Abstract
The Morris water maze has been put forward in the philosophy of neuroscience as an example of an experimental arrangement that may be used to delineate the cognitive faculty of spatial memory (e.g., Craver and Darden, Theory and method in the neurosciences, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 2001; Craver, Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007). However, in the experimental and review literature on the water maze throughout the history of its use, we encounter numerous responses to the question of “what” phenomenon it circumscribes ranging from cognitive functions (e.g., “spatial learning”, “spatial navigation”), to representational changes (e.g., “cognitive map formation”) to terms that appear to refer exclusively to observable changes in behavior (e.g., “water maze performance”). To date philosophical analyses of the water maze have not been directed at sorting out what phenomenon the device delineates nor the sources of the different answers to the question of what. I undertake both of these tasks in this paper. I begin with an analysis of Morris’s first published research study using the water maze and demonstrate that he emerged from it with an experimental learning paradigm that at best circumscribed a discrete set of observable changes in behavior. However, it delineated neither a discrete set of representational changes nor a discrete cognitive function. I cite this in combination with a reductionist-oriented research agenda in cellular and molecular neurobiology dating back to the 1980s as two sources of the lack of consistency across the history of the experimental and review literature as to what is under study in the water maze.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bechtel W. (2008) Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York
Bechtel W. (2009) Molecules, systems, and behavior: Another view of memory consolidation. In: Bickle J. (eds) Oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 13–40
Bickle J. (2003) Philosophy and neuroscience: A ruthlessly reductive account. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht
Bickle J. (2006) Reducing mind to molecular pathways: Explicating the reductionism implicit in current cellular and molecular neuroscience. Synthese 151: 411–434
Bliss T., Lømo T. (1973) Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. Journal of Physiology 232(2): 331–356
Bogen J., Woodward J. (1988) Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review 97: 303–352
Brandeis R., Brandys Y., Yehuda S. (1989) The use of the Morris water maze in the study of memory and learning. International Journal of Neuroscience 48: 29–69
Chang H. (2004) Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford University Press, New York
Chang, H. (2009). Operationalism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online. Retrieved July 16, 2009, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/operationalism/.
Craver C. (2007) Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Craver C., Darden L. (2001) Discovering mechanisms in neurobiology: The case of spatial memory. In: Machamer P. K., Grush R., McLaughlin P. (eds) Theory and method in the neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 112–136
Cummins R. (1975) Functional analysis. The Journal of Philosophy 72(20): 741–765
Davis S., Butcher S., Morris R. G. (1992) The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro. Journal of Neuroscience 12(1): 21–34
D’Hooge R., De Deyn P. (2001) Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Research Reviews 36: 60–90
Dudai Y. (1989) The neurobiology of memory: Concepts, findings, trends. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dudai Y. (2002) Memory from A to Z: Keywords, concepts and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Eichenbaum H., Stewart C., Morris R.G. (1990) Hippocampal representation in place learning. The Journal of Neuroscience 10(11): 3531–3542
Feest, U. (2003). Operationism, experimentation, and concept formation. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Feest U. (2005) Operationism in psychology: What the debate is about, what the debate should be about. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 41(2): 131–149
Feest, U. (Forthcoming). What exactly is stabilized when phenomena are stabilized? Synthese.
Hebb, D. O. (1949 [2002]). The organization of behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hodges H. (1996) Maze procedures: The radial-arm and water maze compared. Cognitive Brain Research 3: 167–181
Machamer P. K. (2009) Neuroscience, learning and the return to behaviorism. In: Bickle J. (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 166–178
Morris R. G. (1981) Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learning and Motivation 12: 239–260
Morris R. G. (1984) Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 11: 47–60
Morris R. G. (1989) Synaptic plasticity and learning: Selective impairment of learning rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist AP5. Journal of Neuroscience 9(9): 3040–3057
Morris R. G. (1990) Toward a representational hypothesis of the role of hippocampal synaptic plasticity in spatial and other forms of learning. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium in Quantitative Biology 5: 161–173
Morris R. G. (2003) Long-term potentiation and memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358: 643–647
Morris R. G., Anderson E., Lynch G., Baudry M. (1986) Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature 319: 774–776
Morris R. G., Davis S., Butcher S. P. (1990) Hippocampal synaptic plasticity and NMDA receptors: A role in information storage?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 329(1253): 187–204
Morris R.G., Frey U. (1997) Hippocampal synaptic plasticity: Role in spatial learning or the automatic recording of attended experience?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 352: 1489–1503
Morris R. G., Garrud P., Rawlins J., O’Keefe J. (1982) Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297: 681–683
O’Keefe J., Dostrovsky J. (1971) The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence form unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Research 34: 171–175
O’Keefe J., Nadel L. (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Redish A. D. (1999) Beyond the cognitive map: From place cells to episodic memory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Redish A. D. (2001) The hippocampal debate: Are we asking the right questions?. Behavioral Brain Research 127: 81–98
Restle F. (1957) Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the ‘place-vs.-response’ question. The Psychological Review 64(4): 217–228
Sullivan, J. A. (2007). Reliability and validity of experiment in the neurobiology of learning and memory. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Sullivan J. A. (2009) The multiplicity of experimental protocols: a challenge to reductionist and non-reductionist models of the unity of neuro science. Synthese 167(3): 511–539
Sullivan, J. A. (Forthcoming). A role for representation in cognitive neurobiology. Philosophy of Science, PSA 2008 symposia papers.
Sullivan, J. A., Machamer, P. K., & Thiels, E. (2004). The study of learning and memory then and now: evidence for conceptual change? Paper presented at the Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
Sullivan, J. A., Machamer, P. K., & Thiels, E. (2005). The study of learning and memory then and now: Conceptual problems and experimental limitations. Paper presented at the Learning and Memory Workshop, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Sutherland R. J., Hamilton D. A. (2004) Rodent spatial navigation: At the crossroads of cognition and movement. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 28: 687–697
Sweatt J. D. (2009) Mechanisms of memory (2nd ed.). Academic Press, London
Tolman E. (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55: 189–208
Tolman E. C., Ritchie B. F., Kalish D. (1946) Studies in spatial learning. II. Place learning versus response learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 35: 221–229
Tolman E. C., Ritchie B. F., Kalish D. (1947) Studies in spatial learning. V. Response learning vs. place learning by the non-correction method. Journal of Experimental Psychology 37: 285–292
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sullivan, J.A. Reconsidering ‘spatial memory’ and the Morris water maze. Synthese 177, 261–283 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9849-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9849-5