Skip to main content
Log in

New Spectrophotometric Assay of Pyrantel Pamoate in Pharmaceuticals and Spiked Human Urine Using Three Complexing Agents

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Spectroscopy Aims and scope

Three simple, rapid, inexpensive, and highly sensitive spectrophotometric methods are described for the quantifi cation of pyrantel pamoate (PYP) in pure drug and formulations. The methods are based on the molecular charge-transfer (CT) complexation reaction involving pyrantel base (PYL) as n-donor and iodine as σ-acceptor (I 2 , method A), and 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP, method B) or picric acid (PA, method C) as π-acceptors. Spectrophotometrically, the CT complexes showed absorption maxima at 380, 420, and 430 nm, for methods A, B, and C, respectively. Under optimum conditions, Beer's law was obeyed over the concentration ranges 0.12–2.9, 0.12–3.75, and 0.12–2.9 μg/ml for methods A, B, and C, respectively. The apparent molar absorptivity of the CT complexes at the respective λmax are calculated to be 2.63 × 10 5 , 6.91 × 10 4 , and 1.73 × 10 5 l/mol·cm respectively and the corresponding Sandell sensitivity values are 0.0009, 0.003, and 0.0012. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) are calculated to be (0.02 and 0.07), (0.05 and 0.15), and (0.02 and 0.07) μg/ml with methods A, B, and C, respectively. The intra-day and inter-day accuracy expressed as %RE and precision expressed as %RSD are less than 3%. The methods have been applied to the determination of PYP in tablets, suspensions, and spiked human urine. Parallel assay by a reference method and statistical analysis of the results obtained show no significant difference between the proposed methods and the reference method with respect to accuracy and precision, as evident from the Student’s t and variation ratio tests. The accuracy of the methods has been further ascertained by recovery tests via the standard addition technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. L. Olivares, R. Fernandez, J. Heta, G. Rodrignez, and A. Clavel, Dig. Dis., 21, 258–261 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Bjorn, D. R. Hennessy, and C. Fris, Int. J. Parasitol., 26, 1375–1380 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Hadju, L. S. Stepenson, K. Abadi, H. O. Mohammed, D. D. Bowmann, and R. S. Parker, Parasitol., 113, 497–504 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. J. Rim and J. K. Lim, Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 66, 170–175 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. J. Rim and J. K. Lim, Asian. J. Med., 9, 393–399 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The United States Pharmacopoeia, The National Formularly, USP 24. NF 19, USP Convention Inc. 12601, Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, MD (2005) 1678.

  7. E. G. Oltean, Med. Vet/Vet. Drug., 5, 64–67 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. J. Allender, Oxford J., 26, 470–472 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Lucie, B. Ivana, S. Dalibor, M. Ludmila, L. Alena, O. Zdenek, and S. Petr, Anal. Methods, 4, 1592–1597 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Zhiyuan, X. Yan, and H. Ying, Lei Huaxi Yaoxue Zazhi, 19, 462–463 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Raman and V. M. Shinde, Indian Drugs, 36, 167–172 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. P. Argekar, S. V. Raj, and S. U. Kapadia, Talanta, 44, 1959–1965 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. U. P. Halkar, S. H. Rane, and N. P. Bhandari, Indian Drugs, 34, 194–196 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. J. Allender, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 26, 470–472 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. J. Konrardy, A. M. Burner, T. W. Garner, A. M. Litchman, and K. G. Webster, J. AOAC Int., 86, 882–887 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Anon, Indian Drugs, 35, 49–51 (1998).

  17. S. S. Zarapkar, S. S. Kolte, and S. H. Rane, Indian Drugs, 34, 707–709 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. F. George, F. M. Robert, and L. W. Richard, J. Pharm. Sci., 60, 111–113 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. S. Langade, R. M. Charde, M. S. Charde, and M. R. Tajne, J. Pharm. Sci., 3, 212–215 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. B. N. Prasad, A. C. S. Rao, S. C. Mathur, Y. Kumar, and S. K. Talwar, Indian Drugs, 36, 403–407 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Hancu and A. Gyeresi, Farmacia (Bucharest), 47, 11–19 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. I. H. Refaat, M. E. El-Kommos, H. H. Farag, and N. A. El-Rabat, Bull. Pharm. Sci., 10, 85–102 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Rajeev, J. Nimisha, and K. Radhapyari, Talanta, 70, 383–386 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. V. K. Gupta, R. Jain, N. Jadon, and K. Radhapyari, J. Coll. Int. Sci., 350, 330–335 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D. C. Tiwari, R. Jain, and G. Sahu, J. Ind. Chem. Soc., 10, 1047–1050 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Aubeck and N. Hampp, Anal. Chim. Acta, 256, 257–262 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Basavaiah and H. C. Prameela, Chem. Anal. (Warsaw), 48, 327–334 (2003).

  28. C. S. R. Lakshmi and M. N. Reddy, Ind. J. Pharm. Sci., 60, 302–304 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. M. Shingbal and V. R. Rao, Indian Drugs, 25, 22–24 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. S. R. Lakshmi and M. N. Reddy, East. Pharm., 41, 127–128 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  31. O. O. Johnson and U. Ajima, Int. Drug Dev. Res., 3, 199–204 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. K. N. Prashanth and K. Basavaiah, Acta Pol. Pharm. Drug Res., 69, 213–223 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  33. T. Karuna, K. Neelima, G. Venkateshwarulu, and P. Yadagiriswamy, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 65, 808–811 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. A. M. Abdulrahman and K. Basavaiah, Int. J. Anal. Chem., 1–9 (2011) ID 619310.

  35. International Conference on Hormonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R 1), Complementary Guideline on Methodology, 6 November 1996, London (2005).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Basavaiah.

Additional information

Abstract of article is published in Zhurnal Prikladnoi Spektroskopii, Vol. 82, No. 3, p. 479, May–June, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swamy, N., Prashanth, K.N. & Basavaiah, K. New Spectrophotometric Assay of Pyrantel Pamoate in Pharmaceuticals and Spiked Human Urine Using Three Complexing Agents. J Appl Spectrosc 82, 502–512 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-015-0138-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-015-0138-4

Keywords

Navigation