Skip to main content
Log in

Apparent diffusion coefficient in glioblastoma with PNET-like components, a GBM variant

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) with primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)-like (GBM-PNET) components is a rare variant of GBM. Recent studies describe PNET-like clinical behavior in these patients—with significantly increased propensity for CSF dissemination and a benefit of “PNET-like” chemotherapy. The imaging appearance of GBM-PNET is not well-described and given areas of marked cellularity in the PNET components one might expect significantly reduced diffusion on MRI. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the diffusion characteristics in GBM-PNET and compare them with conventional GBMs. Nine patients with surgical specimens yielding GBM-PNET were identified from the UCSF Pathology files. MR images of these patients were reviewed retrospectively. DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging) sequences were analyzed with multiple regions of interests placed within the tumor, and ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) values were measured. Results were compared to previously published ADC values in pathology-proven conventional GBM cases from our institution. Reduced ADC was seen in GBM-PNET (mean 581 × 10−6 mm2/s, range 338–817) compared to previously published mean of 1,030 × 10−6 mm2/s in the enhancing components of conventional GBMs. We report substantially reduced ADC values in GBM-PNETs compared to conventional GBMs. If demonstrated in a larger sample, when areas of marked reduced diffusion are seen in a suspected GBM, MRI may appropriately direct tissue sampling and can advocate a thorough search for PNET-like components on histopathology. These patients may have a higher chance of developing CSF dissemination and may benefit from “PNET-like” platinum-based chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perry A, Miller CR, Gujrati M, Scheithauer BW, Zambrano SC, Jost SC, Raghavan R, Qian J, Cochran EJ, Huse JT, Holland EC, Burger PC, Rosenblum MK (2009) Malignant gliomas with primitive neuroectodermal tumor-like components: a clinicopathologic and genetic study of 53 cases. Brain Pathol 19:81–90. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00167.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Joseph NM, Phillips J, Dahiya S et al (2013) Diagnostic implications of IDH1-R132H and OLIG2 expression patterns in rare and challenging glioblastoma variants. Mod Pathol 26:315–326. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2012.173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rumboldt Z, Camacho DL, Lake D, Welsh CT, Castillo M (2006) Apparent diffusion coefficients for differentiation of cerebellar tumors in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1362–1369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pillai S, Singhal A, Byrne AT, Dunham C, Cochrane DD, Steinbok P (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging and pathological correlation in pediatric medulloblastomas-”They are not always restricted!”. Childs Nerv Syst 27:1407–1411. doi:10.1007/s00381-011-1499-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zacharia TT, Law M, Naidich TP, Leeds NE (2008) Central nervous system lymphoma characterization by diffusion-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopy. J Neuroimag 18:411–417. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00231.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Valles FE, Perez-Valles CL, Regalado S, Barajas RF, Rubenstein JL, Cha S (2013) Combined diffusion and perfusion MR imaging as biomarkers of prognosis in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:35–40. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3165

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitis O, Altay H, Calli C, Yunten N, Akalin T, Yurtseven T (2005) Minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain tumors. Eur J Radiol 55:393–400. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murakami R, Hirai T, Kitajima M, Fukuoka H, Toya R, Nakamura H, Kuratsu J, Yamashita Y (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging of pilocytic astrocytomas: usefulness of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value for differentiation from high-grade gliomas. Acta Radiol 49:462–467. doi:10.1080/02841850801918555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Murakami R, Hirai T, Sugahara T, Fukuoka H, Toya R, Nishimura S, Kitajima M, Okuda T, Nakamura H, Oya N, Kuratsu J, Yamashita Y (2009) Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters: superiority of a one- versus two-parameter pilot method. Radiology 251:838–845. doi:10.1148/radiol.2513080899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, Ikushima I, Shigematu Y, Hirai T, Okuda T, Liang L, Ge Y, Komohara Y, Ushio Y, Takahashi M (1999) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:53–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fouladi M, Gajjar A, Boyett JM, Walter AW, Thompson SJ, Merchant TE, Jenkins JJ, Langston JW, Liu A, Kun LE, Heideman RL (1999) Comparison of CSF cytology and spinal magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of leptomeningeal disease in pediatric medulloblastoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor. J Clin Oncol 17:3234–3237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jakacki RI, Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Albright AL, Allen JC, Geyer JR, Rorke LB, Stanley P, Stevens KR, Wisoff J et al (1995) Survival and prognostic factors following radiation and/or chemotherapy for primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the pineal region in infants and children: a report of the Childrens Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 13:1377–1383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao MS, Mehta MP, Boyett JM, Li H, Donahue B, Rorke LB, Zeltzer PM (1997) The effect of M-stage on patterns of failure in posterior fossa primitive neuroectodermal tumors treated on CCG-921: a phase III study in a high-risk patient population. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:469–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Finlay JL, Albright AL, Rorke LB, Milstein JM, Allen JC, Stevens KR, Stanley P, Li H, Wisoff JH, Geyer JR, McGuire-Cullen P, Stehbens JA, Shurin SB, Packer RJ (1999) Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children’s Cancer Group 921 randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 17:832–845

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barajas RF Jr, Hodgson JG, Chang JS, Vandenberg SR, Yeh RF, Parsa AT, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Dillon WP, Cha S (2010) Glioblastoma multiforme regional genetic and cellular expression patterns: influence on anatomic and physiologic MR imaging. Radiology 254:564–576. doi:10.1148/radiol.09090663

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109. doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarkar C, Deb P, Sharma MC (2005) Recent advances in embryonal tumours of the central nervous system. Childs Nerv Syst 21:272–293. doi:10.1007/s00381-004-1066-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnston DL, Keene DL, Lafay-Cousin L, Steinbok P, Sung L, Carret AS, Crooks B, Strother D, Wilson B, Odame I, Eisenstat DD, Mpofu C, Zelcer S, Huang A, Bouffet E (2008) Supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors: a Canadian pediatric brain tumor consortium report. J Neurooncol 86:101–108. doi:10.1007/s11060-007-9440-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Song X, Allen RA, Dunn ST, Fung KM, Farmer P, Gandhi S, Ranjan T, Demopoulos A, Symons M, Schulder M, Li JY (2011) Glioblastoma with PNET-like components has a higher frequency of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation and likely a better prognosis than primary glioblastoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 4:651–660

  20. Stark AM, Nabavi A, Mehdorn HM, Blomer U (2005) Glioblastoma multiforme-report of 267 cases treated at a single institution. Surg Neurol 63:162–169; discussion 169 doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2004.01.028

  21. Hong TS, Mehta MP, Boyett JM, Donahue B, Rorke LB, Zeltzer PM (2005) Patterns of treatment failure in infants with primitive neuroectodermal tumors who were treated on CCG-921: a phase III combined modality study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 45:676–682. doi:10.1002/pbc.20184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khayal IS, Vandenberg SR, Smith KJ, Cloyd CP, Chang SM, Cha S, Nelson SJ, McKnight TR (2011) MRI apparent diffusion coefficient reflects histopathologic subtype, axonal disruption, and tumor fraction in diffuse-type grade II gliomas. Neuro Oncol 13:1192–1201. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nor122

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chawla A, Emmanuel JV, Seow WT, Lou J, Teo HE, Lim CC (2007) Paediatric PNET: pre-surgical MRI features. Clin Radiol 62:43–52. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2006.09.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y et al (2008) Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology 249:624–630. doi:10.1148/radiol.2492071681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saad Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, S., Joseph, N.M., Perry, A. et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient in glioblastoma with PNET-like components, a GBM variant. J Neurooncol 119, 353–360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1485-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1485-3

Keywords

Navigation