Abstract
While “scientism” is typically regarded as a position about the exclusive epistemic authority of science held by a certain class of “cultured despisers” of “religion”, we show that only on the assumption of this sort of view do purportedly “scientific” claims made by proponents of “intelligent design” appear to lend epistemic or apologetic support to claims affirmed about God and God’s action in “creation” by Christians in confessing their “faith”. On the other hand, the hermeneutical strategy that better describes the practice and method of Christian theologians, from the inception of theological reflection in the Christian tradition, acknowledges the epistemic authority of the best available tests for truth in areas of human inquiry such as science and history. But this strategy does not assume that such tests, whose authority must be regarded as provisional, provides authority for the warrant of affirming claims constituting the confessed “faith”. By attributing theological import to claims advanced by appeal to the best available tests for truth in the practice of science, supporters of ID not only confuse the epistemic authority of these tests with the normative authority of a faith community’s confessional identity, but impute to scientific tests for truth a sort of authority that even goes beyond the “methodological naturalism” against which they counterpose their claims.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alston W.P. (1985) God’s action in the world. In: McMullin E. (eds) Evolution and creation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN
Behe M.J. (1996) Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. Free Press, New York
Behe M.J. (2001a) Reply to Shanks and Joplin. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 21(4): 15
Behe M.J. (2001b) Darwin’s breakdown: Irreducible complexity and design at the foundations of life. In: Dembski W.A., Kusiner J.M. (eds) Signs of intelligence: Understanding intelligent design. Brazos Press, Grand Rapids, Michigan
Benton E. (1981) Scientism. In: Bynum W.E., Browne E.J., Porter R. (eds) Dictionary of the history of science. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Darwin C. (1899) On the origin of species by means of natural selection (Vol. 2). Appleton, New York (Original work published 1859)
Darwin, F. (eds) (1888) The life and letters of Charles Darwin (Vol. 2). Appleton, New York
Dembski W.A. (1999) Intelligent design: The bridge between science and theology. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois
Dembski W.A. (2001) Signs of intelligence: A primer on the discernment of intelligent design. In: Dembski W.A., Kusiner J.M. (eds) Signs of intelligence: Understanding intelligent design. Brazos Press, Grand Rapids, Michigan
Dembski, W.A., Kusiner, J.M. (eds) (2001) Signs of intelligence: Understanding intelligent design. Brazos Press, Grand Rapids, Michigan
Fitzroy, R. (1989). A very few remarks with reference to the deluge. In E. J. Browne & M. Neve (Eds.), Voyage of the beagle. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1839)
Johnson P.E. (2000) The wedge of truth: Splitting the foundations of naturalism. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois
Lyell C. (1868) Principles of geology or the modern changes of the earth and its inhabitants (Vol. 2). John Murray, London
Malthus T. (1798) An essay of the principle of population(reproduced by IndyPublish.com). McLean, Virginia
Miller J.D., Scott E.C., Okamoto S. (2006) Public acceptance of evolution. Science 313(5788): 765–766
Musgrave I. (2004) The evolution of the bacterial flagellum. In: Young M., Edis T. (eds) Why intelligent design fails: A scientific critique of the new creationism. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick New Jersey
O’Connor R. (2003) The design inference: Old wine in new wineskins. In: Manson N.A. (eds) God and design: The teleological argument and modern science. Routledge, London, pp 1–1
Paley W. (1850) Natural theology, or evidence of the existence and attributes of the deity collected from the appearances of nature. American Tract Society, New York (Original work published 1801)
Pallen M.J., Matzke N.J. (2006) From the origin of species to the origin of the bacterial flagella. Nature Reviews Microbiology 4: 784–790
Scott E.C. (2005) Evolution vs. creationism: An introduction. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Shanks N. (2004) God, the devil, and Darwin: A critique of intelligent design theory. Oxford University Press, England
Sylla E.D. (2003) Creation and Nature. In: McGrade A.S. (eds) The Cambridge companion to medieval philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Taylor, J. H. (trans). (1982). Augustine of Hippo, The Literal Meaning of Genesis, (De genesi ad literam) (Vol. 2). NJ: Ramsey.
Williams P.S. (2002) The case for angels. Paternoster Press, Carlisle, UK
Young M., Edis T. (2004) Why intelligent design fails: A scientific critique of the new creationism. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shanks, N., Green, K. Intelligent design in theological perspective. Synthese 178, 307–330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9541-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9541-9