Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deciphering rangeland transformation—complex dynamics obscure interpretations of woody plant encroachment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Woody plant encroachment—the conversion of grasslands to woodlands—is among the greatest challenges faced by rangelands worldwide. Yet this phenomenon is poorly understood, and complex land use dynamics make interpreting the timing and extent of land cover changes a global challenge.

Objectives

For many regions, the true degree and rate of historical change in woody cover and cropland remain unknown. We quantify these processes and explore the effects of prior cultivation on woody plant distribution.

Methods

In the Lampasas Cut Plain, USA, we measured rangeland transformation using digital classification of aerial imagery 1937–2012. Our study is the first to use data of such high spatial and temporal resolution to address this question at this scale. We also provide some of the first documentation of dramatic regional cropland abandonment.

Results

Although total woody cover remained almost unchanged (1937: 28%, 2012: 27 %), woody cover underwent a major redistribution across the landscape. Formerly open areas attained much greater levels of woody cover, and previously wooded areas lost woody cover. As cropland area declined by 78 %, woody plants invaded former croplands more slowly than the rangeland portions of the area (0.1 % year−1 vs. 0.3 % year−1, respectively).

Conclusions

These findings conflict with widely held assumptions and suggest that woody plant encroachment is more nuanced than often recognized. Multiple dynamics and past conditions interact in complex ways to produce landscape change. Because perceptions of encroachment determine how we respond to this challenge, great care should be taken in interpreting observed woody plant encroachment of the world’s rangelands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison JE (1991) Soil survey of Lampasas County. US Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C, Texas, p 154

    Google Scholar 

  • Allred BW (1949) Distribution and control of several woody plants in Texas and Oklahoma. J. Range Manage. 2(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer S (1994) Woody plant encroachment into southwestern grasslands and savannas: rates, patterns and proximate causes. In: Vavra M, Laycock WA, Pieper RD (eds) Ecological implications of livestock herbivory in the west. Society for Range Management, Denver, pp 13–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer SR, Davies KR, Fulbright TE, McDaniel KC, Wilcox BP, Predick KI, Briske DD (2011) Brush management as a rangeland conservation strategy: a critical evaluation. In: US Department of Agriculture (ed) Conservation benefits of rangeland practices: assessment, recommendations, and knowledge gaps. US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C, pp 105–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Asner G, Archer S, Hughes RF, Ansley RJ, Wessman C (2003) Net changes in regional woody vegetation cover and carbon storage in Texas Drylands, 1937–1999. Glob Change Biol 9:316–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asner G, Elmore AJ, Olander LP, Martin RE, Harris AT (2004) Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29(1):261–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer SG, Kitchen DJ, Blair JM, Rice CW (2002) Changes in ecosystem structure and function along a chronosequence of restored grasslands. Ecol Appl 12(6):1688–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia L, Minchin P, Pritchett D (2002) Sixteen years of old-field succession and reestablishment of a bottomland hardwood forest in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Wetlands 22(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin K, Domon G, Bouchard A (2005) Vegetation composition and succession of abandoned farmland: effects of ecological, historical and spatial factors. Landscape Ecol. 20(6):627–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg MD, Sorice MG, Wilcox BP, Angerer JP, Rhodes EC, Fox WE (2015) Demographic changes drive woody plant cover trends—an example from the great plains. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 68(4):315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65(1):2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray WL (1904) Forest resources of Texas. US Department of Agriculture Bureau of Forestry, Washington, D.C.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breshears DD (2006) The grassland-forest continuum: trends in ecosystem properties for woody plant mosaics? Front Ecol Environ 4(2):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs JM, Hoch GA, Johnson LC (2002) Assessing the rate, mechanisms, and consequences of the conversion of tallgrass prairie to Juniperus virginiana forest. Ecosystems 5(6):578–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs JM, Knapp AK, Blair JM, Heisler JL, Hoch GA, Lett MS, McCarron JK (2005) An ecosystem in transition: causes and consequences of the conversion of mesic grassland to shrubland. Bioscience 55(3):243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs JM, Spielmann KA, Schaafsma H, Kintigh KW, Kruse M, Morehouse K, Schollmeyer K (2006) Why ecology needs archaeologists and archaeology needs ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 4(4):180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briske DD, Fuhlendorf SD, Smeins FE (2003) Vegetation dynamics on rangelands: a critique of the current paradigms. J Appl Ecol 40(4):601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DG, Johnson KM, Loveland TR, Theobald DM (2005) Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecol Appl 15(6):1851–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning DM, Archer SR, Byrne AT (2009) Field validation of 1930s aerial photography: what are we missing? J Arid Environ 73(9):844–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning DM, Laliberte AS, Rango A (2010) Temporal dynamics of shrub proliferation: linking patches to landscapes. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(6):913–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BD, Stafford Smith DM, Ash AJ, Fuhrer J, Gifford RM, Hiernaux P, Howden SM, Jones MB, Ludwig JA, Manderscheid R, Morgan JA, Newton PCD, Nösberger J, Owensby CE, Soussana JF, Tuba Z, Zuo Zhong C (2000) A synthesis of recent global change research on pasture and rangeland production: reduced uncertainties and their management implications. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82(1–3):39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez-Ramirez F, Slack RD (1994) Effects of avian foraging and post-foraging behavior on seed dispersal patterns of Ashe juniper. Oikos 71(1):40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clower DF (1980) Soil survey of Brown and Mills Counties. US Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C, Texas, p 181

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge BR, Engle DM, Fuhlendorf SD (2007) Markov models of land cover dynamics in a southern Great Plains grassland region. Landscape Ecol. 22(9):1383–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge BR, Engle DM, Fuhlendorf SD, Masters RE, Gregory MS (2001) Landscape cover type and pattern dynamics in fragmented southern Great Plains grasslands, USA. Landscape Ecol. 16(8):677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer VA (2007) Old fields as complex systems: new concepts for describing the dynamics of abandoned farmland. In: Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Old fields: dynamics and restoration of abandoned farmland. Island Press, Washington, pp 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale V, Archer S, Chang M, Ojima D (2005) Ecological impacts and mitigation strategies for rural land management. Ecol Appl 15(6):1879–1892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Steven D (1991) Experiments on mechanisms of tree establishment in old-field succession: seedling emergence. Ecology 72(3):1066–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denevan WM (1992) The Pristine Myth: the landscape of the Americas in 1492. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 82(3):369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond DD, Rowell GA, Keddyhector DP (1995) Conservation of Ashe juniper (Juniperus-ashei Buchholz) woodlands of the central Texas Hill-Country. Nat. Areas J. 15(2):189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond MA (2007) Regional dynamics of grassland change in the western Great Plains. Gt Plains Res 17:133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond MA, Auch RF, Karstensen KA, Sayler KL, Taylor JL, Loveland TR (2012) Land change variability and human-environment dynamics in the United States Great Plains. Land Use Policy 29(3):710–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyksterhuis EJ (1949) Condition and management of range land based on quantitative ecology. J. Range Manage. 2(3):104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge DJ, Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Roger E, Reynolds JF, Whitford WG (2011) Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning: towards a global synthesis. Ecol Lett 14(7):709–722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Engle DM, Kulbeth JD (1992) Growth dynamics of crowns of eastern redcedar at 3 locations in Oklahoma. J. Range Manage. 45:301–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster JH (1917) The spread of timbered areas in central Texas. J Forest 15(4):442–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler NL, Simmons MT (2009) Savanna dynamics in central Texas: just succession? Appl Veg Sci 12(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes LS, Lunt ID, Smallbone LT, Morgan JW (2011) Old field colonization by native trees and shrubs following land use change: could this be Victoria’s largest example of landscape recovery? Ecol Manag Restor 12(1):31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbes C, Adhikari S, Rostant L, Southworth J, Qiu Y (2010) Application of object based classification and high resolution satellite imagery for savanna ecosystem analysis. Remote Sens 2(12):2748–2772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill DS, Marks PL (1991) Tree and shrub seedling colonization of old fields in central New York. Ecol Monogr 61(2):183–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno TE, Escudero A, Delgado A, Valladares F (2012) Previous land use alters the effect of climate change and facilitation on expanding woodlands of Spanish juniper. Ecosystems 15(4):564–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall MT (1955) Comparison of juniper populations on an Ozark glade and old fields. Ann Mo Bot Gard 42(2):171–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden CP (1996) Interrelationships between land abandonment and land degradation: a case from the Ecuadorian Andes. Mt Res Dev 16(3):274–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Bond WJ, Trollope WSW (2000) Fire, resprouting and variability: a recipe for grass–tree coexistence in savanna. J Ecol 88(2):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Cramer VA (2007) Why old fields? socioeconomic and ecological causes and consequences of land abandonment. In: Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Old fields: dynamics and restoration of abandoned farmland. Island Press, Washington, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshino A, Tamura K, Fujimaki H, Asano M, Ose K, Higashi T (2009) Effects of crop abandonment and grazing exclusion on available soil water and other soil properties in a semi-arid Mongolian grassland. Soil Tillage Res 105(2):228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt JER Jr, Everitt JH, Ritchie JC, Moran MS, Booth DT, Anderson GL, Clark PE, Seyfried MS (2003) Applications and research using remote sensing for rangeland management. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69(6):675–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs BF (2011) Spatial patterns and ecological drivers of historic piñon–juniper woodland expansion in the American southwest. Ecography 34(6):1085–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Bychkov TG, Bean JL, Holmes WM (1984) Texas, a geography. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • King DM, Skirvin SM, Collins CDH, Moran MS, Biedenbender SH, Kidwell MR, Weltz MA, Diaz-Gutierrez A (2008) Assessing vegetation change temporally and spatially in southeastern Arizona. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2006WR005850

    Google Scholar 

  • Knick ST, Rotenberry JT (2000) Ghosts of habitats past: contribution of landscape change to current habitats used by shrubland birds. Ecology 81(1):220–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knops JMH, Tilman D (2000) Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment. Ecology 81(1):88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte AS, Rango A, Havstad KM, Paris JF, Beck RF, McNeely R, Gonzalez AL (2004) Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico. Remote Sens Environ 93(1–2):198–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YY, Shao MA (2006) Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China. J Arid Environ 64(1):77–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveland TR, Acevedo W (2006) Land cover change in the Eastern United States. Land Cover Trends Project. United States Geological Survey, Center for Earth Observations and Science, Sioux Falls. http://landcovertrends.usgs.gov/east/regionalSummary.html. Accessed 19 Nov 2013

  • Ludwig JA, Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, Tongway DJ, Imeson AC (2005) Vegetation patches and runoff-erosion as interacting ecohydrological processes in semiarid landscapes. Ecology 86(2):288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF (2005) Biology, ecology, and management of western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis). Technical Bulletin 152. Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis, p. 82

  • Miller RF, Wigand PE (1994) Holocene changes in semiarid pinyon-juniper woodlands. Bioscience 44(7):465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motzkin G, Foster D, Allen A, Harrod J, Boone R (1996) Controlling site to evaluate history: vegetation patterns of a New England sand plain. Ecol Monogr 66(3):345–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT, Tegner MJ, Johnson EA (1998) Compounded perturbations yield ecological surprises. Ecosystems 1(6):535–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Gutmann MP, Williams SA, Easter M, Ojima D (2005) Ecological impact of historical land-use patterns in the Great Plains: a methodological assessment. Ecol Appl 15(6):1915–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Collins SL, Armesto JJ (1987) Models, mechanisms and pathways of succession. Bot Rev 53(3):335–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt RV, Schoennagel T (2009) An object-oriented approach to assessing changes in tree cover in the Colorado Front Range 1938–1999. For Ecol Manage 258(7):1342–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poznanovic AJ, Falkowski MJ, Maclean AL, Smith AMS, Evans JS (2014) An accuracy assessment of tree detection algorithms in juniper woodlands. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 80(7):627–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prach K, Pyšek P (2001) Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: experience from Central Europe. Ecol Eng 17(1):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramankutty N, Foley JA (1999a) Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 13(4):997–1027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramankutty N, Foley JA (1999b) Estimating historical changes in land cover: North American croplands from 1850 to 1992. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 8(5):381–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramankutty N, Heller E, Rhemtulla J (2010) Prevailing myths about agricultural abandonment and forest regrowth in the United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(3):502–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redcedar Task Force (2002) A strategy for control and utilization of invasive juniper species in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran M, Hanan NP, Scholes RJ, Ratnam J, Augustine DJ, Cade BS, Gignoux J, Higgins SI, Le Roux X, Ludwig F, Ardo J, Banyikwa F, Bronn A, Bucini G, Caylor KK, Coughenour MB, Diouf A, Ekaya W, Feral CJ, February EC, Frost PGH, Hiernaux P, Hrabar H, Metzger KL, Prins HHT, Ringrose S, Sea W, Tews J, Worden J, Zambatis N (2005) Determinants of woody cover in African savannas. Nature 438(7069):846–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Reynolds JF, Cunningham GL, Huenneke LF, Jarrell WM, Virginia RA, Whitford WG (1990) Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247(4946):1043–1048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes RJ, Archer SR (1997) Tree-grass interactions in savannas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28(1):517–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöholm H, Reynders MI, Ffolliott P (1989) The arid environments. Arid Zone Forestry: A Guide for Field Technicians. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 150 pp

  • Smeins FE, Fuhlendorf SD (1997) Biology and ecology of Ashe juniper. In: Taylor Jr CA (ed) Juniper symposium, San Angelo, Texas. Texas Agricultural Extension Service

  • Smeins FE, Merrill LB (1988) Long-term change in a semi-arid grassland. In: Amos BB, Gehlbach FR (eds) Edwards Plateau vegetation—plant ecological studies in central Texas. Baylor University Press, Waco, pp 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorice MG, Kreuter UP, Wilcox BP, Fox WE (2012) Classifying land-ownership motivations in central, Texas, USA: a first step in understanding drivers of large-scale land cover change. J Arid Environ 80:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swetnam TW, Betancourt JL (1998) Mesoscale disturbance and ecological response to decadal climatic variability in the American Southwest. J Clim 11(12):3128–3147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board (2005) State brush control plan. Texas, Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board, p 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Twidwell D, Wonkka CL, Taylor CA, Zou CB, Twidwell JJ, Rogers WE (2013) Drought-induced woody plant mortality in an encroached semi-arid savanna depends on topoedaphic factors and land management. Appl Veg Sci 17(1):42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Auken OW (2000) Shrub invasions of North American semiarid grasslands. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:197–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Auken OW, Jackson JT, Jurena PN (2005) Survival and growth of Juniperus seedlings in Juniperus woodlands. Plant Ecol 175(2):245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker MJ, Kelly NM (2004) Ranchers vs. ranchettes in California’s oak rangelands. Rangelands 26(2):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waisanen PJ, Bliss NB (2002) Changes in population and agricultural land in conterminous United States counties, 1790 to 1997. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 16(4):1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weniger D (1984) The explorers’ Texas: the lands and waters. Eakin Publications, Austin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank J. McAlister for supplying local landscape information and other technical support. This work was supported by USDA-NIFA Managed Ecosystems grant 2011-68002-30015, USDA-NIFA National Needs Program grant 2009-38420-05631, NSF-CNH grant 413900, and a Tom Slick Graduate Research Fellowship from the Texas A&M University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew D. Berg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berg, M.D., Wilcox, B.P., Angerer, J.P. et al. Deciphering rangeland transformation—complex dynamics obscure interpretations of woody plant encroachment. Landscape Ecol 31, 2433–2444 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0412-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0412-8

Keywords

Navigation