Skip to main content
Log in

Evacuation behaviour of households and drivers during a tornado

Analysis based on a stated preference survey in Calgary, Canada

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With increasing concerns over the possibility of tornadoes in highly populated areas in Canada, emergency managers are looking into ways to mitigate the impacts of tornadoes. Given that tornadoes can cause enormous destruction, early warnings and proper evacuation actions are critically important in helping save lives. In this paper, a survey was conducted to analyse the evacuation behaviour of households and drivers during a hypothetical tornado warning situation in the city of Calgary, Alberta. Nearly 500 Calgarians took part in the online survey and provided information on how they would respond to tornado warnings after receiving them. This paper presents the results of the survey. Using probit models, the factors influencing these evacuation decisions are identified and discussed in detail. The results of the household evacuation model show the importance of improving awareness about the safest locations during a tornado. It further highlights the need for targeting the population under the age of 30, who are more likely to take unsafe evacuation actions. The model for evacuation of drivers shows that several factors, such as knowing the difference between a watch and a warning, awareness of safe cover, receipt of warnings through natural environmental cues and the level of education, trigger evacuation actions in avoiding a tornado threat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelgawad H, Abdulhai B (2009) Emergency evacuation planning as a network design problem: a critical review. Trans Lett Int J Trans Res 1:41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AEA (2013) Alberta Emergency Alert. Government of Alberta, http://www.emergencyalert.alberta.ca/. Accessed 19 June 2013

  • Bartlett JE, Kotrlik JW, Higgins CC (2001) Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf Techno Learn Perform J 19(1):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard-Boehm RD, Cook MJ (2004) Risk communication and public education in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on the 10th Anniversary of the ‘Black Friday’ Tornado. Int Res Geogra Environ Edu 13:38–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash N, Gladwin H (2007) Evacuation decision making and behavioural responses: individual and household. Nat Hazards Rev 8:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donner WR, Rodriguez H, Diaz W (2012) Tornado warnings in three southern states: a qualitative Analysis of public response patterns. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manag 9(2):1547–7355 ISSN (Online)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotto L, Duchsne L, Etkin D et al (2010) Canadians at risk: our exposure to natural hazards, Canadian assessment of natural hazards project. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury J, Cocking C, Reiche S, Burton A, Schofield D, Hardwick A, Graham D, Langston P (2009) Cooperation versus competition in a mass emergency evacuation: a new laboratory simulation and a new theoretical model. Behav Res Method 41(3):957–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durage SW, Wirasinghe SC, Ruwanpura JY (2013) Comparison of the Canadian and U.S. Tornado detection and warning systems. Nat Hazards 66(1):117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2013) What is Weatheradio? http://www.ec.gc.ca/meteo-weather/. Accessed 19 June 2013

  • Etkin D (1995) Beyond the year 2000, more Tornadoes in Western Canada? Implications from the historical record. Nat Hazards 12:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grazulis T P (1991) Significant Tornadoes, 1880–1989, Vol I, Discussion and analysis, Environmental Films, St. Johnsbury Vt., 526

  • Hammer BO, Schmidlin TW (2001) Vehicle-occupant deaths caused by tornadoes in the United States, 1900–1998. Environ Hazards 2(3):105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression, 3rd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kockelman K, Kweon Y (2002) Driver injury severity: an application of ordered probit models. Accid Anal Prev 34(3):313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak C, Matthews AC (2002) Multinomial logistic regression. Nurs Res 51(6):404–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra K, Kant S (2005) Tropical deforestation: a multinomial logistic model and some country-specific policy prescriptions. For Policy Econ 7:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matyas C, Srinivasan S, Cahyanto I, Thapa B, Pennington-Gray L, Villegas J (2011) Risk perception and evacuation decisions of Florida tourists under hurricane threats: a stated preference analysis. Nat Hazards 59:871–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy P (2010) Prairie and Northern Region Severe Weather Database (1826-2010). Prairie and Arctic Storm Prediction Centre, Environment Canada, CD-ROM

  • Mileti D, O’Brien P (1992) Warning during disaster: normalizing communicated risk. Soc Probl 39(1):40–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monfredo W (2008) Blown away in Greensburg, USA: prediction and analysis of an EF-5 tornado. Weather 63(5):116–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy B, Falkiner L, McBean G et al (2005) Enhancing local level emergency management: the influence of disaster experience and the role of households and neighbourhoods, ICLR Research Paper Series-No 43. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Nirupama N (2012) Risk and vulnerability assessment: a comprehensive approach. Int J Disaster Resilience Built Environ 3(2):103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nirupama N, Maula A (2013) Engaging public for building resilient communities to reduce disaster impact. Nat Hazards Nat Hazards Special Issue Sociol Aspects Nat Disasters 66:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2012) Mobile weather warnings on the way! http://www.noaa.gov/features/03_protecting/wireless_emergency_alerts.html Accessed 6 June 2013

  • Oxendine C, Sonwalkar M, Waters N (2012) A multi-objective, multi-criteria approach to improve situational awareness in emergency evacuation routing using mobile phone data. Trans GIS 16(3):375–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfarr C, Schmid A, Schneider U (2011) Estimating ordered categorical variables using panel data: a generalized ordered probit model with an autofit procedure. J Econ e´conom 54(1):7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson M, Khattak A (2010) Route change decision-making by evacuees facing congestion. Trans Res Rec J Trans Res Board 2196:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidlin TW, King PS, Hammer BO, Ono Y (1998) Behaviour of vehicles during Tornado winds. J Saf Res 29(3):181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidlin TW, Hammer BO, Ono Y, King PS (2009) Tornado shelter-seeking behaviour and tornado shelter options among mobile home residents in the United States. Nat Hazards 48:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz DM, Gruntfest EC, Hayden MH, Benight CC, Drobot S, Barnes LR (2010) Decision making by Austin, Texas, residents in hypothetical Tornado scenarios. Weather Clim Soc 2:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman-Morris K (2010) Tornado warning dissemination and response at a university campus. Nat Hazards 52:623–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan Publications ltd, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • SPC (2013) The Online Tornado FAQ. http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/ Accessed 29 July 2013

  • Tay R, Barua U, Kattan L (2009) Factors contributing to hit-and-run in fatal crashes. Accid Anal Prev 41:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickramaratne S, Ruwanpura JY, Wirasinghe SC (2011) Decision analysis for a tsunami detection system—Case Study: Sri Lanka. Civil Eng Environ Sys 28(4):353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams R (2006) Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. State J 6(1):58–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye Z, Chaudhari J, Booth J, Posadas B (2010) Evaluation of the use of rural transportation infrastructure in evacuation operations. J Trans Saf Sec 2:88–101

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of the Calgary Emergency Management Agency (CEMA), particularly Director of CEMA and Fire Chief Bruce Burrell, in conducting this research, as well as that of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samanthi W. Durage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durage, S.W., Kattan, L., Wirasinghe, S.C. et al. Evacuation behaviour of households and drivers during a tornado. Nat Hazards 71, 1495–1517 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0958-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0958-6

Keywords

Navigation