Skip to main content
Log in

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Bulgarian version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study was the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory in Bulgarian language (DHI-BG).

Methods

Ninety-seven vestibular patients (19 men and 78 women, mean age 45.08 ± 13.85 years) took part in the investigation. All participants were asked to fill in the DHI-BG. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach’s alpha and item-total correlation, reproducibility by calculating Bland–Altman’s limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Associations were estimated by Spearman’s correlation coefficients.

Results

The Cronbach’s alpha for the total score, functional, physical and emotional subscales of DHI-BG were 0.88, 0.75, 0.72 and 0.81. The floor and ceiling effects of the DHI-BG total scale were evaluated with respect to the limits of agreement which were ±9.4–14.53 points. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for all scale and subscales were higher than the recommended value of 0.75 and determined good test–retest reliability. The range of items correlation for DHI-BG was from 0.27 (item 12) to 0.72 (item 3). No significant differences were observed in the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients between the DHI-BG and the original version, the German and Italian versions of the questionnaire. The most significant difference was observed in comparison with the German version of DHI. Construct validity presented a moderate correlation between Romberg coefficients and DHI-BG scores and strong correlation between all scores of DHI and the self-perceived disability. The results suggest that DHI-BG scores show a good discriminative validity between groups with different levels of self-assessed disability.

Conclusion

The Bulgarian version of the DHI is a reliable and valid tool in assessing the impact of dizziness on the quality of life in Bulgarian vestibular patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Kroenke, K., Hoffman, R. M., & Einstadter, D. (2000). How common are various causes of dizziness? A critical review. Southern Medical Journal, 93, 160–167.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yardley, L., Owen, N., Nazareth, I., et al. (1998). Prevalence and presentation of dizziness in a general practice community sample of working people. British Journal of General Practice, 48, 1131–1135.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuhauser, H. K., von Brevern, M., Radtke, A., et al. (2005). Epidemiology of vestibular vertigo: A neurotologic survey of the general population. Neurology, 65, 898–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson, G. P., & Newmann, C. W. (1990). The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Archives of Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, 116(4), 424–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Honrubia, V., Bell, T. S., Harris, M. R., et al. (1996). Quantitative evaluation of dizziness characteristics and impact on quality of life. American Journal of Otology, 17, 595–602.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jarlsäter, S., & Mattsson, E. (2003). Test of reliability of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory and the activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale for use in Sweden. Advances in Physiotherapy, 5, 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurre, A., Van Gool, C. J. A. W., Bastianen, C. H. G., et al. (2009). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the German version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Otology & Neurotology, 30, 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nola, G., Mastardini, C., Salvi, V., et al. (2010). Validity of Italian adaptation of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and evaluation of the quality of life in patients with acute dizziness. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 30, 190–197.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hufschmidt, A., Dichgans, J., Mauritz, K. H., & Hufschmidt, M. (1980). Some methods and parameters of body sway quantification and their neurological applications. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 228, 135–150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill-Body, K. M., Beniato, M., & Krebs, D. E. (2000). Relationship among balance impairments, functional performance, and disability in people with peripheral vestibular hypofunction. Physical Therapy, 80, 748–758.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank professor Jacobson who his permission and assistance in the process of validating the questionnaire.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spaska Georgieva-Zhostova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgieva-Zhostova, S., Kolev, O.I. & Stambolieva, K. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Bulgarian version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Qual Life Res 23, 2103–2107 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0660-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0660-5

Keywords

Navigation