Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water supply and sustainability: life cycle assessment of water collection, treatment and distribution service

  • WATER USE IN LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present paper is to describe the development of a life cycle assessment study of the service of potable water supply in Sicily, Italy. The analysis considers the stages of collection, treatment and distribution of potable water through the regional network, whilst the use stage of water is not included.

Methods

The selection of a methodological pattern coherently with the requirements of an environmental label, such as the EPDs, aims at allowing comparability among different studies.

Results and discussion

The analysis shows the shares of impacts along the life cycle chain, i.e. outputs by well fields and spring groups, purification and desalination plants, water losses in the waterworks, electrical consumption of waterworks systems and impacts of network maintenance. With regard to global warming potential (GWP), the impact of purification plants represents a 6–7 % share of the total, whilst desalination is at 74 %. Water losses in the waterworks show an impact of 15–17 %; the contribution owing to electrical consumption of waterworks systems and network maintenance results to be 3 %. Desalination plants represent the major contribution to all impact categories considered.

Conclusions

In respect to management issues, the most relevant impact categories resulted to be GWP, non-renewable energy resources and water consumption. Since the results for non-renewable energy resources are strictly connected to GWP emissions, carbon footprint and water footprint can be profitably used as single-issue indicators without the risk of burden shifting in studies aiming to evaluate the impact of potable water distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti M, Marzluff J (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosyst 7:241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrios R, Siebel M, van der Helm A, Bosklopper K, Gijzen H (2008) Environmental and financial life cycle impact assessment of drinking water production at Waternet. J Cleane Prod 16:471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, p. 210

  • Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2010) Water footprinting: how to address water use in life cycle assessment? Sustainability 2:919–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugmann J (1997) Sustainability indicators revisited: getting from political objectives to performance outcomes—a response to Graham Pinfield. Local Environ 2:299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollina A, Micale G, Rizzuti L (2005) A critical assessment of desalination operations in Sicily. Desalination 182:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das TK (2002) Evaluating the life cycle environmental performance of chlorine disinfection and ultraviolet technologies. Clean Techn Environ Pol 4(1):32–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Del Borghi A, Gaggero PL, Gallo M, Strazza C (2008) Development of PCR for WWTP based on a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(6):512–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennison FJ, Azapagic A, Clift R, Colbourne JS (1998) Assessing management options for wastewater treatment works in the context of life cycle assessment. Water Sci Technol 38(11):23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson RHC, Morse GK, Lester JN, Edge DR (1995) The life-cycle analysis of small scale sewage-treatment processes. J Ciwem 9:317–325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2000) Water Framework Directive, 2000/60/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 327, 22 Dec 2000, Brussels

  • Fagan JE, Reuter MA, Langford KJ (2010) Dynamic performance metrics to assess sustainability and cost effectiveness of integrated urban water systems. Resour Conserv Recy 54:719–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich E, Pillay S, Buckley CA (2009) Carbon footprint analysis for increasing water supply and sanitation in South Africa: a case study. J Clean Prod 17:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • General Programme Instructions for Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) (2008). Available from http://www.environdec.com/documents/pdf/EPD_instructions_080229.pdf

  • Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard. Earthscan Ltd, Dunstan House, 14a St Cross Street, London EC1N 8XA, UK. Earthscan LLC, 1616 P Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA

  • Hellströn D, Jeppsson U, Kärrman E (2000) A framework for systems analysis of sustainable urban water management. Environ Impact Asses 20:311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006a) Environmental management, life cycle assessment. European Standard EN ISO14040-14044. International Organization for Standardization

  • ISO (2006b) Environmental labels and declarations. Type III environmental declarations. Principles and procedures. European Standard ISO 14025. International Organization for Standardization

  • Jones SA, Silva C (2009) A practical method to evaluate the sustainability of rural water and sanitation infrastructure systems in developing countries. Desalination 248:500–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kao JJ, Pan TC, Lin CM (2009) An environmental sustainability based budget allocation system for regional water quality management. J Environ Manage 90:699–709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klostermann JEM, Cramer J (2007) Social construction of sustainability in water companies in the Dutch coastal zone. J Cleaner Prod 15:1573–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2005) Life cycle assessment in the mirror of Int J LCA: past, present, and future. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(6):379–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landu L, Brent AC (2006) Environmental life cycle assessment of water supply in South Africa: the Rosslyn industrial area as a case study. Water SA 32(2):249–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M, Lundie S, Bransgrove G, Charet L, Sack F (2003) Assessing the ecological footprint of a large metropolitan water supplier: lessons for water management and planning towards sustainability. J Environ Plann Man 46(1):113–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin M, Morrison GM (2002) A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems. Urban Water 4:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahgoub MEM, van der Steen NP, Abu-Zeid K, Vairavamoorthy K (2010) Towards sustainability in urban water: a life cycle analysis of the urban water system of Alexandria City, Egypt. J Cleaner Prod 18:1100–1106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meneses M, Pasqualino JC, Castells F (2010) Environmental assessment of urban wastewater reuse: treatment alternatives and applications. Chemosphere 81:266–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minciardi R, Robba M, Sacile R (2007) Decision models for sustainable groundwater planning and control. Control Eng Pract 15(8):1013–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz I, Rodríguez A, Rosal R, Fernández-Alba AR (2009) Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater reuse with ozonation as tertiary treatment: a focus on toxicity-related impacts. Sci Total Environ 407:1245–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiza M, Raluya RG, Serra L (2007) Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town. Desalination 204(1–3):121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PCR 2011:12 (2011) Product-Category Rules for UN CPC class 6921 Water distribution through mains (except steam and hot water). http://www.environdec.com/en/Product-Category-Rules/Detail/?Pcr=5880

  • Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4098–4104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister S, Hellweg S (2009) The water “shoesize” vs. footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(35):E93–E94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raluy GR, Serra L, Uche J (2005) Life cycle assessment of water production technologies—part 1: life cycle assessment of different commercial desalination technologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(4):285–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt BG, Eady SJ, Sellahewa J, Simons L, Bektash R (2009) Water footprinting at the product brand level: case study and future challenges. J Cleaner Prod 17(13):1228–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010) A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rihon AC, Lassaux S, Germain A (2002) Application of the LCA methodology to water management from the pumping station to the wastewater treatment plant. 10th SETAC LCA Case Studies Symposium, Barcelona, Spain

  • Sahely HR, Kennedy CA, Adams BJ (2005) Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems. Can J Civil Eng 32(1):72–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supporting Annexes for Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) (2008) Available from http://www.environdec.com/documents/pdf/EPD_annexes_080229.pdf

  • Tawfic AM (2007) Life cycle assessment, a decision-making tool in wastewater treatment facilities. In: Wastewater reuse—risk assessment, decision-making and environmental security. Springer, Dordrecht

  • United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (2005) Indicators of sustainable development-review and assessment. Expert group meeting on indicators of sustainable development. New York, 13–15 December 2005. Background paper. Available from http://www.asdmas.com/documentos/crp1.pdf

  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2004) Urban indicators guidelines-monitoring the habitat agenda and the millennium development goals. Available from http://www.unhabitat.org/programmes/guo/documents/urban_indicators_guidelines.pdf

  • Viceconte G (2004) Quaderno No. 8—Il sistema idrico in Sicilia, PON ATAS 2000–2006

  • Vince F, Aoustin E, Bréant P, Marechal F (2008) LCA tool for the environmental evaluation of potable water production. Desalination 220:37–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal N, Poch M, Marti E, Rodriguez-Roda I (2002) Evaluation of the environmental implications to include structural changes in a wastewater treatment plant. J Chem Tech Biotech 77:1206–1211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future, report of the world commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford (established by the United Nations in 1983 and chaired by Mrs. Brundtland)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Siciliacque Spa for providing the data for the study presented in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana Del Borghi.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Stephan Pfister

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Del Borghi, A., Strazza, C., Gallo, M. et al. Water supply and sustainability: life cycle assessment of water collection, treatment and distribution service. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 1158–1168 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0549-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0549-5

Keywords

Navigation