Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Assessment of Droughts in Gujarat Using Bivariate Copulas

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents risk assessment of hydrologic extreme events droughts in Saurashtra and Kutch region of Gujarat state, India. Drought is a recurrent phenomenon and risk assessment of droughts can play an important role in proper planning and management of water resources in the study region. In the study, drought events are characterized by severity and duration, and drought occurrences are modeled by Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) computed on mean areal precipitation, aggregated at a time scale of 6 months for the period 1900–2008. After evaluating several distribution functions, drought variable—severity is best described by non-parametric kernel density, whereas duration is best fitted by exponential distribution. Considering the extreme nature of drought variables, the upper tail dependence copula families including two Archimedean—Gumbel-Hougaard, BB1 and one elliptical—Student’s t copulas are evaluated for modeling joint distribution of drought variables. On evaluating their performance using various goodness-of-fit measures, Gumbel-Hougaard copula is found to be the best performing copula in modeling the joint dependence structure of drought variables. Also, while comparing with traditional bivariate distributions, the copula based distributions are resulted in better performance as compared to bivariate log-normal and the logistic model for bivariate extreme value distributions. Then joint and conditional return periods of drought characteristics are derived, which can be helpful for risk based planning and management of water resources systems in the study region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control AC-19(6):716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irr and Drain Paper 56. UN-FAO, Rome, Italy

  • Bozdogan H (2000) Akaike’s information criterion and recent developments in information complexity. J Math Psychol 44:62–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capéraá P, Fougéres A-L, Genest C (1997) A non-parametric estimation procedure for bivariate extreme value copulas. Biometrika 84:567–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census (2001) Population projections for India and States 2001–2026. Report of the technical group on population projections constituted by the National Commission on Population. New Delhi, India

  • Cherubini U, Luciano E, Vecchiato W (2004) Copula methods in finance. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Chichester, UK

  • Coles SG, Heffernan J, Tawn JA. (1999) Dependence measures for extreme value analyses. Extremes 2(4): 339–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalante C (2007) Application of bivariate extreme value distribution to flood frequency analysis: a case study of Northwestern Mexico. Nat Hazards 42:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frahm G, Junker M, Schimdt R (2005) Estimating the tail-dependence coefficient: properties and pitfalls. Insur Math Econ 37:80–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Favre AC (2007) Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. J Hydrol Eng 12(4):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Rivest L-P (1993) Statistical inference procedures for bivariate Archimedean copulas. J Am Stat Assoc 88(423):1034–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Ghoudi K, Rivest LP (1995) A semiparametric estimation procedure of dependence parameters in multivariate families of distributions. Biometrika 82(3):543–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González J, Valdés JB (2003) Bivariate drought recurrence analysis using tree ring reconstructions. J Hydrol Eng 8(5):247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gringorten II (1963) A plotting rule for extreme probability paper. J Geophys Res 68(3):813–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel EJ (1961) Bivariate logistic distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 56:335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel EJ, Mustafi CK (1967) Some analytical properties of bivariate extreme distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 62:569–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan CT (1977) Statistical methods in hydrology. The Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. Vol.73. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe H, Smith RL, Weissman I (1992) Bivariate threshold models for extremes. J Roy Stat Soc B 54:171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao SC, Govindaraju RS (2010) A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. J Hydrol 380:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyantash J, Dracup JA (2002) The quantification of drought: an evaluation of drought indices. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1167–1180

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim T-W, Valdés JB, Yoo C (2006) Nonparametric approach for bivariate drought characterization using Palmer drought index. J Hydrol Eng 11(2):134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labedzki L (2007) Estimation of local drought frequency in central Poland using standardized precipitation index SPI. Irrig Drain 56:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashal R, Zeevi A (2002) Beyond correlation: extreme co-movements between financial assets. Technical Report, University of Columbia

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kliest J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration time scales. Proc 8th Int Conf Applied Climatol. Boston, MA: 179–184

  • Nadarajah S (2007) A bivariate gamma model for drought. Water Resour Res 43:W08501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadarajah S (2009) A bivariate pareto model for drought. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(6):811–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen RB (1999) An introduction to copulas. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen RB, Quesada-Molina JJ, Rodríguez-Lallena JA, Úbeda-Flores M (2008) On the construction of copulas and quasi-copulas with given diagonal sections. Insur Math Econ 42:473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky HA, Brier GW (1958) Some applications of statistics to meteorology. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashiardis S, Michaelides S (2008) Implementation of the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) for regional drought assessment: a case study for Cyprus. Eur Water 23:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi G (2000) Drought mitigation measures: a comprehensive framework. In: Voght JV, Somma F (eds) Drought and drought mitigation in Europe. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori G (2004) Bivariate return periods via 2-copulas. Stat Methodol 1:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos JF, Portela MM, Pulido-Calvo I (2011) Regional frequency analysis of droughts in Portugal. Water Resour Manag 25:3537–3558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer B, Wolff EF (1981) On nonparametric measures of dependence for random variables. Ann Stat 9(4):879–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT (2003) Return period of bivariate distributed hydrological events. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 17(1–2):42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT (2006) Fitting drought duration and severity with two-dimensional copulas. Water Resour Manag 20:795–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Shen HW (2001) Resource analysis of hydrologic droughts of different severity. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(1):30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Feng S, Nadarjah S (2007) Assessment of hydrological droughts for the Yellow River, China, using copulas. Hydrol Processes 21(16):2157–2163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de répartition á n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ Inst Stat Univ Paris 8:229–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Singh VP (2010) Frequency analysis of droughts using the Plackett copula and parameter estimation by genetic algorithm. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24:783–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda M, Lecomte D, Hayes M, Heim R, Gleason K, Angel J, Rippey B, Tinker R, Palecki M, Stooksbury D, Miskus D, Stephens S (2002) The drought monitor. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1181–1190

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris G, Pangalou D, Vangelis H (2007) Regional drought assessment based on the Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI). Water Resour Manag 21(5):821–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme UNEP (2001) Asia-Pacific environment outlook. Nat Hazards. http://www.rrcap.org/apeo/toc.html. (Accessed on 4 September 2010)

  • Vangelis H, Spiliotis M, Tsakiris G (2011) Drought severity assessment based on bivariate probability analysis. Water Resour Manag 25(1):357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong G, Lambert MF, Leonard M, Metcalfe AV (2010) Drought analysis using trivariate copulas conditional on climate states. J Hydrol Eng 15(2):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang DW, Nadarajah S (2006) Drought modeling and products of random variables with exponential kernel. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21(2):123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue S (2000) The bivariate lognormal distribution to model a multivariate flood episode. Hydrol Processes 14(14):2575–2588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue S (2001) A bivariate extreme value distribution applied to flood frequency analysis. Nord Hydrol 32(1):49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarch MAA, Malekinezhad H, Mobin MH, Dastorani MT, Kousari MR (2011) Drought monitoring by Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) in Iran. Water Resour Manag 25:3485–3504

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Janga Reddy.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 A1 Simulation from Bivariate Archimedean Copulas

Simulation of random pair (u, v) from distribution function Copula C(•) is performed using following steps (Joe 1997):

  1. 1.

    Simulate sequence of two independent uniform random variates u and q from U (0, 1).

  2. 2.

    Evaluate the inverse of conditional distribution function at v, i.e.,

    v = C −1(q|u), where \( C\left( {v|u;\theta } \right) = \frac{{\partial C\left( {u,v;\theta } \right)}}{{\partial u}} \) is the first derivative of the bivariate marginal of copula function, C(u, v; θ).

  3. 3.

    Then the pair (u, v) are uniformly distributed random variables drawn from the respective copula families C(u, v; θ). The simulated observations from copulas can be obtained by computing \( \left( {x,y} \right) = \left[ {F_X^{{ - 1}}(u),F_Y^{{ - 1}}(v)} \right] \), where \( F_X^{{ - 1}}\left( \bullet \right) \) and \( F_Y^{{ - 1}}\left( \bullet \right) \) are the inverse of cumulative distribution functions of X and Y respectively.

1.2 A2 Simulation from Bivariate Student’s t Copula

  1. 1.

    Generate random vector z 1, z 2 with ϑ degrees of freedom and P i,j as correlation matrix after calibration of Student’s t copula, i.e., (z 1, z 2) ≈ t d (ϑ, P i,j ); where t d (•) is multivariate t distribution.

  2. 2.

    Set (u, v) = (t ϑ (z 1), t ϑ (z 2)), where t ϑ (•) is the univariate Student’s t distribution with ϑ degrees of freedom.

  3. 3.

    Simulated observations from copula based joint distribution can be obtained by computing \( \left( {x,y} \right) = \left[ {F_X^{{ - 1}}(u),F_Y^{{ - 1}}(v)} \right] \).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganguli, P., Reddy, M.J. Risk Assessment of Droughts in Gujarat Using Bivariate Copulas. Water Resour Manage 26, 3301–3327 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0073-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0073-6

Keywords

Navigation