Skip to main content
Log in

Core Self-Evaluations Mediators of the Influence of Social Support on Job Involvement in Hospital Nurses

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to explore the influence of social support on job involvement and investigate the mediating effect of core self-evaluations on this relationship. A total of 330 participants who are all women completed a battery of questionnaires that assessed social support, core self-evaluations and job involvement. Data were collected by using the Core self-evaluations scale, Social support rating scale and Utrecht work engagement scale. The results indicated that both social support and core self-evaluations were significantly associated with the job involvement. Path analysis (AMOS) showed that core self-evaluations partially mediated the relationship between social support and job involvement. The final model also revealed a significant path from social support through core self-evaluations to job involvement. Limitations of the study are considered and implications of the results for promotion of nurses’ job involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, G. A., King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1996). Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice. A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. P., Carretero, M, Elkingt on, A., Pasqu al-Marset tin, E., Lobac caro, & C., Catalân, J. (2000). The role of personality, coping style and social support in health-related quality of life in HIV infection. Quality of Life Research 9: 423–437.

  • Caldwell, R. A., & Reinhart, M. A. (1988). The relationship of personality to individual differences in the use of type and source of social support. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, N. L. (1987). Working-class women: The relationship of job characteristics and job involvement to psychological well-being in employed mothers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 39–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez, A., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1270–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. B., Jr, Hester, K., & Cox, S. S. (2010). Proactive personality and job performance: Exploring job autonomy as a moderator. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22, 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gechman, A. S., & Wiener, Y. (1975). Job involvement and satisfaction as related to mental health and personal time devoted to work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 521–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). I won’t let you down or will I? Core self-evaluations, other-orientation, anticipated guilt and gratitude, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimmieson, N. L., McKimmie, B. M., Hannam, R. L., & Gallagher, J. (2010). An investigation of the stress-buffering effects of social support in the occupational stress process as a function of team identification. American Psychological Association, 14, 350–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Develpoment of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacmar, K. M., Collins, B. J., Harris, K. J., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Core self-evaluations and job performance: The role of the perceived work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1572–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaniasty, K. (2012). Predicting social psychological well-being following Trauma: The role of postdisaster social support. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4, 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • Krause, N., & Liang, J. (1990). Personality, social support, and psychological distress in later life. Psychology and Aging, 5, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakey, B., & Orehek, E. (2011). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health. Psychological Review, 118, 482–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, C., & Lee, C. (2009). An empirical study of employee job involvement and personality traits: The case of Taiwan. International Journal of Economics and Management, 3, 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodahl, T. M. (1964). Patterns of job attitudes in two assembly technologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8, 482–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manojlovich, M., Laschinger, S., & Heather, K. (2002). The relationship of empowerment and selected personality characteristics to nursing job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Administration, 32, 586–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markku, R. (1997). The relationship between job involvement and well-being. Journal of Psychology, 131, 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P. C., & Shyam, M. (2005). A correlational study of social support and job involvement in prison officers. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 31, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahum-Shani, I., Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2011). Social support and employee well-being: The conditioning effect of perceived patterns of supportive exchange. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., Le Blanc, P. M., Peeters, M., Bakker, A. B., & De Jonge, J. (2001). ‘Maakt arbeid gezond? Op zoek naar de bevlogen werkenemer’ [Does work make healthy? In search of the engaged worker] De. Psychology, 36, 422–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiger, C. P., & Wiese, B. S. (2011). Social support, unfulfilled expectations, and affective well-being on return to employment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 446–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorbaji, R., Messarra, L., & Karkoulian, S. (2011). Core self-evaluation: Predictor of employee engagement. The Business Review, 17, 276–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinokur, A. D., & van Ryn, M. (1993). Social support and undermining in close relationships: Their independent effects on the mental health of unemployed persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. D., Wang, X. L., & Ma, H. (1999). Rating scales for mental health: Social support rating scale. China, BJ: The Journal of Chinese Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, C. (2003). Measuring social support: PRQ2000. Measurement of Nursing Outcomes, 3, 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. –. H., & Griffin, M. A. (2012). Longitudinal relationships between core self-evaluations and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingkuan Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yan, X., Su, J. Core Self-Evaluations Mediators of the Influence of Social Support on Job Involvement in Hospital Nurses. Soc Indic Res 113, 299–306 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0093-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0093-x

Keywords

Navigation