Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preliminary flood risk assessment: the case of Athens

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flood mapping, especially in urban areas, is a demanding task requiring substantial (and usually unavailable) data. However, with the recent introduction of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC), the need for reliable, but cost effective, risk mapping at the regional scale is rising in the policy agenda. Methods are therefore required to allow for efficiently undertaking what the Directive terms “preliminary flood risk assessment,” in other words a screening of areas that could potentially be at risk of flooding and that consequently merit more detailed attention and analysis. Such methods cannot rely on modeling, as this would require more data and effort that is reasonable for this high-level, screening phase. This is especially true in urban areas, where modeling requires knowledge of the detailed urban terrain, the drainage networks, and their interactions. A GIS-based multicriteria flood risk assessment methodology was therefore developed and applied for the mapping of flood risk in urban areas. This approach quantifies the spatial distribution of flood risk and is able to deal with uncertainties in criteria values and to examine their influence on the overall flood risk assessment. It can further assess the spatially variable reliability of the resulting maps on the basis of the choice of method used to develop the maps. The approach is applied to the Greater Athens area and validated for its central and most urban part. A GIS database of economic, social, and environmental criteria contributing to flood risk was created. Three different multicriteria decision rules (Analytical Hierarchy Process, Weighted Linear Combination and Ordered Weighting Averaging) were applied, to produce the overall flood risk map of the area. To implement this methodology, the IDRISI Andes GIS software was customized and used. It is concluded that the results of the analysis are a reasonable representation of actual flood risk, on the basis of their comparison with historical flood events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. DALYs = Disability Adjusted Life Years: The sum of years of potential life lost due to premature mortality and the years of productive life lost due to disability (source: www.who.int).

References

  • Alkema D (2001) Flood-risk assessment for EIA. Studi Trentini Sci Nat Acta Geol 78:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamford TB, Digman CJ, Balmforth DJ, Waller S, Hunter N (2008) Modelling flood risk, an evaluation of different methods, WaPUG. Org. Autumn Conference, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bana E, Costa CA (1990) Reading in multiple criteria decision aid. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis—an integrated approach. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbrook KF, Lane SN, Waller SG, Bates PD (2004) Two dimensional diffusion wave modelling of flood inundation using a simplified channel representation. Int J River Basin Manag 2(3):211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Kokkalidou A, Makropoulos CK (2005) Supporting the siting of new urban developments for integrated urban water resource management. In: Hlavinek P, Kukharchyk T (eds) Integrated urban water resources management, NATO scientific series. Springer, Berlin, pp 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr RS, Smith GP (2006) Linking 2D and pipe hydraulic models at fine spatial scales. 7th International conference on urban drainage modelling and 4th international conference on water sensitive urban design, vol 2, Melbourne, pp 361–368

  • Carver SJ (1991) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 5:321–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen AS, Hsu MH, Chen TS, Chang TJ (2005) An integrated inundation model for highly developed urban areas. Water Sci Technol 51(2):221–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson RJ, Speight L, Hall JW, Djordjevic S, Savic D, Leandro J (2008) Attribution of flood risk in urban areas. J Hydroinform 10(4):275–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djordjević S, Prodanović D, Maksimović Č, Ivetić M, Savić D (2005) SIPSON–Simulation of Interaction between pipe flow and surface overland flow in networks. Water Sci Technol 52(5):275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • EA (2009) Flooding in wales: a national assessment of flood risk. Environment Agency, Wales, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR (1997) IDRISI for windows, tutorial exercises. Version 2.0, Clark University

  • Eastman JR, Kyem PAK, Toledano J, Jin W (1993) GIS and decision making. UNITAR, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR, Jin W, Kyem PAK, Toledano J (1995) Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 61:539–547

    Google Scholar 

  • ENM (2004) Basic information and proposals for updating the flood protection of Attica. Ministry of Public Works, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans EP, Penning-Rowsell EC, Hall JW (2003) Foresight flood and coastal defence project, phase 1 technical report. Drivers, scenarios and work plan. Office of Science and Technology, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Evelpidou N, Mamassis N, Vassilopoulos A, Makropoulos C, Koutsogiannis D (2009) Flooding in Athens: the kephisos river flood event of 21–22/10/1994. COST22 Conference, Paris, France

  • Floros I (2009). Developing a database for recording flood incidents. MSc Thesis, Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (in Greek)

  • Heywood I, Oliver J, Tomlinson S (1995) Building an exploratory multi-criteria modelling environment for spatial decision support. In: Fisher P (ed) Innovations in GIS2. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins LD (1977) Methods for generating land suitability maps: a comparative evaluation. J Am Inst Plann 34:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter NM, Bates PD, Neelz S, Pender G, Villanueva I, Wright NG et al (2008) Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flooding. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers. Water Manag 161(1):13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • ICE (2001) Learning to live with rivers. Institution of Civil Engineers, London, UK

  • King D (2000) You’re on our own: community vulnerability and the need for awareness and education for predictable natural disasters. J Conting Crisis Manage 8:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamond JE, Proverbs DG, Hammond FN (2009) Accessibility of flood risk insurance in the UK: confusion, competition and complacency. J Risk Res 12(6):825–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos C, Butler D (2006) Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multicriteria decision-making. Environ Model Softw 21(1):69–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos C, Butler D, Maksimovic C (1999) GIS supported evaluation of source control applicability in urban areas. Water Sci Technol 32(9):243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos C, Argyrou E, Memon FA, Butler D (2007) A suitability evaluation tool for siting wastewater treatment facilities in new urban developments. Urban Water J 4(2):61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos CK, Memon FA, Shirley-Smith C, Butler D (2008) Futures: an exploration of scenarios for sustainable urban water management.Water Policy 10(4):345–375. doi:10.2166/wp.2008.014

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, USA

  • Malczewski J (2000) On the use of weighted linear combination method in GIS: common and best practice approaches. Trans GIS 4(1):5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):703–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J, Chapman T, Flegel C, Walters D, Shrubsole D, Healy MA (2003) GIS—multicriteria evaluation with ordered weighted averaging (OWA): case study of developing watershed management strategies. Environ Plan A 35(10):1769–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner F, Meyer V (2006) Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception—challenges for flood damage research. Chap. 13. In: Schanze J, Zeman E, Marsalek J (eds) Flood risk management—hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–167 Nato Science Series

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer V, Scheuer S, Haase D (2008) A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany, Nat hazards 48. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (1995) Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment—theory and applications in ecological economics. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes Correia F, Da Graca Saraiva M, Nunes Da Silva F, Ramos I (1999) Floodplain management in urban developing areas. Part I. Urban growth scenarios and land-use controls. Water Res Manag 13:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ologunorisa TE, Abawua MJ (2005) Flood risk assessment: a review. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 9(1):57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • OPW (Office of Public Works) (2007) Screening of Natura 2000 sites for impacts of arterial drainage maintenance operations. ISSN 1649-9840. Series of ecological assessments on arterial drainage maintenance. No. 1. Office Public Works, 51 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland

  • Rinner C, Malczewski J (2002) Web-enabled spatial decision analysis using ordered weighted averaging (OWA). J Geograph Syst 4(4):385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RPA (2008) Railway procurement agency. Metro north railway order application—further information request. Item 4. Flood Risk Assessment (downloadable from: http://www.dublinmetronorth.ie)

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1992) Decision making for leaders. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer VB (2002) USGS, The national flood frequency program, version 3: a computer program for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods for ungaged sites. Water-Resources Investigations, Report 02-4168, pp 8–10

  • Sayers P, Calvert M (2007) National flood risk assessment for Northern Ireland. Flood mapping strategy (Interim). Report EX 5299. Release 5.0. HR Wallingford

  • Sayers PB, Gouldby BP, Simm JD, Meadowcroft IC, Hall JW (2002) Risk, performance and uncertainty in flood and coastal defence-a review, Defra/EA R&D Technical Report FD2302/TR1

  • Schanze J, Zeman E, Marsalek J (2006) Flood risk management. Hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures, vol 67. Springer, Dordrecht (NL), pp 3–4 (Nato science series—IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences)

  • Schmitt TG, Thomas M, Ettrich N (2004) Analysis and modeling of flooding in urban drainage systems. J Hydrol 299(3–4):300–311. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharada D, Kaveri Devi D, Prasad S, Kumar SS (1997) Modelling flash flood hazard to a railway line: a GIS approach. Geocarto Int 12(3):77–82. doi:10.1080/10106049709354600 Taylor & Francis

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Nirupama A (2005) A spatial multi-objective decision-making under uncertainty for water resources management. J Hydroinform 7(2):117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (1996) Environmental hazards. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Strager MP, Rosenberger RS (2006) Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: weights and measures in spatial MCA. Ecol Econ 57(13):627–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapsell S, Penning-Rowsell EC, Tunstall SM, Wilson TL (2002) Vulnerability to flooding: health and social dimensions. Philos Transact R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 360:1511–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thinh NX, Hedel R (2004) A fuzzy compromise programming environment for the ecological evaluation of land use options. Conference proceedings of the Enviro Info 2004

  • Tkach RJ, Simonovic SP (1997) A new approach to multi-criteria decision making in water resources. J Geogr Inform Decis Anal 1(1):25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin CD (1990) Geographical information systems and cartographic modeling. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • HR Wallingford (2002) Risk performance and uncertainty in flood and coastal defence—A review. SR587 (Second Draft)

  • Yager RR (1993) Non-numeric multi-criteria multi-person decision making. Group Decis Negot 2:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin G, Akyurek Z (2004) Analysing flood vulnerable areas with multicriteria evaluation. XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey 12–23 July

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 5, Iroon Polytechniou Str, Athens, Greece

    Georgia Kandilioti & Christos Makropoulos

Authors
  1. Georgia Kandilioti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christos Makropoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Makropoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kandilioti, G., Makropoulos, C. Preliminary flood risk assessment: the case of Athens. Nat Hazards 61, 441–468 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9930-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9930-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation