Skip to main content
Log in

“Enfant Terrible”: Lancelot Hogben’s Life and Work in the 1920s

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Until recently the British zoologist Lancelot Hogben (1895–1975) has usually appeared as a campaigning socialist, an anti-eugenicist or a popularizer of science in the literature. The focus has mainly been on Hogben after he became a professor of social biology at the London School of Economics in 1930. This paper focuses on Hogben’s life in the 1920s. Early in the decade, while based in London, he focused on cytology, but in 1922, after moving to Edinburgh, he turned his focus on experimental zoology, first concentrating on vertebrate endocrinology and later moving over to the comparative physiology of invertebrate muscle. In the early 1920s Hogben played an active role in the development of experimental zoology in Britain. As such he was a fearless critic of evolutionary and metaphysical speculations. But in this period Hogben’s career prospects were seriously hampered by his confrontational nature and serious depression. As a result he was forced to leave Britain in 1925. He first accepted a position in Canada and in the period 1927–1930 he was a professor of zoology in South Africa. This paper will also add crucial new material to James Tabery’s recent discussion of the history behind Hogben’s ideas about the interaction of heredity and environment in individual development. In addition a previously unknown Lamarckian controversy will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anker, Peder. 2004. “The Politics of Ecology in South Africa on the Radical Left.” Journal of the History of Biology 37: 303–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1984. “EW MacBride’s Lamarckian Eugenics and its Implications for the Social Sonstruction of Scientific Knowledge.” Annals of Science 41: 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 2001. Reconciling Science and Religion: The Debate in Early-Twentieth Century Britain. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 2009. Science for All: The Popularization in Early Twentieth-Century Britain. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, Stephen G. 2002. “How Theories became Knowledge: Morgan’s Chromosome Theory of Heredity in America and Britain.” Journal of the History of Biology 35: 471–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castle, W.E and Phillips, J.C. 1909. “A Successful Ovarian Transplantation in the Guinea-Pig, and its Bearing on Problems of Genetics.” Science 30: 312–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, Enid. 1931a. “Metabolic Changes Associated with Pigmentary Effector Activity and Pituitary Removal in Xenopus Laevis.–I. Respiratory Exchange.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 107: 486–503.

  • Charles, Enid. 1931b. “Comparative Studies of Sex Differences in Calcium and Magnesium Content of Serum.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 21: 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, Enid 1931c. “Metabolic Changes Associated with Pigmentary Effector Activity and Pituitary Removal in Xenopus laevis.–II. Calcium and Magnesium Content of the Serum.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 107: 504–510.

  • Charles, Enid. 1934. The Twilight of Parenthood: A Biological Study of the Decline of Population Growth. London:Watts and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, Enid and Hogben, Lancelot. 1933. “The Serum Calcium and Magnesium Level in the Ovarian Cycle of the Laying Hen.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 23: 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Frederick. 2015. August Weismann: Development, Heredity, and Evolution. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cock, A.G. 1979. “The Genetical Society in 1924: A Near Demise?” Heredity 42: 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delacampagne, C. 1999. A History of Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlingsson, Steindór J. 2002. “From Haeckelian Monist to Anti-Haeckelian Vitalist: The Transformation of the Icelandic Naturalist Thorvaldur Thoroddsen (1855–1921).” The Journal of the History of Biology 35: 443–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlingsson, Steindór J. 2005. “The Rise of Experimental Zoology in Britain in the 1920s: Hogben, Huxley, Crew, and the Society for Experimental Biology.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester.

  • Erlingsson, Steindór J. 2009a. “The Plymouth Laboratory and the Institutionalisation of Experimental Zoology in Britain in the 1920s.” The Journal of the History of Biology 42: 151–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlingsson, Steindór J. 2009b. “The Costs of Being a Restless Intellect: Julian Huxley’s Popular and Scientific Career in the 1920s.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40: 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlingsson, Steindór J. 2013. “Institutions and Innovations: Experimental Zoology and the Creation of the British Journal of Experimental Biology and the Society for Experimental Biology.” The British Journal for the History of Science 46: 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finley, G.F. 1924. “The Effect of Different Species’ Lens Antisera on Pregnant Mice and Rats and their Progeny.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 1: 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, F.W. 1925. “The Physiology of Colour Change.” Nature 115: 147–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliboff, Sander. 2006. “The Case of Paul Kammerer: Evolution and Experimentation in the Early 20th Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 39: 525–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, E.S. 1915. “The Development of the Invertebrates: A Review of Textbook of Embryology; Vol. 1, Invertebrata, by E. W. MacBride.” Nature 95: 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, ES. 1921. “Some Problems in Evolution.” Science 54: 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, M.F. 1925. “Soma and Germ.” American Naturalist 59: 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, M.F and Smith, E.A. 1918. “Studies in Cytolysins, I: Some Prenatal effects of Lens Antibodies.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 26: 171–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, MF, Smith, EA. 1920. “Studies in Cytolysins, II: Further Induction of Eye-Defects by Antibodies and their Hereditary Transmission.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 32: 171–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, Viktor. 1997. “Wilhelm Roux: Visionary with a Blind Spot.” Journal of the History of Biology 30: 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Enid. 1930. An Enquiry into Metabolic Changes Associated with Pigmentary Effector Activity, and the Removal of the Pituitary Gland in Xenopus laevis: and a Contribution to Sexual Differences in Serum Constituents of Other Species. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cape Town.

  • Hogben, Enid and Zoond, Alexander. 1930. “Respiratory Exchange in the Freshwater Crab, Potamonautes perlatus.” Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 18: 283–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1920a. “On Certain Nuclear Phenomena in the Oocytes of the Gall-fly Neuroterus.” Journal of the Linnean Society, Zoology 34: 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1920b. “The Problem of Synapsis.” Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society 40(3): 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1920c. “Studies on Synapsis, I: Oogenesis in the Hymenoptera.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 91: 268–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1920d. “Studies on Synapsis, II: Parallel Conjugation and the Prophase Complex in Periplaneta with Special Reference to the Premeiotic Telophase.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 91: 268–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1920e. “Recapitulation and descent.” Nature 106: 212–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1921a. “Studies on Synapsis, III: The Nuclear Organisation of the Germ Cells in Libellula depressa.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 92: 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1921b. “A Preliminary Account of the Spermatogenesis of Sphenodon.” Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society 41(4): 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1923a. “Studies on Internal Secretion, I: The Effect of Pituitary (Anterior Lobe) Injection upon normal and Hypophysectomised Axolotls.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.Series B 94: 204–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1923b. “The Origin of Pituitary Secretions.” The British Medical Journal 1(3245): 442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1924a. “The Pigmentary Effector System, IV: A Further Contribution to the Role of Pituitary Secretion in Amphibian Colour Response.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 1: 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1924b. “The Relation of Internal Secretion to Reproduction and Growth in the Domestic Fowl, II: The Perenteral Administration of Certain Endocrine Extracts.” Veterinary Journal 80(5): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1924c. The Pigmentary Effector System. Edinburgh:Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1924d. “Review of Essays of a Biologist.” Scientific Worker 5: 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1925a. “Studies on the Pituitary, V: The Avian Depressor Response.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 15: 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1925b. “Studies on the Comparative Physiology of Contractile Tissues, I: The Action of Electrolytes on Invertebrate Muscle.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 15: 263–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1926a. “Some Observations on the Dissociation of Haemocyanin by the Colorimetric Method.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 3: 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1926b. Comparative Physiology. London:Sidgwick & Jackson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1927a. Principles of Evolutionary Biology. Cape Town:Juta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1927b. “A Method for the Study of Dissociation of Haeomcyanin.” Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 14: 373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1930. The Nature of Living Matter. London:Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1931. “The Foundations of Social Biology.” Economica 0(31): 4–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1974. “Francis Albert Eley Crew.” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 20: 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot. 1998. Lancelot Hogben: Scientific Humanist. Rendlesham:Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot and Crew, F.A.E. 1923. “Studies on Internal Secretion, II: Endocrine Activity in Foetal and Embryonic Life.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 1: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot and Hobson, A.D. 1924. “Studies on Internal Secretions, III: The Action of Pituitary Extracts and Adrenaline on Contractile Tissue of Certain Invertebrata.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 1: 487–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot and Winton, F.R. 1922a. “The Pigmentary Effector System, I: Reaction of Frog’s Melanophores to Pituitary Extracts.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 93: 318–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot, Winton, FR. 1922b. “The Pigmentary Effector System, II.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 94: 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot, Winton, FR. 1922c. “Studies on the Pituitary, I: The Melanophore Stimulant in Posterior Lobe Extracts.” Biochemical Journal 16: 619–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot, Winton, FR. 1923a. “The Pigmentary Effector System, III: Colour Response in the Hypophysectomised Frog.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 95: 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot, Winton, FR. 1923b. “Studies on the Pituitary, II: The Influence of Hypophysectomy on the rate of Carbon-dioxide Production on Frogs.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 13: 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot, Winton, FR. 1924. An Introduction to Recent Advances in Comparative Physiology. New York:The MacMillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot and de Beer, G.R. 1925. “Studies on the Pituitary, VI: Localisation and Phyletic Distribution of Active Materials.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 15: 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot and Schlapp, W. 1924. “Studies on the Pituitary, III: The Vasomotor Extracts Throughout the Vertebrate Series.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 14: 229–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot, Schlapp, W and MacDonald, A.D. 1924. “Studies on the Pituitary, IV: Quantitative Compression of Pressor Activity.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 14: 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot and Pinhey, K.F. 1926a. “Viscous-elastic Changes in Muscle Contraction.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 4: 196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot, Pinhey, KF. 1926b. “A Comparison between the Dissociation of the Haemocyanin of Helix and Crustacea.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 4: 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot, Pinhey, KF. 1927. “Some Observations on the Haemocyanin of Limultus.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 5: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot and Van Der Lingen, J. 1928. “On the Occurrence of Haemoglobin and of Erythrocytes in the Periviceral Fluid of Holothurian.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 5: 292–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot, Charles, Enid and Slome, David. 1931. “Studies On The Pituitary VIII. The Relation Of The Pituitary Gland To Calcium Metabolism And Ovarian Function In Xenopus.” Journal of Experimental Biology 8: 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot and Charles, Enid. 1932. “Studies on the Pituitary IX. Changes in Blood Calcium Following Injection of Anterior Lobe Extracts and Sexual Excitement in Female Rabbits.” Journal of Experimental Biology 9: 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian. 1920. “Metamorphosis of Axolotl caused by Thyroid-feeding.” Nature 104: 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian 1920–1921. “The Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Science Progress in the Twentieth Century 15: 640–641.

  • Huxley, Julian 1921–1922. “The Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Science Progress in the twentieth Century 16: 299–300.

  • Huxley, Julian. 1923. Essays of a Biologist. London:Chatto & Windus.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian and Carr-Saunders, A.M. 1924. “Absence of Prenatal Effects of Lens-Antibodies in Rabbits.” British Journal of Experimental Biology 1: 215–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian and Hogben, Lancelot. 1922. “Experiments on Amphibian Metamorphosis and Pigment Responses in Relation to Internal Secretions.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 93: 268–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson, Wilfred. 1909. Experimental Embryology. Oxford:The Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Primo. 1989. The Drowned and the Saved. New York:Vintage International.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBride, E.W. 1914. Textbook of Embryology. London:MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBride, EW. 1920. “Recapitulation and Descent.” Nature 106: 280–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacBride, E. W. 1920–1921a. “The Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Science Progress in the Twentieth Century 15: 392–405.

  • MacBride, E. W. 1920–1921b. “The Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Science Progress in the Twentieth Century 15: 642–644.

  • Mazumdar, Pauline M.H. 1992. Eugenics, Human Genetics, and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, Its Sources and Its Critics in Britain. London:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T.H. 1925. Evolution and Genetics. Princeton:Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NN. 1929a. “What is Life?” Nature 124: 397–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NN. 1929b. “News and Views.” Nature 124: 960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantin, C.F.A and Hogben, Lancelot. 1925. “A Colorimetric Method for Studying the Dissociation of Oxyhæmocyanin suitable for Class Work.” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 13: 970–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Diane B. 1995. Controlling Human Heredity: 1865 to the Present. Atlantic High-lands, NJ:Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Diane B. 1998. The Politics of Heredity: Essays on Eugenics, Biomedicine, and the Nature-Nurture Debate. Albany:State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Erik L. 2008. “William Bateson from Balanoglossus to Materials for the Study of Variation: The Transatlantic Roots of Discontinuity and the (Un)naturalness of Selection.” Journal of the History of Biology 41: 267–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, Chris. 2014. “Completing the Circle of the Social Sciences? William Beveridge and Social Biology at London School of Economics during the 1930s.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4: 478–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. 1985. “Embryology and Classical Zoology in Great Britain.” TJ Horder, JA Witkowski (eds.), History of Embryology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 2009. “Sources of Wilhelm Johannsen’s Genotype Theory.” Journal of the History of Biology 42: 457–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1916. Principles of Social Reconstruction. London:Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, Sahotra. 1996. “Lancelot Hogben, 1895–1975.” Genetics 142: 655–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, Gavin. 2005. “Like a Baby with a Box of Matches’: British Scientists and the Concept of ‘Race’ in the Inter-War Period.” British Journal for the History of Science 38: 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, Gavin. 2008. Racial Science and British Society, 1930-62. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, Marianne. 2014. “Biology as a Technology of Social Justice in Interwar Britain: Arguments from Evolutionary History, Heredity, and Human Diversity.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 39: 561–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltzfus, Arlin and Cable, Kele. 2014. “Mendelian-Mutationism: The Forgotten Evolutionary Synthesis.” Journal of the History of Biology 47: 501–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery, James. 2008. “R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype-Environment Interaction.” Journal of the History of Biology 41: 717–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery, James. 2014. Beyond Versus: The Struggle to Understand the Interaction of Nature and Nurture. Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery, James and Sarkar, Sahotra. Forthcoming. “R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the ‘competition’ for the Chair of Social Biology at the London School of Economics in 1930: Correcting the Legend.” Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, doi:10.1098/rsnr.2014.0065.te.

  • Waisbren, Steven James. 1988. “The Importance of Morphology in the Evolutionary Synthesis as Demonstrated by the Contribution of the Oxford Group: Goodrich, Huxley, and de Beer.” Journal of the History of Biology 21: 291–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wargon, Sylvia. 2005. “Legacy of Enid Charles, 1894-1972.” Canadian Studies in Population 32(2): 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D.M.S. 1931. “Vitalism and Mechanism.” Supplement to “Nature” 16: 350–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G.P. 1978. “Lancelot Thomas Hogben.” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 24: 183–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werskey, Gary. 1978. The Visible College. London:Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther, Rasmus G. 2001. “August Weismann on Germ-Plasm Variation.” Journal of the History of Biology 34: 517–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J.H. 1931. “Review of: The Nature of Living Matter.” Mind 40: 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoond, Alexander and Charles, Enid. 1931. “Studies in the Localisation of Respiratory Exchange in Invertebrates I. The Respiratory Mechanism of the Fresh-Water Crab Potamonautes.” Journal of Experimental Biology 8: 250–257.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steindór J. Erlingsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erlingsson, S.J. “Enfant Terrible”: Lancelot Hogben’s Life and Work in the 1920s. J Hist Biol 49, 495–526 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9427-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9427-2

Keywords

Navigation