Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A novel approach for classification of earthquake ground-motion records

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new clustering procedure based on K-means and self-organizing map (SOM) network algorithms for classification of earthquake ground-motion records. Six scalar indicators are used in data analysis for describing the frequency content features of earthquake ground motions, named as the average spectral period (T avg ), the mean period (T m ), the smoothed spectral predominant period (T 0), the characteristic period (T 4.3), the predominant period based on velocity spectrum (T gSv ), and the shape factor (Ω). Different clustering validity indexes were applied to determine the best estimates of the number of clusters on real and synthetic data. Results showed the high performance of proposed procedure to reveal salient features of complex seismic data. The comparison between the results of clustering analyses recommend the smoothed spectral predominant period as an effective indicator to describe ground-motion classes. The results also showed that K-means algorithm has better performance than SOM algorithm in identification and classification procedure of ground-motion records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alimoradi A, Pezeshk S, Naeim F, Frigui H (2005) Fuzzy pattern classification of strong ground motion records. J Earthq Eng 9(3):307–302

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, prepared for the SAC joint venture, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.

  • Boore D (2003) Prediction of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160:635–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragato PL, Laurenzano G, Barnab C (2007) Automatic zonation of urban areas based on the similarity of h/v spectral ratios. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1404–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Rathje E, Augello AJ, Merry SM (1998) Simplified seismic design procedure for geosynthetic-lined, solid-waste landfills. Geosynthet Int 5(1–2):203–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brun M, Sima C, Hua J, Lowey J, Carroll B (2007) Model-based evaluation of clustering validation measures. Pattern Recogn 40:807–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (1997) Edition NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, developed for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA302/303. Washington. D.C

  • Calinski T, Harabasz J (1974) A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat 3:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Carniel R, Barbui L, Malisan P (2009) Improvement of HVSR technique by self-organizing map (SOM) analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:1097–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Jaradat SA, Banerjee N, Tanaka TS, Ko MSH, Zhang MQ (2002) Evaluation and comparison of clustering algorithms in anglyzing ES cell gene expression data. Stat Sin 12:241–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Craifaleanu I (2011) Investigation of the frequency content of ground motions recorded during strong Vrancea earthquakes, based on deterministic and stochastic indices, International conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2011, Leuven, Belgium, July 4–6, paper no. MS16–832

  • Craifaleanu I (2012) An assessment of relevance of parameters used for ground motion frequency content characterization with application to Vrancea subcrustal earthquakes, 15 World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, 15WCEE, Lisbon, September 24–28

  • Davies DL, Bouldin DW (1979) Cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1(2):95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos E (2011) Seismic response analysis of skew bridges with pounding deck–abutment joints. Eng Struct 33(3):813–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn JC (1974) Well separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. J Cybernetica 4:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elia G, Rouainia M (2013) Seismic performance of earth embankment using simple and advanced numerical approaches. J Geotech Geoenviron 139(7):1115–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahjan YM (2008) Selection and scaling of real earthquake accelerograms to fit the Turkish design spectra. Teknik Dergi 19(3):4423–4444

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P, Vidic T, Fischinger M (1990) A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 9(5):236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkidi M, Batistakis Y, Vazirgiannis M (2001) On clustering validation techniques. J Intell Inf Syst 17:107–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock J, Bommer JJ (2006) A state-of-knowledge review of the influence of strong-motion duration on structural damage. Earthquake Spectra 22(3):827–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan JA (1975) Clustering algorithms. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) Algorithm AS 136: a k-means clustering algorithm. Appl Stat 28(1):100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert L, Schultz J (1976) Quadratic assignment as a general data-analysis strategy. Br J Math Stat Psychol 29:190–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino I, Cornell CA (2005) Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthquake Spectra 21(3):685–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram N, Baker J (2010) Efficient sampling and data reduction techniques for probabilistic seismic lifeline risk assessment. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn 39:1109–1131

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane DL, Shearer PM, Goertz-Allmann BP, Vernon FL (2013) Rupture directivity of small earthquakes at Parkfield. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karavasilis T, Seo C, Makris N (2011) Dimensional response analysis of bilinear systems subjected to non-pulselike earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng ASCE 137(5):600–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsanos EI, Sextos AG, Manolis GD (2010) Selection of earthquake ground motion records: a state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klose CH (2006) Self-organizing maps for geoscientific data analysis: geological interpretation of multidimensional geophysical data. Comput Geosci 10:265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler A, Ohrnberger M, Scherbaum F (2010) Unsupervised pattern recognition in continuous seismic wavefield records using self-organizing maps. Geophys J Int 182:1619–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T (1981) Automatic formation of topological maps of pattern in a self–organizing system, Proceedings of the 2nd Scandinavian conference on image analysis, pattern recognition society of Finland

  • Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps. Springer, New York p.501

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski WJ, Lai YT (1985) A criterion for determining the number of groups in a data set using sum-of-squares clustering. Biometrics 44:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Castro J, Stafford P, Elghazouli A (2011) Influence of the mean period of ground motion on the inelastic dynamic response of single and multi degree of freedom systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40(3):237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyuk HS, Yildirim E, Dogan E, Horasan G (2011) An unsupervised learning algorithm: application to the discrimination of seismic events and quarry blasts in the vicinity of Istanbul. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyuk HS, Yildirim E, Dogan E, Horasan G (2012) Application of k-means and Gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in Istanbu. Nonlin Processes Geophys 19:411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon O-S, Elnashai A (2006) The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Eng Struct 28(2):289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon O-S, Sextos AG, Elnashai A, (2008) Liquefaction-dependent fragility relation-ships of complex bridge-foundation-soil systems. In: Proceedings of international conference on earthquake engineering and disaster mitiga- tion. Jakarta, Indonesia

  • Lopez-Caballero F, Modaressi Farahmand-Razavi A (2008) Numerical simulation of liquefaction effects on seismic SSI. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(2):85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madahizadeh R, Allamehzadeh M (2009) Prediction of aftershocks distribution using artificial neural networks and its application on the may 12, 2008 Sichuan earthquake. JSEE 11(3):111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda E (1993) Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra. J Struct Eng 119(5):1319–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Esteban A, MartÕnez-àlvarez F, Troncoso A, Justo JJ, Rubio-Escudero C (2010) Pattern recognition to forecast seismic time series. Expert Syst Appl 37:8333–8342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa H, Udagawa SH (2009) A method to estimate the phase velocities of microtremors using a time-frequency analysis and its applications. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2A):774–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeim F, Alimoradi A, Pezeshk S (2004) Selection and scaling of ground motion time histories for structural design using genetic algorithm. Earthquake Spectra 20(2):413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard KS, Vander Laan MJ (2002) A method to identify significant clusters in gene expression data”, U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series, p. 107

  • Ramdani F, Kettani O, Tadili B (2015) Evidence for subduction beneath Gibraltar arc and Andean regions from k-means earthquake centroids. J Seismol 19(1):41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Antonakos G (2011) A unified model for predicting earthquake-induced sliding displacements of rigid and flexible slopes. Eng Geol 122(1–2):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Abrahamson NA, Bray JD (1998) Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions. J Geotech Geoenviron 124(2):150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Faraj F, Russell S, Bray JD (2004) Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 20(1):119–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman K, Burton PW, Weatherill GA (2014) K-means cluster analysis and seismicity partitioning for Pakistan. J Seismol 18(3):401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendon E, Abundez I, Arizmendi A, Quiroz EM (2011) Internal versus external cluster validation indexes. Int J Comput Commun 5:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy R, Thakur P, Chakroborty S (2014) Scaling of ground motions and its applications to plan-asymmetric structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 57:46–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Garcia J, Miranda E (2005) Performance-based assessment of existing structures accounting for residual displacements, Report No. 153, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California

  • Selim SZ, Ismail MA (1984) K-means type algorithms: a generalized convergence theorem and characterization of local optimality. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JP, Chiou S-J, Bray JD, Somerville PG, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (2001) Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance based design, Report No.PEER-2001/09, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, September, 229 pp

  • Tarvainen M (1999) Recognizing explosion sites with a self-organizing network for unsupervised learning. Phys Earth Planet Int 113(1–4):143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tso WK, Zhu TJ, Heidebrecht AC (1992) Engineering implication of ground motion a/V ratio. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11(3):133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson N (2006) Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:477–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill G, Burton PW (2009) Delineation of shallow seismic source zones using K-means cluster analysis, with application to the Aegean region. Geophys J Int 176:565–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chen J, Xiong H, Xie M (2009) External validation measures for K-means clustering: a data distribution perspective. Expert Syst Appl 36:6050–6061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S (2015) New models for frequency content prediction of earthquake records based on Iranian ground-motion data. J Seismol 19:831–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Lam NTK (2010) Ground motion modelling in Tehran based on the stochastic method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14(4):525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Tsang H-H (2014) Site class mapping based on earthquake ground motion data recorded by regional seismographic network. Nat Hazards 73:2067–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamani A, Hashemi N (2004) Computer-based self-organized tectonic zoning: a tentative pattern recognition for Iran. Comput Geosci 30:705–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh

Authors
  1. Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S. A novel approach for classification of earthquake ground-motion records. J Seismol 21, 885–907 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9642-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9642-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation