Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation with and without subconjunctival bevacizumab in refractory glaucoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection on intraocular pressure (IOP), hypertensive phase, and failure and success rates of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation.

Methods

A total of 63 eyes of 63 patients (30 cases in control and 33 cases in bevacizumab group) were included in this randomized masked prospective clinical trial. Pre- and postoperative BCVA, IOP, number of medications, complications and success rates were compared between

AGV + bevacizumab and AGV alone group.

Results

Both groups showed statistically significant reductions in IOP in all their follow-up visits (P < 0.05). The mean IOP was lower in the AGV + Bevacizumab group than AGV group in all follow-up visits. However, the difference was only significant at the 3rd month (17.3 ± 6.2 vs. 20.7 ± 4.6, p = 0.04). The number of medications was not differed significantly between the two groups at their last visit (p value = 0.84) Complete success rate was higher in AGV + Bevacizumab. However, the difference was not significant (p = 0.73). The qualified and overall success rate, failure rate and the need for second tube were not statistically different between the two groups. The hypertensive phase was not statistically significant between the 2 groups (33.3% in AGV + Bevacizumab group and 50% in AGV group, p = 0.06)

Conclusion

Adjunctive use of Bevacizumab during AGV implantation is beneficial in controlling hypertensive phase and IOP control and may lead to higher success rates and lower failure rates after AGV implantation. However, whether it’s clearly beneficial or its exact role remains to be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tailor R, Kinsella MT, Clarke JC (2018) Long-term outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab followed by ahmed valve implantation in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Semin ophthalmol 33:606–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Assaad MH, Baerveldt G, Rockwood EJ (1999) Glaucoma drainage devices: pros and cons. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 10:147–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR et al (1995) Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 120:23–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eid TE, Katz LJ, Spaeth GL et al (1997) Tube-shunt surgery versus neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology 104:1692–1700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Katz LJ, Spaeth GL (1987) Surgical management of the secondary glaucomas: part I. Ophthalmic Surg 18:826–834

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yazdani S, Mahboobipour H, Pakravan M et al (2016) Adjunctive mitomycin C or amniotic membrane transplantation for Ahmed Glaucoma valve implantation: a randomized clinical trial. J Glaucoma 25:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fargione RA, Tansuebchueasai N, Lee R et al (2019) Etiology and management of the hypertensive phase in glaucoma drainage-device surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 64:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jang HJ, Kim BJ, Kim JH et al (2017) The addition of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. Oncotarget 8(42):73009–73016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arcieri ES, Paula JS, Jorge R et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab in eyes with neovascular glaucoma undergoing Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: 2-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol 93:e1-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang JY, Nam KY, Lee SJ et al (2014) The effect of intravitreal bevacizumab injection before Ahmed valve implantation in patients with neovascular glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 34:793–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwon J, Sung KR (2017) Effect of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab on the surgical outcome of neovascular glaucoma at different stages. J Ophthalmol 2017:7672485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olmos LC, Sayed MS, Moraczewski AL et al (2016) Long-term outcomes of neovascular glaucoma treated with and without intravitreal bevacizumab. Eye 30:463–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sahyoun M, Azar G, Khoueir Z et al (2015) Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve in association with intravitreal bevacizumab in neovascular glaucoma. J Glaucoma 24:383–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou M, Xu X, Zhang X et al (2016) Clinical outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma valve implantation with or without intravitreal bevacizumab pretreatment for neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glaucoma 25(7):551–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coote MA, Ruddle JB, Qin Q et al (2008) Vascular changes after intra-bleb injection of bevacizumab. J glaucoma 17(7):517–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grewal DS, Jain R, Kumar H, Grewal SP (2008) Evaluation of subconjunctival bevacizumab as an adjunct to trabeculectomy a pilot study. Ophthalmology 115(12):2141–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sengupta S, Venkatesh R, Ravindran RD (2012) Safety and efficacy of using off-label bevacizumab versus mitomycin C to prevent bleb failure in a single-site phacotrabeculectomy by a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Glaucoma 21(7):450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miraftabi A, Nilforushan N, Darghahi M et al (2018) Effect of subconjunctival Bevacizumab injection on the outcome of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: a randomized control trial. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 46:750–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldenfeld M, Krupin T, Ruderman JM et al (1994) 5-Fluorouracil in initial trabeculectomy. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Ophthalmology 101:1024–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Khaw PT, Sherwood MB, MacKay SL et al (1992) Five-minute treatments with fluorouracil, floxuridine, and mitomycin have long-term effects on human Tenon’s capsule fibroblasts. Arch ophthalmol 110:1150–1154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilkins M, Indar A, Wormald R (2005) Intra-operative mitomycin C for glaucoma surgery. Cochrane Database syst Rev 2005(4):Cd002897. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002897.pub21

  22. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J (2003) Evaluation of the hypertensive phase after insertion of the Ahmed Glaucoma valve. Am J Ophthalmol 136:1001–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Freedman J, Iserovich P (2013) Pro-inflammatory cytokines in glaucomatous aqueous and encysted Molteno implant blebs and their relationship to pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:4851–4855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Davidorf FH, Mouser JG, Derick RJ (2006) Rapid improvement of rubeosis iridis from a single bevacizumab (Avastin) injection. Retina 26:354–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kahook MY, Schuman JS, Noecker RJ (2006) Needle bleb revision of encapsulated filtering bleb with bevacizumab. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Off J Int Soc Imaging Eye 37:148–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenfeld PJ, Fung AE, Puliafito CA (2005) Optical coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin) for macular edema from central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Off J Int Soc Imaging Eye 36:336–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim TI, Chung JL, Hong JP et al (2009) Bevacizumab application delays epithelial healing in rabbit cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:4653–4659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mahdy RA (2011) Adjunctive use of bevacizumab versus mitomycin C with Ahmed valve implantation in treatment of pediatric glaucoma. J Glaucoma 20:458–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rojo-Arnao M, Albis-Donado OD, Lliteras-Cardin M et al (2011) Adjunctive bevacizumab in patients undergoing Ahmed valve implantation: a pilot study. Ophthalmic Surg lasers Imaging Off J Int Soc Imaging Eye 42:132–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cui QN, Hsia YC, Lin SC et al (2017) Effect of mitomycin c and 5-flurouracil adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 45:128–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li XJ, Filek R, He XG et al (2018) Risk factors for flat anterior chamber after glaucoma filtration surgery. Int J Ophthalmol 11(8):1322–1329

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mona Safizadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Availability of material

The raw data are available at Farabi Eye Research Center.

Ethics approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (No: IR.TUMS.REC.1395.2843). The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarei, R., Ghasempour, M., Fakhraie, G. et al. Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation with and without subconjunctival bevacizumab in refractory glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 41, 1593–1603 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01691-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01691-7

Keywords

Navigation