Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unidimensionality and Measurement Invariance of the 11-Item Korean CES-D Scale among Examining Parents of Individuals with Cerebral Palsy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Parents of children with disabilities are more likely to experience depressive symptoms and other issues associated with poor mental health than parents of children without disabilities. A lack of measurement invariance in a depression scale could produce inconsistencies in study results and limit the generalizability of findings. The present study aimed to investigate the unidimensionality of the 11-item Korean version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D-11) and confirm its measurement invariance among parents of individuals with cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods

Data were collected from the 2012 Korea Welfare Panel Study and from research examining support services and policies for people with brain lesions. Comparative fit index values were compared to verify the fit of the measurement invariance models.

Results

The unidimensionality of the CES-D-11 was supported based on principal component analysis, the factor loadings of each item, and fit index (NFI = 0.932, TLI = 0.967; CFI = 0.981, RMSEA = 0.048). The invariance analysis confirmed configural invariance, metric invariance, scalar invariance, and uniqueness invariance. Internal consistency reliabilities were acceptable.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that the CES-D-11 is unidimensional, and that comparisons can be made between the general population and parents of individuals with CP. Additionally, this study supplements prior literature on invariance and strengthens the validity of the CES-D-11 as a useful screening tool, particularly for comparing measurements across groups to establish measurement invariance for outcome measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antunes, N., Vieira-Santos, S., Ribeiro, M.T., & Roberto, M.S. (2019). Portuguese version of the partner support for father involvement scale: Preliminary validation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01342-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azman, A., Jamir Singh, P. S., & Sulaiman, J. (2017). Caregiver coping with the mentally ill: a qualitative study. Journal of Mental Health, 26(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2015.1124395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhang, S. Y., Ha, E., Park, H., Ha, M., Hong, Y. C., Kim, B. N., & Jeong, K. S. (2016). Maternal stress and depressive symptoms and infant development at six months: the mothers and children’s environmental health (MOCEH) prospective study. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31, 843–851. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.843.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Billiet, J. (2002). Cross-cultural equivalence with structural equation modeling. In P. P. Mohler (ed.), Cross-Cultural Survey Methods (pp. 247–264). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björgvinsson, T., Kertz, S. J., Bigda-Peyton, J. S., McCoy, K. L., & Aderka, I. M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the CES-D-10 in a psychiatric sample. Assessment, 20, 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113481998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Britner, P. A., Morog, M. C., Pianta, R. C., & Marvin, R. S. (2003). Stress and coping: a comparison of self-report measures of functioning in families of young children with cerebral palsy or no medical diagnosis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12, 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. NY: The Gilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carona, C., Pereira, M., Moreira, H., Silva, N., & Canavarro, M. C. (2013). The disability paradox revisited: quality of life and family caregiving in pediatric cerebral palsy. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(7), 971–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, C. A., & Kaiser, H. F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182544750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramm, J. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2011). Psychological well-being of caregivers of children with intellectual disabilities: Using parental stress as a mediating factor. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 15(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629511410922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, C. A., Senatore, N., & Strachan, J. (2012). Fathers of children with disabilities: stress and life satisfaction. Stress and Health, 28(4), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, D. M. (2006). Comparing groups on latent variables: a structural equation modeling approach. Work, 26, 429–436.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, W., & Kessler, L. G. (1981). Rates of symptoms of depression in a national sample. American Journal of Epidemiology, 114, 528–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faravelli, C., Scarpato, M. A., Castellini, G., & Sauro, C. L. (2013). Gender differences in depression and anxiety: the role of age. Psychiatry Research, 210(3), 1301–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.09.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro, M. A., & Speechley, K. N. (2013). Factor structure and longitudinal invariance of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in adult women: application in a population-based sample of mothers of children with epilepsy. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 16, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-013-0331-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. F., & West, S. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 439–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellis, Z. D. (2010). Assessment of a brief CES-D measure for depression in homebound medically ill older adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 53, 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634371003741417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 11.0 update. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, P., Nuñez, A., Merz, E., Brintz, C., Weitzman, O., Navas, E. L., & Perreira, K. (2017). Measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (ces-d 10): Findings from Hchs/sol. Psychological Assessment, 29(4), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. H., Rouse, M. H., Connell, A. M., Broth, M. R., Hall, C. M., & Heyward, D. (2011). Maternal depression and child psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-010-0080-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th edn. NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hann, D., Winter, K., & Jacobsen, P. (1999). Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 46(5), 437–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harry, M. L., & Crea, T. M. (2018). Examining the measurement invariance of a modified CES-D for American Indian and non-Hispanic White adolescents and young adults. Psychological Assessment, 30(8), 1107–1120. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoe, M. S., Park, B. S., & Bae, S. W. (2015). Testing measurement invariance of the 11-item Korean version CES-D scale. Mental Health and Social Work, 43, 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, V., Makine, C., Karşıdağ, Ç., Kadıoğlu., P., & Pouwer, F. (2011). Validation of the Turkish version of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Long-Foley, K., Reed, P. S., Mutran, E. J., & Devellis, R. F. (2002). Measurement adequacy of the CES-D among a sample of older African Americans. Psychiatry Research, 109, 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, M. (2011). Understanding pain in patients with intellectual disabilities. American Nurse Today, 6, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohebbi, M., Nguyen, V., McNeil, J. J., Woods, R. L., Nelson, M. R., Shah, R. C., & Wolfe, R. (2018). Psychometric properties of a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D-10) scale for screening depressive symptoms in healthy community dwelling older adults. General Hospital Psychiatry, 51, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, S. J., & Park, E. Y. (2017). Relationship between caregiving burden and depression in caregivers of individuals with intellectual disabilities in Korea. Journal of Mental Health, 26, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2016.1276538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nazim, A., & Ahmad, S. (2013). Assessing the unidimensionality, reliability, validity and fitness of influential factors of 8th grade student’s mathematics achievement in Malaysia. International Journal of Advance Research, 1(2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. T., Kitner-Triolo, M., Evans, M. K., & Zonderman, A. B. (2004). Factorial invariance of the CES-D in low socioeconomic status African Americans compared with a nationally representative sample. Psychiatry Research, 126, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2004.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, K., Yilmaz, E., Cetinkaya, B., & Caglar, N. (2005). Assessment of the quality of life of mothers of children with cerebral palsy (primary caregivers). Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 19(3), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968305278857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osada, H., Coelho de Amorim, A., Velosa A Wan, W. P., Lotrakul, P., & Hara, H. (2013). Depression risks in mothers of children with developmental disabilities: a cross-cultural comparison of Brazil, Colombia, Malaysia and Thailand. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 59, 398–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764012438477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, E.Y., & Nam, S.J. (2018). Time burden of caring and depression among parents of individuals with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1432705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. C., Park, E. Y., Park, S. Y., & Noh, S. H. (2015). Service delivery status and policy support directions for people with brain lesions. Asan: Ministry of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreira, K. M., Deeeb-Sossa, N., Harris, K. M., & Bokeen, K. (2005). What are we measuring? An evaluation of the CES-D across race/ethnicity and immigrant generation. Social Forces, 83, 1567–1602. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilowsky, D. J., Wickramaratne, P., Nomura, Y., & Weissman, M. M. (2006). Family discord, parental depression, and psychopathology in offspring: 20-year follow-up. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000198592.23078.8d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozario, P. A., & Menon, N. (2010). An examination of the measurement adequacy of the CES-D among African American women family caregivers. Psychiatry Research., 179(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.06.022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schantz, K., Reighard, C., Aikens, J. E., Aruquipa, A., Pinto, B., Valverde, H., & Piette, J. D. (2017). Screening for depression in Andean Latin America: factor structure and reliability of the CES-D short form and the PHQ-8 among Bolivian public hospital patients. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 52, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091217417738934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, A. B. (2006). Meta-analysis of the factor structures of four depression questionnaires: Beck, CES-D, Hamilton, and Zung. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(1), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, G. H. (2006). Meta-analysis of comparative studies of depression in mothers of children with and without developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111(3), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[155:MOCSOD]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum-Gori, S. L., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Assessing the unidimensionality of psychological scales: using multiple criteria from factor analysis. Social Indicators Research, 102(3), 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality & Quantity, 43(4), 599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, J. W 2005). Fathers of children with educational disabilities: the role of stress in life satisfaction. FL: Florida State University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stremler, R., Haddad, S., Pullenayegum, E., & Parshuram, C. (2017). Psychological outcomes in parents of critically ill hospitalized children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 34, 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zauszniewski, J. A., & Graham, G. C. (2009). Comparison of short scales to measure depressive symptoms in elders with diabetes. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 31, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945908326065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Fokkema, M., Cuijpers, P., Li, J., Smits, N., & Beekman, A. (2011). Measurement invariance of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D) among Chinese and Dutch elderly. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 74 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

J.K. contributed to conception and design of the study, data collection, conducted the statistical analysis, and interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript. E.P. contributed to conduct the statistical analysis, interpretation of the data and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung-Hee Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, EY., Kim, JH. Unidimensionality and Measurement Invariance of the 11-Item Korean CES-D Scale among Examining Parents of Individuals with Cerebral Palsy. J Child Fam Stud 29, 895–903 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01630-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01630-2

Keywords

Navigation