Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies using enhanced supraventricular tachycardia discriminators: the ReduceIT study

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are associated with greater healthcare resource utilization, poorer quality-of-life, and higher mortality. We aimed to investigate the performance of enhanced supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) discrimination algorithms (morphology discrimination, rate stability, and sudden or chamber onset) for reducing inappropriate ICD therapies in patients with ICD/cardiac resynchronization therapy devices.

Methods

This prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study (ReduceIT) study took place at 56 sites across Germany and Estonia. Adults at risk of sudden cardiac death undergoing St. Jude Medical™ ICD or CRT-D implantation were included. The primary endpoint was freedom from inappropriate ICD shock at 12 months and was analyzed in the intention to treat (ITT) and per-protocol population.

Results

Overall, 733 patients (65.9 ± 11.4 years) were included, of which 40.9% and 59.1% received a single- and dual-chamber detection device, respectively. During follow-up (median 11.9 [0–21.6] months), 96.3% of patients experienced no inappropriate therapy (ITT). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for VT/VF were 91.9%, 95.5%, and 94.7%, respectively. In the per-protocol population (n = 620), the proportion of patients free from inappropriate shock at 12 months was 98.4% (n = 610; 95% CI 97.1–99.2%) and exceeded the expected value of 93% (p < 0.0001) which was derived from the rates in the SPICE, ATPonFastVT, and DECREASE studies. A total of 44 patients (6.0%) died during follow-up, 19 deaths were cardiac-related which is consistent with a meta-analysis of EMPIRIC, MADIT-RIT, ADVANCE III, and PROVIDE. Serious device and procedure-related adverse effects occurred in 9.8% of patients.

Conclusions

In ICD/CRT-D devices with advanced SVT discriminators, device programming according to clinical setting and detection chamber significantly reduces the rate of inappropriate ICD shocks without compromising patient safety. The algorithms and settings described herein have particular clinical importance and their employment may be of benefit to ICD recipients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Rees JB, Borleffs CJ, de Bie MK, et al. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:556–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulz SM, Massa C, Grzbiela A, Dengler W, Wiedemann G, Pauli P. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks are prospective predictors of anxiety. Heart Lung. 2013;42:105–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Turakhia MP, Zweibel S, Swain AL, Mollenkopf SA, Reynolds MR. Healthcare utilization and expenditures associated with appropriate and inappropriate implantable defibrillator shocks. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.115.002210.

  4. Kulkarni N, Link MS. Causes and prevention of inappropriate implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018;10:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccep.2017.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruggemann T, Dahlke D, Chebbo A, Neumann I. Tachycardia detection in modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2016;27:171–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-016-0449-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwab JO, Bonnemeier H, Kleemann T, Brachmann J, Fischer S, Birkenhauer F, et al. Reduction of inappropriate ICD therapies in patients with primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: DECREASE study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015;104:1021–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0870-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwab JO, Bollinger C, Verltmann C, et al. First results of the ATPonFastVT-study. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:P06–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kolb C, Solzbach U, Biermann J, Semmler V, Kloppe A, Klein N, et al. Safety of mid-septal electrode placement in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients--results of the SPICE (Septal positioning of ventricular ICD electrodes) study. Int J Cardiol. 2014;174:713–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Priori SG, Wilde AA, Horie M, Cho Y, Behr ER, Berul C, et al. Executive summary: HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:e85–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac deathThe task force for the Management of Patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Europace. 2015;17:1601–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saxon LA, Hayes DL, Gilliam FR, Heidenreich PA, Day J, Seth M, et al. Long-term outcome after ICD and CRT implantation and influence of remote device follow-up: the ALTITUDE survival study. Circulation. 2010;122:2359–67. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.960633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorian P. Counterpoint: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias do not increase mortality. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:988–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.11.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wathen MS, DeGroot PJ, Sweeney MO, Stark AJ, Otterness MF, Adkisson WO, et al. Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: pacing fast ventricular tachycardia reduces shock therapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial results. Circulation. 2004;110:2591–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000145610.64014.E4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gasparini M, Proclemer A, Klersy C, Kloppe A, Lunati M, Ferrer JBM, et al. Effect of long-detection interval vs standard-detection interval for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on antitachycardia pacing and shock delivery: the ADVANCE III randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2013;309:1903–11. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.4598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kutyifa V, Daubert JP, Schuger C, Goldenberg I, Klein H, Aktas MK, et al. Novel ICD programming and inappropriate ICD therapy in CRT-D versus ICD patients: a MADIT-RIT sub-study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e001965. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.114.001965.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clementy N, Pierre B, Lallemand B, Marie O, Lemoine E, Cosnay P, et al. Long-term follow-up on high-rate cut-off programming for implantable cardioverter defibrillators in primary prevention patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Europace. 2012;14:968–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clementy N, Challal F, Marijon E, Boveda S, Defaye P, Leclercq C, et al. Very high rate programming in primary prevention patients with reduced ejection fraction implanted with a defibrillator: results from a large multicenter controlled study. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:211–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.10.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beau S, Greer S, Ellis CR, Keeney J, Asopa S, Arnold E, et al. Performance of an ICD algorithm to detect lead noise and reduce inappropriate shocks. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;45:225–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0081-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Daubert JP, Zareba W, Cannom DS, McNitt S, Rosero SZ, Wang P, et al. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1357–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Auricchio A, Schloss EJ, Kurita T, Meijer A, Gerritse B, Zweibel S, et al. Low inappropriate shock rates in patients with single- and dual/triple-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using a novel suite of detection algorithms: PainFree SST trial primary results. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:926–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, Brown MW, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, et al. Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2275–83. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkoff BL, Ousdigian KT, Sterns LD, Wang ZJ, Wilson RD, Morgan JM, et al. A comparison of empiric to physician-tailored programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the prospective randomized multicenter EMPIRIC trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:330–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilkoff BL, Williamson BD, Stern RS, Moore SL, Lu F, Lee SW, et al. Strategic programming of detection and therapy parameters in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduces shocks in primary prevention patients: results from the PREPARE (primary prevention parameters evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:541–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Olde Nordkamp LR, Brouwer TF, Barr C, et al. Inappropriate shocks in the subcutaneous ICD: incidence, predictors and management. Int J Cardiol. 2015;195:126–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.05.135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saeed M, Hanna I, Robotis D, et al. Programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with primary prevention indication to prolong time to first shock: results from the PROVIDE study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:52–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan VH, Wilton SB, Kuriachan V, Sumner GL, Exner DV. Impact of programming strategies aimed at reducing nonessential implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:164–70. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.113.001217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ezzat VA, Lee V, Ahsan S, et al. A systematic review of ICD complications in randomised controlled trials versus registries: is our ‘real-world’ data an underestimation? Open Heart. 2015;2. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000198.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to Rita Omega Ella and Lixian Sun (Abbott) for providing statistical supervision and to Helen Sims (IPPMed, Cloppenburg, Germany) for their editorial support.

Investigators

Germany: Armin Wöhrle (Esslingen); Thomas Kleemann (Ludwigshafen); Christian Veltmann (Hannover); Stefan Asbach (Freiburg); Marcus Siry (Memmingen); Matthias Oehler (Bad Langensalza); Hansmartin Jetter (Bad Mergentheim); Marc Kollum (Singen); Johannes Brachmann (Coburg); Frank Eberhardt (Köln); Hans-Heinrich Minden (Hennigsdorf); Johann Christoph Geller (Bad Berka); Karlheinz Seidl (Ingolstadt); Mathias Busch (Greifswald); Frederik Voss (Trier); Torsten Beck (Kirchheim); Holger Sigusch (Zwickau); Philipp Kahlert (Essen); Carsten Zobel (Euskirchen); Wilfried Dänschel (Chemnitz); Rüdiger Dißmann (Bremerhaven); Alexander Hansen (Eichstätt); Bettina Götting (Quakenbrück); Helge Simon (Kronach); Christian Perings (Lünen); Martin Arnold (Erlangen); Joachim Schümmelfeder (Eisenach); Albrecht Elsässer (Oldenburg); Christoph Klein (Berlin); Jochen Michaelsen (Lingen); Krum Petrov (Sindelfingen); Ludwig Binner (Ulm); Jenny Gärtner (Leisnig); Lars Eckardt (Münster); Hans-Holger Ebert (Riesa); Alexander Vaisbord (Schönebeck); Ramiz Emini (Ulm); Claudius Hansen (Göttingen); Michael Markant (Marl); Heiko Stellmach (Chemnitz); Sabine-Susan Schulz (Holzminden); Andreas Götte (Paderborn); Christoph Axthelm (Pirna); Oliver Gastmann (Arnstadt); Simone Kimmel (Nürnberg); Heinrich Weglage (Osnabrück); Johannes Bernhardt (Annaberg-Buchholz); Johannes Sperzel (Bad Nauheim); Hendrik Bonnemeier (Kiel); Sven Fischer (Quedlinburg); Tammam Ali (Eilenburg); Stephan Willems (Hamburg); Marcus Wiemer (Minden); Edgar Zitron (Heidelberg); Jörg Otto Schwab (Bonn).

Estonia: Indrek Roose (Tartu); Jüri Voitk (Tallinn).

Funding

Abbott (formerly St. Jude Medical; Eschborn, Germany) funded the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

J. Christoph Geller and Peter Bramlage outlined the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors gave their final approval for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johann Christoph Geller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Johann Christoph Geller is a consultant for Abbott and other device companies; Frank Birkenhauer is an employee of Abbott; Peter Bramlage is a consultant for Abbott and has received honoraria for the first draft of the manuscript; Christian Veltmann is a consultant for Medtronic, Biotronik and Boston Scientific, is on the speaker’s bureau of Medtronic, Biotronik, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Boehringer, and has received research grant from Abbott and Medtronic; Mathias Busch, Armin Wöhrle, Albrecht Elsässer, and Thomas Kleemann have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geller, J.C., Wöhrle, A., Busch, M. et al. Reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies using enhanced supraventricular tachycardia discriminators: the ReduceIT study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 61, 339–348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00816-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00816-9

Keywords

Navigation