Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Between Social and Biological Heredity: Cope and Baldwin on Evolution, Inheritance, and Mind

  • Historiographic Essay
  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the years of the post-Darwinian debate, many American naturalists invoked the name of Lamarck to signal their belief in a purposive and anti-Darwinian view of evolution. Yet Weismann’s theory of germ-plasm continuity undermined the shared tenet of the neo-Lamarckian theories as well as the idea of the interchangeability between biological and social heredity. Edward Drinker Cope, the leader of the so-called “American School,” defended his neo-Lamarckian philosophy against every attempt to redefine the relationship between behavior, development, and heredity beyond the epigenetic model of inheritance. This paper explores Cope’s late-career defense of neo-Lamarckism. Particular attention is dedicated to the debate he had with James Mark Baldwin before the publication of Baldwin’s own “A New Factor in Evolution” (1896d). I argue that Cope’s criticism was partly due to the fact that Baldwin’s theory of social heredity threatened Cope’s biologistic stance, as well as his attempt to preserve design in nature. This theoretical attitude had a remarkable impact on Baldwin’s arguments for the theory of organic selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Archival Sources

  • Edward Drinker Cope Papers (MC 956), Quaker & Special Collections, Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USA. Miscellaneous letters, referred to in-text as HCQC.

Published Sources

  • Baertschi, Bernard. 2005. “Diderot, Cabanis and Lamarck on Psycho-Physical Causality.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27(3/4): 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1895a. Mental Development in the Child and the Race: Methods and Processes. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1895b. “Consciousness and Evolution.” Science 2(34): 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1895c. “Professor Baldwin on ‘Mental Development’.” The American Naturalist 29(345): 873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1896a. “Consciousness and Evolution.” The American Naturalist 30(351): 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1896b. “Heredity and Instinct.” Science 3(64): 438–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1896c. “Physical and Social Heredity.” The American Naturalist 30(353): 422–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1896d. “A New Factor in Evolution.” The American Naturalist 30(354): 441–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1896e. “A New Factor in Evolution (continued).” The American Naturalist 30(355): 536–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1897. “Organic Selection.” Nature 55: 558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James Mark. 1902. Development and Evolution. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, Robert C. 1979. Science and Myth in Anglo-American Social Thought. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsanti, Giulio. 1979. Dalla storia naturale alla storia della natura. Milan: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsanti, Giulio. 2005. Una lunga pazienza cieca. Storia dell’evoluzionismo. Turin: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boller, Paul F. 1969. American Thought in Transition: The Impact of Evolutionary Naturalism, 1859–1900. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1977. “Edward Drinker Cope and the Changing Structure of Evolutionary Theory.” Isis 68(2): 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1983. The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades Around 1900. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1985. “Scientific Attitudes to Darwinism in Britain and America.” David Kohn (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 641–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1989. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 2017. “Alternatives to Darwinism in the Early Twentieth Century.” Richard G. Deslile (ed.), The Darwinian Tradition in Context: Research Programs in Evolutionary Biology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, Richard W. 1977. The Spirit of the System: Lamarck and Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, Richard W. 1979. “Closing the Door on Lord Morton’s Mare: The Rise and Fall of Telegony.” Studies in the History of Biology 3: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, Richard W. 2013. “Lamarck, Evolution, and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Genetics 194(4): 793–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Samuel. 1880. Unconscious Memory: A Comparison of the Theory of Dr. Ewald Hering and the “Philosophy of the Unconscious” of Dr. Edward von Hartmann. London: David Bogue.

  • Churchill, Frederick B. 1968. “August Weismann and a Break from Tradition.” Journal of the History of Biology 1: 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Frederick B. 1978. “The Weismann-Spencer Controversy over the Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Proceeding of the 15th International Congress of the History of Science: 451–468.

  • Churchill, Frederick B. 2015. August Weismann: Development, Heredity, and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Clevenger, Shobal V. 1887. “The Cope-Montgomery Controversy.” The Open Court 1(14): 389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerell, Theodore Dru Alison. 1920. “Biographical Memoir of Alpheus Spring Packard.” Biographical Memoirs, National Academy of Sciences 9: 179–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Continenza, Barbara. 1984. “Tra lamarckismo e darwinismo: l’effetto Baldwin.” Vittorio Somenzi (ed.), Evoluzione e modelli: Il concetto di adattamento nelle teorie dei sistemi biologici, culturali e artificiali. Rome: Editori Riuniti, pp. 107–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Continenza, Barbara. 1986. “Simulation of Lamarckism or stimulation of Darwinism.” Rivista di Storia della Scienza 3(2): 155–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1871a. “The Laws of Organic Development.” The American Naturalist 5(8/9): 593–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1871b “The Method of Creation of Organic Forms..” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 12(86): 229–263.

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1875. Vertebrata of Cretaceous Formations of the West: Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories, 2 vols. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1877. “Comparative Anatomy.” Johnson’s Universal Cyclopædia 3: 869–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1880. “A Review of the Modern Doctrine of Evolution.” The American Naturalist 14(4): 260–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887a. The Origin of the Fittest. New York: D. Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887b. Theology of Evolution. Philadelphia: Arnold and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887c. “The Perissodactyla.” The American Naturalist 21(12): 1060–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887d. “Montgomery on the Theology of Evolution - Part II.” The Open Court 1(13): 358–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1887e. “The Relation of Mind To Matter.” The Open Court 1(19): 527–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1889a. “Ethical Evolution.[reprinted from The Open Court,” March 21, 1889]. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co.

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1889b. “On Inheritance in Evolution.” The American Naturalist 23(276): 1058–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1890. “Two Perils of the Indo-European - Part I.” The Open Court 3(126): 2052–2053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1895. “The Present Problems of Organic Evolution.” The Monist 5(4): 563–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1896a. The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1896b. “Prof. Mark Baldwin on Preformation and Epigenesis.” The American Naturalist 30(35): 342–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Edward Drinker. 1896c. “Observations on Prof. Baldwin’s Reply.” The American Naturalist 30(353): 428–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, Pietro. 1978. “The Importance of French Transformist Ideas for the Second Volume of Lyell’s Principles of Geology.” The British Journal for the History of Science 2(39): 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, Pietro. 1983. Oltre il mito: Lamarck e le scienze naturali del suo tempo. Bologna: il Mulino.

  • Corsi, Pietro. 1988. The Age of Lamarck: Evolutionary Theories in France 1790–1830. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, Pietro. 2011. “Jean-Baptiste Lamarck: From Myth to History.” Snait B. Gissis, Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, Pietro. 2012. “Idola Tribus: Lamarck, Politics and Religion in the Early Nineteenth Century.” Aldo Fasolo (ed.), The Theory of Evolution and its Impact. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, Pietro, Gayon, Jean, Gohau, Gabriel, Tirard, Stéphane (eds.). 2005. Lamarck, philosophe de la nature. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Jane Pierce. 1997. The Bone Sharp: The Life of Edward Drinker Cope. Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, David J. 2003. “Baldwin and His Many Effects.” Bruce H Weber, David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, G. 1821. “A Communication of a singular Fact in Natural History.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 111: 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke, Donald R. 2006. “Heredity as Transmission of Information: Butlerian Intelligent Design.” Centaurus 48: 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, Persifor. 1902. “Alphabetical Cross-Reference Catalogue of All the Publications of the Late Edward Drinker Cope.” Memorias y Revistas 1899–1900(2): 1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gissis, Snait B. 2011. “Introduction: Lamarckian Problematics in Historical Perspective.” Snait B. Gissis, Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gissis, Snait B., Jablonka, Eva (eds.). 2011. Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliboff, Sander. 2011. “The Golden Age of Lamarckism, 1866-1926.” Snait B. Gissis, Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1981. “The Rise of Neo-Lamarckism in America.” International Colloquium on Lamarck. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, pp. 81–91.

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, Theodore John. 1986. Variation, Heredity, and Scientific Explanation in the Evolutionary Theory of Four American Neo-Lamarckians, 1867–1897. Ph.D diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Griffiths, Paul E. 2003. “Beyond the Baldwin Effect: James Mark Baldwin’s ‘Social Heredity’, Epigenetic Inheritance, and Niche Construction.” Bruce H. Weber, David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Brian K. 2001. “Organic Selection: Proximate Environmental Effects on the Evolution of Morphology and Behaviour.” Biology and Philosophy 16(2): 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper, Kull, Kalevi. 2003. “Baldwin and Biosemiotics: What Intelligence is For.” Bruce H. Weber, David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, Richard. 1944. Social Darwinism in American Thought. Massachusetts: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, Alpheus. 1884. “Evolution of the Cephalopoda.” Science 3: 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, Alpheus. 1893a. “Bioplastology and the related Branches of Biological Research.” Proceedings of Boston Society of Natural History 26: 59–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, Alpheus. 1893b. “Phylogeny and Acquired Characteristics.” The American Naturalist 27(322): 865–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, Eva, Lamb, Marion J. 2014. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Curtis. 2015. Darwin’s Dice: The Idea of Chance in the Thought of Charles Darwin. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Largent, Mark. 2009. “The So-Called Eclipse of Darwinism.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 99(1): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Vergata, Antonello. 1995. “Il lamarckismo fra riduzionismo biologico e meliorismo sociale.” Lamarck e il Lamarckismo. Reggio Calabria: La Città del Sole, pp. 183–219.

  • Loison, Laurent. 2012. “The French Neo-Lamarckian Project (1880–1910).” Revue d’historie des sciences 65(1): 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, Edmund. 1887. “Cope’s Theology of Evolution - Part I.” The Open Court 1(6): 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, James Richard. 1979. The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant struggle to come to terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Conwy Lloyd. 1896. Habit and Instinct. London-New York: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, William Romaine. 1895. “Mental Development in the Child and the Race: Methods and Processes – review.” The American Naturalist 29(343): 687–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, William Romaine. 1896. “American Psychological Association.” The American Naturalist 30(350): 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numbers, Roland L. 1998. Darwinism Comes to America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1889. “The Paleontological Evidence for the Transmission of Acquired Characters.” The American Naturalist 23(271): 561–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1890 “The Paleontological Evidence for the Transmission of Acquired Characters.” Science 15(367): 110–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1891. “The Present Problem of Heredity.” The Atlantic Monthly 67(401): 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1895. “The Hereditary Mechanism and the Search for the Unknown Factors of Evolution.” The American Naturalist 29(341): 418–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1897a. “Organic Selection.” Science 6(146): 584–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1897b. “The Limits of Organic Selection.” The American Naturalist 31(371): 944–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1907. Evolution of Mammalian Molar Teeth to and from the Triangular Type. New York: Macmillan and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1931. Cope: Master Naturalist. Life and Letters of Edward Drinker Cope, with a Bibliography of his Writings classified by Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1934. “Aristogenesis, the Creative Principle in the Origin of Species.” The American Naturalist 68(716): 193–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, Alpheus. 1876. “A Century’s Progress in American Zoology.” The American Naturalist 10(10): 592–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, Alpheus. 1885. “Introduction.” John Sterling Kingsley (ed.), The Standard Natural History, 1 vol. Boston: S.E. Cassino and Company, pp. I–LXXI.

  • Packard, Alpheus. 1901. Lamarck, the Founder of Evolution. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, Edward J. 1965. “The Genesis of American Neo-Lamarckism.” Isis 56(2): 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, Edward J. 1988. “United States.” Thomas F Glick (ed.), The Comparative Reception of Darwinism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 168–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, Massimo, Müller, Gerd B (eds.). 2010. Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Robert J. 1987. Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, Jacques, (ed.). 1979. “Les Néo-lamarckiens français.” Revue de Synthèse 3 (95/96): 279–469

  • Romanes, Georges John. 1888. “Lamarckism versus Darwinism.” Nature 38: 413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, Georges John. 1893. An Examination of Weismannism. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, Georges John. 1895. Darwin, and After Darwin: An Exposition of the Darwinian Theory and a Discussion of Post-Darwinian Questions, 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, George Gaylord. 1953. “The Baldwin Effect.” Evolution 7(2): 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. (1855) 1890. The Principles of Psychology1 vol. London–Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1893a. “The Inadequacy of ‘Natural Selection’.” Contemporary Review 63(153–166): 439–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1893b. “Professor Weismann Theories.” Contemporary Review 63: 743–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1893c. “A Rejoinder to Professor Weismann.” Contemporary Review 64: 893–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1894. “Weismannism once more.” Contemporary Review 66: 592–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1895. “Heredity once more.” Contemporary Review 68: 608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, George W. 1962. “Lamarckianism in American Social Science: 1890-1915.” Journal of the History of Ideas 23(2): 239–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, George W. 1968. Race, Culture, and Evolution. Essays in the History of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turbil, Cristiano. 2017. “Making Heredity Matter: Samuel Butler’s Idea of Unconscious Memory.” Journal of the History of Biology 51(1): 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-017-9469-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1889. Darwinism: An Exposition of the Theory of Natural Selection. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Lester Frank. 1891. “Neo-Darwinism and Neo-Lamarckism.” Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 6: 11–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Bruce H., Depew, David J. (eds.). 2003. Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann, August. 1891. In Edward B. Poulton, Selmar Schönland, and Arthur E. Shipley (eds.), Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems, 1 vol. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Weissman, Charlotte. 2011. “Germinal Selection: A Weismannian Solution to Lamarckian Problematics.” Snait B Gissis, Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. David Ceccarelli

    Present address: , Rome, Italy

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History, Humanities and Society, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Columbia 1, 00133, Rome, Italy

    David Ceccarelli

Authors
  1. David Ceccarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ceccarelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ceccarelli, D. Between Social and Biological Heredity: Cope and Baldwin on Evolution, Inheritance, and Mind. J Hist Biol 52, 161–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9522-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9522-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation