Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Outcomes Using a Tablet-Based System to Support Glycemic Management Workflow Operations: A Retrospective Observational Study

  • Mobile & Wireless Health
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment of hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes requires glycemic management to maintain the patients’ blood glucose levels within a normal range. We developed a blood glucose management system (BGM) system in 2015, which is a tablet-based workflow support system. This system enables medical staff to continually confirm the physicians’ instructions by measuring the blood glucose levels while using a tablet terminal.

In this study, we examined electronic medical records (EMRs) to evaluate the usage frequency of the BGM system and the time required for the glycemic management workflow in comparison to conventional PC terminals in a large hospital setting. The data includes 197,927 blood glucose level measurements that were taken in the general wards of Tottori University Hospital between January 2016 and June 2017. The usage frequency of the glycemic management workflow while using the BGM system was 145,864 times (approximately 74% of the total blood glucose measurements). The mean time until the completion of the glycemic management workflow in the case of hyperglycemia was 16 min 33 s, which is 26% shorter than using a PC terminal for treatment that involves injection or infusion (1454 times). The BGM system is proactively utilized by medical staff, thereby improving the operating efficiency. The results of this study indicate that the BGM system installed on tablet terminals can improve the efficiency in large-scale medical institutions that treat patients with diabetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request. This manuscript includes all the available data in this study.

References

  1. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. (2017) IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 128:40-50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, et al. (2011) National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2·7 million participants. The Lancet 378:31-40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Timsit JF, Vesin A, et al. (2010) Selected medical errors in the intensive care unit: results of the IATROREF study: parts I and II. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181:134-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Breuer TG, Meier JJ (2012) Inpatient treatment of type 2 diabetes. Dtsch Arztebl Int 109:466-474.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bloomgarden ZT (2004) Inpatient diabetes control: approaches to treatment. Diabetes Care 27:2272-2277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amori RE, Pittas AG, Siegel RD, et al. (2008) Inpatient medical errors involving glucose-lowering medications and their impact on patients: review of 2,598 incidents from a voluntary electronic error-reporting database. Endocr Pract 14:535-542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hermayer KL, Loftley AS, Reddy S, Narla SN, Epps NA, Zhu Y (2015) Challenges of inpatient blood glucose monitoring: standards, methods, and devices to measure blood glucose. Curr Diab Rep 15:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Quezada A, Juarez-Ramirez R, Jimenez S, Noriega AR, Inzunza S, Garza AA (2017) Usability Operations on Touch Mobile Devices for Users with Autism. J Med Syst 41:184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Houze De l’Aulnoit A, Boudet S, Genin M, et al. (2018) Development of a Smart Mobile Data Module for Fetal Monitoring in E-Healthcare. J Med Syst 42:83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duhm J, Fleischmann R, Schmidt S, Hupperts H, Brandt SA (2016) Mobile Electronic Medical Records Promote Workflow: Physicians' Perspective From a Survey. JMIR mHealth uHealth 4:e70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson C, Henner T, Burkey J (2013) Tablet computers in support of rural and frontier clinical practice. Int J Med Inform 82:1046-1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kei T, Tsuyoshi O, Rie K, et al. (2017) Development and Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Management System for Reducing the Delay in Measurement. Stud Health Technol Inform 245:1058-1062.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Okura T, Teramoto K, Koshitani R, et al. (2018) A Computer-Based Glucose Management System Reduces the Incidence of Forgotten Glucose Measurements: A Retrospective Observational Study. Diabetes Ther 9:1143-1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee J, Han H, Ock M, Lee SI, Lee S, Jo MW (2014) Impact of a clinical decision support system for high-alert medications on the prevention of prescription errors. Int J Med Inform 83:929-940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the participants of this study.

Editorial assistance

We thank Mr. Yuichiro Tomita and Ms. Erika Matsui for their technical assistance. We also wish to thank Editage (https://www.editage.jp/) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Authorship.

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for the authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Authorship contributions

Kei Teramoto participated in the design of the study and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All of the other authors have contributed to the data collection and interpretation, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Open access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Funding

“No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article.” All authors had full access to all of the data in this study and take complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kei Teramoto.

Ethics declarations

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants that were included in the study by the opt-out method.

Disclosures

All of the authors have nothing to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teramoto, K., Okura, T. & Kondo, H. Evaluation of Outcomes Using a Tablet-Based System to Support Glycemic Management Workflow Operations: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Med Syst 44, 167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01636-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01636-0

Keywords

Navigation