, Okeil A (2016) Developing a model to estimate pile setup for individual soil layers on the basis of piezocone penetration test data. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2579:17–31

  24. Haque MN, Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M, Tsai C (2014) Effects of pile size on set-up behavior of cohesive soils. In: Proceedings of geo-congress 2014, geocharacterization and modeling for sustainability, 23–26 Feb, GSP No. 234. American Society of Civil Engineers, Georgia, pp 1743–1749

  25. Henke S, Grabe J (2008) Numerical investigation of soil plugging inside open-ended piles with respect to the installation method. Acta Geotech 3(3):215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Henke S, Grabe J (2013) Field measurements regarding the influence of the installation method on soil plugging in tubular piles. Acta Geotech 8(3):335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jardine RJ, Chow FC. New design methods for offshore piles MTD Publication 96/103. Marine Technology Directorate, Ltd. London

  28. Jardine RJ, Overy RF, Chow FC (1998) Axial capacity of offshore piles in dense North Sea sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(2):171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jardine RJ, Chow FC, Overy R, Standing J (2005) ICP design methods for driven piles in sands and clays. Thomas Telford, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Karlsrud K, Clausen CJF, Aas PM (2005) Bearing capacity of driven piles in clay, the NGI approach. In: Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics, Taylor & Francis, University of Western Australia, Perth, September 19–21, pp 775–782

  31. Kim D, Bica A, Salgado R, Prezzi M, Lee W (2009) Load testing of a closed-ended pipe pile driven in multilayered soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(4):463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Komurka VE, Wagner AB, Edil TB (2003) Estimating soil/pile set-up. Wisconsin highway research program #0092-00-14, Wisconsin Department of Transportation

  33. Lehane BM, Schneider JA, Xu X (2005) CPT based design of driven piles in sand for offshore structures. UWA Report, GEO: 05345

  34. Lehane BM, Li Y, Williams R (2013) Shaft capacity of displacement piles in clay using the cone penetration test. J Geotech Geo-Environ Eng 139(2):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lim JK, Lehane BM (2014) Characterisation of the effects of time on the shaft friction of displacement piles in sand. Geotechnique 64(6):476–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu R, Zhou L, Lin M, Yan S (2015) Soil plug effect evaluation for large diameter steel pipe pile in offshore engineering. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth (2015) international ocean and polar engineering conference, Kona, Big Island, Hawaii, USA, June 21–26

  37. Matsumoto T, Takei M (1991) Effects of soil plug on behavior of driven pipe pile. Soil Found 31(2):14–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Matsumoto T, Kitiyodom P, Wakisaka T, Nishimura S (2004) Research on plugging of open-ended steel pipe piles and practice in japan. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on the application of stress-wave theory in piles, Selangor, pp 133–152

  39. Miller G, Lutenegger A (1997) Influence of pile plugging on skin friction in overconsolidated clay. J Geotech Geo-Environ Eng 123(6):525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ng KW, Roling M, AbdelSalam SS, Suleiman MT, Sritharan S (2013) Pile set-up in cohesive soil. I: experimental investigation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(2):199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Paik KH, Salgado R (2003) Determination of the bearing capacity of open-ended piles in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(1):46–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Paikowsky SG, Whitman RV, Baligh MM (1990) A new look at the phenomenon of offshore pile plugging. Mar Geotech 8(3):213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rausche MF, Robinson B, Likins G (2004) On the prediction of long term pile capacity from end-of-driving information. In: Proceedings of the current practices and future trends in deep foundation, GSP No. 125, CA, July 27–31, pp 77–95

  44. Robertson PK, Campanella RG, Davis MP, Sy A (1988) Axial capacity of driven piles in deltaic soils using CPT. In: Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on penetration testing, ISOPT-1, FL, pp 919–928

  45. Schmertmann JH (1978) Guidelines for cone penetration test. Performance and design. U.S. Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA-TS-78-209, Washington, DC, p 145

  46. Schmertmann JH (1991) The mechanical aging of soils. J Geotech Eng 117(9):1288–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Skov R, Denver H (1988) Time dependence of bearing capacity of piles. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on the application of stress-wave theory to piles, Canada, pp 879–888

  48. Suriyah T, Matsumoto T, Kobayashi S, Kitiydom P, Kurosawa K (2011) Experimental and numerical studies on push-up load tests for sand plugs in a steel pipe pile. Soils Found 51(5):959–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stevens R, Wiltsie E, Turton T (1982) Evaluating pile drivability for hard clay very dense sand and rock. In: 14th offshore technology conference, Houston, OTC, pp 465–481

  50. Szechy CH (1961) The effect of vibration and driving upon the voids in granular soil surrounding a pile. In: Proceedings to 5th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Paris, pp 161–164

  51. Tan Y, Lin G (2013) Full scale testing of open-ended steel pipe piles in thick varved clayey silt deposits along the Delaware River in New Jersey. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(3):518–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Titi HH, Abu-Farsakh MY. Evaluation of bearing capacity of piles from cone penetration test data. Report No. FHWA/LA 99/334, Louisiana Transportation Research Center

  53. Yu F, Yang J (2013) Base capacity of open-ended steel pipe piles in sand. J Geotech Geo-Environ Eng 138(9):116–1128

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang Z, Tumay MT (1999) Statistical to fuzzy approach toward CPT soil classification. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125(3):179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang Z, Wang YH (2015) Examining setup mechanisms of driven piles in sand using laboratory model pile tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(3):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhihong H, McVay M, Bloomquist D, Horhota D (2012) New ultimate pile capacity prediction method based on cone penetration test (CPT). Can Geotech J 49(8):961–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC Project No. 11-2GT) and Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (State Project No. 736-99-1732). The help and support from the LADOTD geotechnical design section personnel are also highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abu-Farsakh, M.Y., Haque, M.N. & Tsai, C. A full-scale field study for performance evaluation of axially loaded large-diameter cylinder piles with pipe piles and PSC piles. Acta Geotech. 12, 753–772 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0498-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0498-9

Keywords

Navigation