Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Smith on Indexicals

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I advance a new view of the semantics of indexicals, using a paper by Quentin Smith as my starting point. I make use of Smith’s examples, refined and expanded upon by myself to argue, as Smith does, that the standard view, that indexicals refer to some prominent features of the context according to an invariant rule called the character, does not agree with a wide range of phenomena. I depart from Smith, however, in denying that we need more complex rules, which he does not give, called metacharacters to account for all the deviations, and instead argue for a view of indexicals as just being special cases of demonstratives. I show how demonstratives can be substituted for indexicals to support this view, and I adduce recent work in the semantics of demonstratives to explain how it can work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E. Corazza (2004) ArticleTitle‘On the Alleged Ambiguity of ‘Now’ and ‘Here” Synthese 138 IssueID2 289–313 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:SYNT.0000013244.65400.a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Corazza W. Fish J. Gorvett (2002) ArticleTitle‘Who Is I?’ Philosophical Studies 107 1–21 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013111419036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gordon (1995) ‘Simulation Without Introspection or Inference from Me to You’ M. Davis T. Stone (Eds) Mental Simulation: Evaluations and Applications Blackwell Press Oxford 53–67

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kaplan (1989a) ‘Afterthoughts’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press New York 565–614

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kaplan (1989b) ‘Demonstratives’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press New York 481–564

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Krasner (2003) ArticleTitle‘Intention, Demonstration, and Verisimilitude’ Philosophia 30 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Perry (1979) ArticleTitle‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’ Nous 13 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Predelli (1998) ArticleTitle‘I Am Not Here Now’ Analysis 58 107–112 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Recanati (2001) ArticleTitle‘Are ‘Now’ and ‘Here’ Indexicals?’ Texte 127 115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Romdenh-Romluc (2002) ArticleTitle‘Now the French Are Invading England’ Analysis 62 34–41 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Searle (1983) Intentionality Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Q. Smith (1989) ArticleTitle‘The Multiple Uses of Indexicals’ Synthese 78 167–191 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00869371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Wettstein (1984) ArticleTitle‘How to Bridge the Gap between Meaning and Reference’ Synthese 58 63–84 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00485362

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Daniel Asher Krasner, 3720 Motor Ave.Apt.18, Los Angeles, CA, 90034, USA

    Daniel Asher Krasner

Authors
  1. Daniel Asher Krasner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Asher Krasner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krasner, D.A. Smith on Indexicals. Synthese 153, 49–67 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-2724-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-2724-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation