Abstract
This is the first of a two-part essay on the history of debates concerning the creativity of natural selection, from Darwin through the evolutionary synthesis and up to the present. Here I focus on the mid-late nineteenth century to the early twentieth, with special emphasis on early Darwinism and its critics, the self-styled “mutationists.” The second part focuses on the evolutionary synthesis and some of its critics, especially the “neutralists” and “neo-mutationists.” Like Stephen Gould, I consider the creativity of natural selection to be a key component of what has traditionally counted as “Darwinism.” I argue that the creativity of natural selection is best understood in terms of (1) selection initiating evolutionary change, and (2) selection being responsible for the presence of the variation it acts upon, for example by directing the course of variation. I consider the respects in which both of these claims sound non-Darwinian, even though they have long been understood by supporters and critics alike to be virtually constitutive of Darwinism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, Garland E. 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Allen, Garland E. 1980. “The Evolutionary Synthesis: Morgan and Natural Selection Revisited.” Ernst Mayr, William B. Provine (eds), The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 356–382.
Beatty, John. 2010. “Chance and Design.” Michael Ruse (ed), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 146–151.
Beatty, John. 2014. “Darwin’s Cyclopean Architect.” R Paul Thompson, Denis Walsh (eds), Evolutionary Biology: Conceptual, Ethical and Religious Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beatty, John. Forthcoming. “The Creativity of Natural Selection? Part II: The Synthesis and Since.” Journal of the History of Biology.
Blyth, Edward. 1835. “An Attempt to Classify the ‘Varieties’ of Animals, with Observations on the Marked Seasonal and Other Changes Which Naturally Take Place in Various British Species, and Which Do Not Constitute Varieties.” Magazine of Natural History 3: 40–53.
Blyth, Edward. 1837. “On the Psychological Distinctions Between Man and Other Animals; and the Consequent Diversity of Human Influence Over the Inferior Ranks of Creations, from Any Mutual and Reciprocal Influence Exercised Among the Latter.” Magazine of Natural History 1(new series): 77–85.
Bowler, Peter J. 1979. “Theodor Eimer and Orthogenesis: Evolution by ‘Definitely Directed Variation’.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 34: 40–73.
Castle, William E. 1912. “The Inconstancy of Unit-Characters.” The American Naturalist 46: 352–362.
Castle, William E., Phillips, J.C. 1914. “Piebald Rats and Selection: An Experimental Test of the Effectiveness of Selection and of the Theory of Gametic Purity in Mendelian Crosses.” Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 195: 1–54.
Chetverikov, Sergei S. 1961. “On Certain Aspects of the Evolutionary Process from the Standpoint of Modern Genetics.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 105(2): 167–195.
Churchill, Frederick B. 2015. August Weismann: Development, Heredity, and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.
Darwin, Charles. 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. London: John Murray.
Darwin, Charles. 1869. On the Origin of Species by Means of of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 5th ed. London: Murray.
Darwin, Charles. 1993. The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, 1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, Charles. 2009. The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, 1869. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Vries, Hugo. 1906. Species and Varieties: Their Origin by Mutation, 2nd ed. Chicago: Open Court.
de Vries, Hugo. 1909–1910. Mutation Theory: Experiments and Observations on the Origin of Species in the Vegetable Kingdom. J.B. Farmer and A.D. Darbishire (Trans). Chicago: Open Court.
Eimer, G.H. Theodor. 1890. Organic Evolution as a Result of the Inheritance of Acquired Characters According to the Laws of Organic Growth (J.T. Cunningham, Trans). London: Macmillan.
Eisley, Loren. 1979. Darwin and the Mysterious Mr. X: New Light on the Evolutionists. New York: Dutton.
Futuyma, Douglas J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Gayon, Jean. 1998. Darwinism’s Struggle for Survival: Heredity and the Hypothesis of Natural Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. “Darwin’s untimely burial.” Ever Since (ed), Darwin: Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton, pp. 39–45.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1987. “Misserving Memory: A Review of Darwin and the Mysterious Mr X. by Loren Eisley.” Stephen Jay Gould (ed), An Urchin in the Storm: Essays About Books and Ideas. New York: Norton, pp. 51–59.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jenkin, Fleeming. 1867. “The Origin of Species.” North British Review 46: 277–318.
Lennox, James. 2010. “The Darwin/Gray Correspondence 1857–1869: An Intelligent Discussion About Chance and Design.” Perspectives on Science 18(4): 456–479.
Mayr, Ernst. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
Mayr, Ernst. 1970. Populations, Species, and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mayr, Ernst. 1980. “Prologue: Some Thoughts on the History of the Evolutionary Synthesis.” Ernst Mayr, William B Provine (eds), The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–48.
Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1909. “For Darwin.” Popular Science Monthly 74: 367–380.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1925. Evolution and Genetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1935. The Scientific Basis of Evolution, 2nd ed. New York: Norton.
Padian, Kevin. 2013. “Correcting Some Common Misrepresentations of Evolution in Textbooks and the Media.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 6(11): 1–13.
Stoltzfus, Arlin, Cable, Kele. 2014. “Mendelian-Mutationism: The Forgotten Evolutionary Synthesis.” Journal of the History of Biology 47: 501–546.
Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1867. “Creation by law.” Quarterly Journal of Science 4(October): 471–488.
Weismann, August. 1902. On Germinal Selection as a Source of Definite Variation (Thomas J. McCormack, Trans), 2nd Aufl. Chicago: Open Court.
Wilson, Leonard G. 1970. Sir Charles Lyell’s Scientific Journals on the Species Question. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.
Winther, Rasmus. 2001. “August Weismann on Germ-Plasm Variation.” Journal of the History of Biology 34: 517–555.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beatty, J. The Creativity of Natural Selection? Part I: Darwin, Darwinism, and the Mutationists. J Hist Biol 49, 659–684 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9456-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9456-5