Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reading different orthographic structures in the shallow-pointed Hebrew script: a cross-grade study in elementary school

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hebrew-speaking children learn to read using a transparent, pointed writing system, but by grade three, they gradually begin using the non-pointed version of Hebrew script. The current study examined the development of reading, in the pointed script, of a nationally representative sample of children in grades two, four, and six. Rate and accuracy for four different pointed orthographic structures: letter-diacritic mark combinations, legal pseudowords, illegal pseudowords, and real words, were collected. Results show linear development for all structure types with respect to reading rate. In decoding real words and legal pseudowords, accuracy shows linear development. For illegal pseudowords and most of the letter-diacritic mark combinations, however, children in grades two and six were more accurate than those in grade four, indicating non-linear developmental trends. Results from this study support the need for both universal as well as orthography-specific models of reading development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since rate scores were not available for all the participants in the present sample, the analyses were conducted on 837 children.

References

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2006). Reading in Arabic orthography: Characteristics, research findings, and assessment. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 321–338). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R. H. (2003). Word frequency distributions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and non lexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, A. (2010). The role of linguistic knowledge in learning to read non-voweled Hebrew. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

  • Bar-On, A., & Ravid, D. (in press). Morphological decoding in Hebrew pseudowords: A developmental study. Applied Psycholinguistics.

  • Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory & Cognition, 15, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnboim, S. (1995). Acquired surface dyslexia: The evidence from Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breznits, Z. (2002). Prevalence of reading difficulties and reading disabilities among 4th grade children in the Israeli Jewish population. (Report to israeli ministry of education office of the chief scientist). Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.

  • Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Mimran, R. (2006). Temporal processing deficits in Hebrew speaking children with reading disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Mimran, R. (2009). The contribution of language skills to reading fluency: A comparison of two orthographies for Hebrew. Journal of Child Language, 36, 657–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, F. A. (2009). Attentional control and the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 591–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1998). Word reading by sight and by analogy in beginning readers. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 87–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled and less skilled beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. C., & Hooper, A. M. (2001). Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 571–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, R. (1985). Effects of contextual richness on word recognition in pointed and unpointed Hebrew. Reading Psychology, 6, 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2006). Becoming literate in Hebrew: The grain size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science, 9, 439–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., & Grainger, J. (2000). Cross-linguistic perspectives on morphological processing: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geva, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Shany, M. (1993). The concurrent development of spelling and decoding in two different orthographies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & de Barrera, E. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., Porpodas, C., & Wheelwright, S. (1997). Children’s orthographic representations in English and Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gur, T. (2004). Reading Hebrew vowel diacritics: A longitudinal investigation from grade 1 to grade 3. Unpublished thesis dissertation, Haifa University, Israel.

  • Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meaning of words in reading: Co-operative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (1984). Reading without vowels: Lexical access in Hebrew. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (Vol. 10, pp. 1–15). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., & Korat, O. (1993). Sensitivity to phonological, morphological, and semantic cues in early reading and writing in Hebrew. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and it implications for reading instruction (report of the subgroups). Washington, DC: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D., & Shimron, Y. (1984). Reading Hebrew: How necessary is the graphemic representation of vowels? In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics (pp. 19–53). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öney, B., & Durgunoglu, A. Y. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, K., & Bandelow, S. (2006). Stochastic approaches to understanding dissociations in inflectional morphology. Brain and Language, 98, 194–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (1996). Accessing the mental lexicon: Evidence from incompatibility between representation of spoken and written morphology. Linguistics, 34, 1219–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2005). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Shlesinger, Y. (2001). Vowel reduction in Modern Hebrew: Traces of the past and current variation. Folia Linguistica, 35, 371–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2004). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, O., Nir-Sagiv, B., Kishon-Rabin, L., & Ravid, D. (2009). Prosodic patterns in Hebrew child-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 36(3), 629–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shany, M., Laxman, D., Shalem, S., Bahat., A., & Zieger, T. (2006). Alef ad taf; Manual. [Alef to Taf: Manual.] Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute.

  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L., & Blum, P. (2005). Syllable splitting in literate and preliterate Hebrew speakers: Onsets and rimes or bodies and codas? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 182–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D., & Levin, I. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 89–111). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimron, J. (1993). The role of vowels in reading: A review of studies of English and Hebrew. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimron, J. (1999). The role of vowel signs in Hebrew: Beyond word recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimron, J., & Sivan, T. (1994). Reading proficiency and orthography: Evidence from Hebrew and English. Language Learning, 44, 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (2004). U-Shaped interest in U-shaped development–and what it means. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorstad, G. (1991). The effect of orthography on the acquisition of literacy skills. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Hummer, P. (1990). How German speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Department of Learning Disabilities and Edmond J. Safra Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, The University of Haifa, Mt. Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel

    Michal Shany & Tami Katzir

  2. Department of Communication Disorders, Tel Aviv University, P.O Box 39040, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Amalia Bar-On

Authors
  1. Michal Shany
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amalia Bar-On
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tami Katzir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Shany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shany, M., Bar-On, A. & Katzir, T. Reading different orthographic structures in the shallow-pointed Hebrew script: a cross-grade study in elementary school. Read Writ 25, 1217–1238 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9314-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9314-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation