Abstract
Genome editing technologies, such as CRISPR/Cas, have recently become valuable tools for plant reverse genetics as well as crop improvement, including enhancement of disease resistance. Targeting susceptibility (S) genes by genome editing has proven to be a viable strategy for generating resistance to both bacterial and fungal pathogens in various crops. Examples include generating loss-of-function mutations in promoter elements of the SWEET S genes, which are targeted by transcription activator-like effectors secreted by many phytopathogenic Xanthomonas bacteria, as well as in the conserved MLO locus that confers susceptibility to powdery mildew fungal pathogens in many monocots and dicots. In addition to genome editing applications, CRISPR/Cas systems can be used as means of defending plants against viruses via targeting viral genomic DNA or RNA. Genome editing is therefore a highly promising approach that enables engineering disease resistance to various plant pathogens directly in elite cultivar background in a highly precise manner. Unlike conventional crop breeding, genome editing approaches are not relying on lengthy and laborious crosses/back-crosses involving parental and progeny lines and can significantly shorten the breeding timeline. Taking into account the high potential of genome editing technologies for both basic and applied plant science, the recent decision of the European Court of Justice to define transgene-free genetically edited crops as GMOs is, clearly, a backward step for the EU.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
The figure is modified with permission from (Nekrasov et al. 2017) under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
References
Abudayyeh OO, Gootenberg JS, Essletzbichler P et al (2017) RNA targeting with CRISPR–Cas13. Nature 550:nature24049. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24049
Acevedo-Garcia J, Spencer D, Thieron H et al (2017) mlo-based powdery mildew resistance in hexaploid bread wheat generated by a non-transgenic TILLING approach. Plant Biotechnol J 15:367–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12631
Ali Z, Abulfaraj A, Idris A et al (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants. Genome Biol 16:238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0799-6
Aman R, Ali Z, Butt H et al (2018) RNA virus interference via CRISPR/Cas13a system in plants. Genome Biol 19:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1381-1
Baltes NJ, Hummel AW, Konecna E et al (2015) Conferring resistance to geminiviruses with the CRISPR–Cas prokaryotic immune system. Nat Plants 1:15145. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.145
Bezrutczyk M, Yang J, Eom J-S et al (2018) Sugar flux and signaling in plant–microbe interactions. Plant J 93:675–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13775
Blanvillain-Baufumé S, Reschke M, Solé M et al (2017) Targeted promoter editing for rice resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae reveals differential activities for SWEET14-inducing TAL effectors. Plant Biotechnol J 15:306–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12613
Chu Z, Yuan M, Yao J et al (2006) Promoter mutations of an essential gene for pollen development result in disease resistance in rice. Genes Dev 20:1250–1255. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1416306
Cohn M, Bart RS, Shybut M et al (2014) Xanthomonas axonopodis virulence is promoted by a transcription activator-like effector-mediated induction of a SWEET sugar transporter in cassava. MPMI 27:1186–1198. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-06-14-0161-R
Cohn M, Morbitzer R, Lahaye T, Staskawicz BJ (2016) Comparison of gene activation by two TAL effectors from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis reveals candidate host susceptibility genes in cassava. Mol Plant Pathol 17:875–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12337
Dahan-Meir T, Filler-Hayut S, Melamed-Bessudo C et al (2018) Efficient in planta gene targeting in tomato using geminiviral replicons and the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant J 95:5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13932
Devoto A, Piffanelli P, Nilsson I et al (1999) Topology, subcellular localization, and sequence diversity of the Mlo family in plants. J Biol Chem 274:34993–35004. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.49.34993
Hahn F, Eisenhut M, Mantegazza O, Weber APM (2018) Homology-directed repair of a defective glabrous gene in Arabidopsis with Cas9-based gene targeting. Front Plant Sci 9:424. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00424
Hanley-Bowdoin L, Bejarano ER, Robertson D, Mansoor S (2013) Geminiviruses: masters at redirecting and reprogramming plant processes. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:777–788. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3117
Hummel AW, Chauhan RD, Cermak T et al (2017) Allele exchange at the EPSPS locus confers glyphosate tolerance in cassava. Plant Biotechnol J. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12868
Jansen C, von Wettstein D, Schäfer W et al (2005) Infection patterns in barley and wheat spikes inoculated with wild-type and trichodiene synthase gene disrupted Fusarium graminearum. PNAS 102:16892–16897. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508467102
Jarosch B, Kogel K-H, Schaffrath U (1999) The ambivalence of the barley Mlo locus: mutations conferring resistance against powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) enhance susceptibility to the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. MPMI 12:508–514. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.6.508
Ji X, Zhang H, Zhang Y et al (2015) Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants. Nat Plants 1:15144. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.144
Kusch S, Panstruga R (2017) mlo-based resistance: an apparently universal “weapon” to defeat powdery mildew disease. MPMI 30:179–189. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-12-16-0255-CR
Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH et al (2012) High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotechnol 30:390–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2199
Nekrasov V, Staskawicz B, Weigel D et al (2013) Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol 31:691–693. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2655
Nekrasov V, Wang C, Win J et al (2017) Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion. Sci Rep 7:482. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00578-x
Peterson BA, Haak DC, Nishimura MT et al (2016) Genome-wide assessment of efficiency and specificity in CRISPR/Cas9 mediated multiple site targeting in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 11:e0162169. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162169
Schornack S, Moscou MJ, Ward ER, Horvath DM (2013) Engineering plant disease resistance based on TAL effectors. Annu Rev Phytopathol 51:383–406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102255
Streubel J, Pesce C, Hutin M et al (2013) Five phylogenetically close rice SWEET genes confer TAL effector-mediated susceptibility to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. N Phytol 200:808–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12411
Tang X, Liu G, Zhou J et al (2018) A large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals highly specific genome editing by both Cas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) nucleases in rice. Genome Biol 19:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1458-5
Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q et al (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2969
Wolter M, Hollricher K, Salamini F, Schulze-Lefert P (1993) The mlo resistance alleles to powdery mildew infection in barley trigger a developmentally controlled defence mimic phenotype. Mol Gen Genet 239:122–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281610
Yang B, Sugio A, White FF (2006) Os8N3 is a host disease-susceptibility gene for bacterial blight of rice. PNAS 103:10503–10508. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604088103
Zhou J, Peng Z, Long J et al (2015) Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice. Plant J 82:632–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12838
Acknowledgements
I thank the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for supporting me in attending the OECD Conference on Genome Editing (Paris, 2018). Vladimir Nekrasov (Rothamsted Research) receives grant-aided support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Designing Future Wheat project [BB/P016855/1] and Newton Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this paper are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD or of the governments of its Member countries.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nekrasov, V. Sequence-specific nucleases as tools for enhancing disease resistance in crops. Transgenic Res 28 (Suppl 2), 75–80 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00137-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00137-2