Skip to main content
Log in

Differential Expression of Proteins in Red Pear Following Fruit Bagging Treatment

  • Published:
The Protein Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fruit bagging is a very effective method for study of fruit qualities and anthocyanin synthesis. The characterization of differentially expressed proteins that were isolated from both bagged and normal fruit skin tissue is apparently an essential parameter for understanding the effect of shading on fruit qualities and to understand the mechanism of fruit coloring in Pyrus communis. Proteome maps of both bagged and normal P. communis ‘Placer’ fruit skin were obtained by performing two-dimensional electrophoresis analysis and compared to assess the extent to which protein distribution differed in pear skin. The comparative analysis showed 38 differentially expressed proteins between the two samples: with three protein spots up-regulated and 35 down-regulated in the bagged fruit. Differentially expressed protein spots were subjected to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis and the data compared to that of known proteins to deduce their possible functions. Of these, 21 protein spots were identified and classified into functional classes. These identified proteins were mainly involved in photosynthesis, signal transduction, energy pathway, protein folding and assembly, and carbohydrate and acidity metabolisms, and were under-expressed in bagged fruit skins. This work provides a first characterization of the proteome changes in response to fruit bagging treatment in red pears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2D-PAGE:

Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

IPG:

Immobilized pH gradient

BB:

Bromophenol blue

IEF:

Isoelectric focusing

NCBInr:

National Centre for Biotechnology Information Non-Redundant

Rubisco:

Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

References

  1. Agostini S, Desjobert JM, Pergent G (1998) Phytochemistry 48:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ai XZ, Wang XF, Guo YK, Xing YX (2006) Scientia Agricultura Sinica 39(10):2063–2068(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amarante C, Banks NH, Max S (2002) New Zealand J Crop Horticultural Sci 30: 93–98

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andacht TM, Winn RN (2006) Marine Environ Res 62:156–186

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arakawa O (1988) J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 57:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell RL (1990) In: Moore JN, Ballington JR (eds) Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. International Society for Horticultural Science, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 655–697

  7. Bentley WJ, Viveros M (1992) California Agricu 46:30–32

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bowler C, Chua NH (1994) Plant Cell 6:1529–1541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradford MM (1976) Anal Biochem 72:248–54

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castro AJ, Carapito C, Zorn N, Magné C, Leize E, Van Dorsselaer A, Clément C (2005) J Exp Bot 56:2783–2795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi IM, Moon JS, Yun CJ, Kim SB, Song NH (1996) RDA J Agricultural Sci, Hortic 38:687–693

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cozza R, Chiappetta A, Petrarulo M, Salimonti A, Rende F, Bitonti MB, Innocenti AM (2004) Chemistry and Ecol 20:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dumay O, Costa J, Desjobert JM, Pergent G (2004) Phytochemistry 65(24):3211–3220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng S, Wang Y, Yang S, Xu Y, Chen X (2010) Planta 232(1):245–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang CH, Yu B, Teng YW, Su J, Shu Q, Cheng ZQ, Zeng LQ (2009) Sci Hortic 121:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johns GG, Scott KJ (1989) Aust J Exp Agric 29:727–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ju ZG (1998) Sci Hortic 77:155–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ju ZG, Liu C, Yuan Y (1995) Sci Horti 63:175–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ju ZG, Yuan Y, Liu C, Xin S (1995) Sci Horti 61:215–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ju ZG, Yuan Y, Liu C, Wang Y, Tian X (1997) Sci Horti 70:31–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kellogg EA, Juliano ND (1997) Am J Bot 84:413–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitagawa H, Esguerra EB, Manabe K (1992) Acta Hortic 321:870–875

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lopez JL (2007) Mar Ecol Prog Ser 332:275–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Long JC, Jenkins GI (1998) Plant cell 10:2077–2086

  25. Maayan I, Shaya F, Ratner K, Mani Y, Lavee S, Avidan B, Shahak Y, Ostersetzer-Biran O (2008) Physiol Plant 134(3):547–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mazzuca S, Spadafora A, Filadoro D, Vannini C, Marsoni M, Cozza R, Bracale M, Pangaro T, Innocenti AM (2009) J Expert Mar Biol Ecol 374:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  27. Monte-Corvo L, Cabtrita L, Oliveira C, Leitao J (2000) Genet Res Crop Evol 47:257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Noro S, Kudo N, Kitsuwa T (1989) J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 58:17–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Park OK (2004) J Biochem Mol Ecol 37:133–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Perring MA, Clijsters H (1974) Qualitas Plantarum 23:379–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Proctor JTA, Lougheed EC (1976) HortScience 11:2

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pierantoni L, Cho KH, Shin IS, Chiodini R, Tartarini S, Dondini L, Kang SJ, Sansavini S (2004) Theor Appl Genet 109:1519–1524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pedreschi R, Hertog M, Robben J, Noben JP, Nicolai BM (2008) Postharvest Biol Technol 50:110–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pedreschi R, Vanstreels E, Carpentier S, Hertog M, Lammertyn J, Robben J, Noben JP, Swennen R, Vanderleyden J, Nicolai BM (2007) Proteomics 7:2083–2099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ritenour M, Schrader L, Kammereck R, Donahue R, Edwards G (1997) Horti Sci 32:272

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saravan RS, Rose JKC (2004) Proteomics 4:2522–2532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Seidler A (1996) Biochim Biophys Acta 1277:35–60

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sheoran IS, Olson DJH, Ross ARS, Sawhney VK (2005) Proteomics 5:3752–3764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Scott KJ, Wills RBH, Rippon LE (1971) Trop Agric 48:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  40. Song GC, Song NH (1993) RDA Journal of Agricultural Science. Horticulture 35:484–489

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tao B, Shu Q, Wang JJ, Zhang WB (2004) Southwest China J Agricultural Sci 47:409–412

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thomas LA, Sehata MJ, Preez MG, Rees JG, Ndimba BK (2010) Afr J Biotechnol 9(28):4334–4341

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Thum KE, Kim M, Christopher DA, Mullet JE (2001) Plant cell 13:2747–2760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Touchette BW, Burkholder JM (2000) J Expert Mar Biol Ecol 250:163–205

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tsugita A, Kamo M (1999) Methods Mol Biol 112:95–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Vitrac X, Larronde F, Krisa S, Decendit A, Deffeux G, Mérillon JM (2000) Phytochemistry 53:659–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang CQ, Zhang YF, LT (2005) Physiologia Plantarum 124:260–266

  48. Wang SM, Gao HJ, Zhang XB (2002) Acta Hortic Sinica 29:263–265 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yao YX, Li M, Zhai H, You CX, Hao YJ (2011) J Plant Physiol 168:474–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Yang WH, Zhu XC, Bu JH, Hua GB, Wang HC, Huang XM (2009) Sci Hortic 120:194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang WB, Zhang JR, Li XL, Shu Q, Zeng YW (1997) South China Fruits 26:38–39

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zivy M, De VD (2000) Plant Mol Biol 44:575–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank xian-sheng zhang, xiang-yu zhao, dao-lin fu, yu-jin hao, yu-xin yao for their good advices for the paper writing. The research is supported by National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) (2011CB100606).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuesen Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, S., Chen, X., Zhang, Y. et al. Differential Expression of Proteins in Red Pear Following Fruit Bagging Treatment. Protein J 30, 194–200 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-011-9320-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-011-9320-6

Keywords

Navigation