Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Systems Thinking Versus Population Thinking: Genotype Integration and Chromosomal Organization 1930s–1950s

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes how empirical discoveries in the 1930s–1950s regarding population variation for chromosomal inversions affected Theodosius Dobzhansky and Richard Goldschmidt. A significant fraction of the empirical work I discuss was done by Dobzhansky and his coworkers; Goldschmidt was an astute interpreter, with strong and unusual commitments. I argue that both belong to a mechanistic tradition in genetics, concerned with the effects of chromosomal organization and systems on the inheritance patterns of species. Their different trajectories illustrate how scientists’ commitments affect how they interpret new evidence and adjust to it. Dobzhansky was moved to revised views about selection, while Goldschmidt moved his attention to different genetic phenomena. However different, there are significant connections between the two that enrich our understanding of their views. I focus on two: the role of developmental considerations in Dobzhansky’s thought and the role of neutrality and drift in Goldschmidt’s evolutionary account. Dobzhansky’s struggle with chromosomal variation is not solely about competing schools of thought within the selectionist camp, as insightfully articulated by John Beatty, but also a story of competition between selectionist thinking and developmental perspectives. In contraposition, Goldschmidt emphasized the role of low penetrance mutations that spread neutrally and pointed out that drift could result from developmental canalization. This account adds to the dominant story about Goldschmidt’s resistance to the splitting of development from genetics, as told by Garland Allen and Michael Dietrich. The story I tell illustrates how developmental thinking and genetic thinking conflicted and influenced researchers with different convictions about the significance of chromosomal organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beatty, John. 1987a. “Dobzhansky and Drift: Facts, Values, and Chance in Evolutionary Biology.” L. Krüger (ed.), The Probabilistic Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1987b. “Weighing the Risks: Stalemate in the Classical/Balance Controversy.” Journal of the History of Biology 20: 289–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1994. “Dobzhansky and the Biology of Democracy: The Moral and Political Significance of Genetic Variation.” M. Adams (ed.), The Evolution of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brncic, Danko. 1954. “Heterosis and the Integration of the Genotype in Geographic Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.” Genetics 39(1): 77–88.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Elof Axel. 1966. The Gene: A Critical History. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Hampton L. 1980. “Cytogenetics and the Neo-Darwinian Synthesis.” Ernst Mayr and William Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetverikov, Sergey S. 1961. “On Certain Aspects of the Evolutionary Process from the Standpoint of Modern Genetics.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 105(2): 167–195.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, James. 1987. “Muller, and Overdominance.” Journal of the History of Biology 20: 351–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, Cyril Dean and Mather, Kenneth. 1950. The Elements of Genetics. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gregory, Dietrich, Michael, and Jacobs, David. 2009. “Homeotic Mutants and the Assimilation of Developmental Genetics into the Evolutionary Synthesis.” Joe Cain and Michael Ruse (eds.), Descended from Darwin: Insights into American Evolutionary Studies, 1900–1970. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Michael R. 2000a. “From Gene to Genetic Hierarchy: Richard Goldschmidt and the Problem of the Gene.” P. Beurton, R. Falk, and H. Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–114.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2000b. “From Hopeful Monsters to Homeotic Effects: Richard Goldschmidt’s Integration of Development, Evolution, and Genetics.” American Zoologist 40(5): 738–747. doi:10.1093/icb/40.5.738.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2008. “Striking the Hornet’s Nest: Richard Goldschmidt’s Rejection of the Particulate Gene.” O. Harman and M.R. Dietrich (eds.), Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2011. “Reinventing Richard Goldschmidt: Reputation, Memory, and Biography.” Journal of the History of Biology. doi:10.1007/s10739-011-9271-y.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1932. “The Baroid Mutation in Drosophila Melanogaster.” Genetics 17(4): 369–392.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. 1935. “The Y Chromosome of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.” Genetics 20(4): 366–76.

  • ——. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1939. “Genetics of Natural Populations IX. Temporal Changes in the Composition of Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 28(2): 162.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1950. “Genetics of Natural Populations XIX. Origin of Heterosis through Natural Selection in Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura to Natural Selection.” Genetics 35(3): 288

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1951. Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1952. “Nature and Origin of Heterosis.” J. Gowen (ed.), Heterosis. Ames, IA: Iowa State College Press, pp. 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1953. “Some New Trends in Population Genetics and in Evolutionary Studies.” A.A. Buzzati-Traverso (ed.), International Union of Biological Sciences Symposium on Genetics and Population Structure. Pavia: IUBS, pp. 95–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1955. “A Review of Some Fundamental Concepts and Problems of Population Genetics.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20: 1–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1962. Mankind Evolving. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius and Levene, Howard. 1955. “Genetics of Natural Populations. XXIV. Developmental Homeostasis in Natural Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 40(6): 797–808.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius and Sturtevant, Alfred H. 1938. “Inversions in the Chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 23(1): 28–64.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinin, Nikolai P. and Tiniakov, G.G. 1945. “Seasonal Cycles and the Concentration of Inversions in Populations of Drosophila funebris.” American Naturalist 79: 570–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1946a. “Inversion Gradients and Natural Selection in Ecological Races of Drosophila funebris.” Genetics 31(6): 537.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1946b. “Natural Selection and Chromosomal Variability in Populations of Drosophila funebris.” Journal of Heredity 37(2): 39–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, Joseph. 1974. “The Evolutionary Advantage of Recombination.” Genetics 78(2): 737–756.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Ronald A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gannett, Lisa. 2013. “Theodosius Dobzhansky and the Genetic Race Concept.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44(3): 250–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Abraham H. 2013. “Edward O. Wilson and the Organicist Tradition.” Journal of the History of Biology 46(4): 599–630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Scott F. 1978. “The Embryological Origins of the Gene Theory.” Journal of the History of Biology 11(2): 307–351. doi:10.1007/BF00389303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1933. “Some Aspects of Evolution.” Science 78(2033): 539–547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1937a, “Spontaneous Chromatin Rearrangements and Theory of Gene,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 23: 621–623.

  • ——. 1937b, “Spontaneous Chromatin Rearrangements in Drosophila,” Nature, 140(3548): 767.

  • ——. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1938. Physiological Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1946. “An Empirical Evolutionary Generalization Viewed from the Standpoint of Phenogenetics.” American Naturalist 80(792): 305–317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1952. “Homoeotic Mutants and Evolution.” Acta Biotheoretica 10(1–2): 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1954. “Different Philosophies of Genetics.” Science 119(3099): 703–710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1955. Theoretical Genetics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1960. In and Out of the Ivory Tower: The Autobiography of Richard B. Goldschmidt. Seattle: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Brian K. 2005. “Fifty Years Later: I. Michael Lerner’s Genetic Homeostasis (1954)—A Valiant Attempt to Integrate Genes, Organisms and Environment.” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 304B(3): 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Oren S. 2004. The Man Who Invented the Chromosome: A Life of Cyril Darlington. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian. 2010[1942]. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Ives, Philip Truman. 1947. “Second Chromosome Inversions in Wild Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster.” Evolution 1(1/2): 42–47. doi:10.2307/2405402.

  • Kohler, R.E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, Ehud. 2014. “The Genome as a Developmental Organ.” The Journal of Physiology 592(11): 2283–2293.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I. Michael. 1954. Genetic Homeostasis. London: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, Richard C. 1981. “The Scientific Work of Th. Dobzhansky.” R.C. Lewontin, John A. Moore, William B. Provine, and Bruce Wallace (eds.), Dobzhansky’s Genetics of Natural Populations I–XLIII. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, Richard C., Moore, John A., Provine, William B., and Wallace, B. (eds.). 1981. Dobzhansky’s Genetics of Natural Populations I–XLIII. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, Kenneth. 1943. “Polygenic Inheritance and Natural Selection.” Biological Reviews 18(1): 32–64. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1943.tb00287.x.

  • Mather, Kenneth. 1955. “Polymorphism as an Outcome of Disruptive Selection.” Evolution 9(1): 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitman, Greg. 1992. Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought, 1900–1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, Herman J. 1932. “Some Genetic Aspects of Sex.” The American Naturalist 66(703): 118–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provine, William B. 1981. “Origin of the GNP Series.” R.C. Lewontin, John A. Moore, William B. Provine, and Bruce Wallace (eds.), Dobzhansky’s Genetics of Natural Populations I–XLIII. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, Theophilus S. 1934. “Salivary Chromosomes and the Attack on the Gene.” Journal of Heredity 25(12): 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Marsha L. 2007. “The Cell as the Basis for Heredity, Development, and Evolution: Richard Goldschmidt’s Program of Physiological Genetics.” M.D. Laubichler and J. Maienschein (eds.), From Embryology to Evo-Devo. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 169–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 2009. “Sources of Wilhelm Johannsen’s Genotype Theory.” Journal of the History of Biology 42(3): 457–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2014a. “Commentary: Wilhelm Johannsen and the Problem of Heredity at the Turn of the 19th Century.” International Journal of Epidemiology 43(4): 1007–1013.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2014b. “The Holist Tradition in Twentieth Century Genetics. Wilhelm Johannsen’s Genotype Concept.” The Journal of Physiology 592(11): 2431–2438.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, Jan. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smocovitis, V.B. 1996. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, Alfred H. 1917. “Genetic Factors Affecting the Strength of Linkage in Drosophila.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 3(9): 555.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, Alfred H. and Mather, Kenneth. 1938. “The Interrelations of Inversions, Heterosis and Recombination.” The American Naturalist 72(742): 447–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoday, John M. 1955. “Balance, Heterozygosity and Developmental Stability.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20: 318–326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vetukhiv, Mikhail. 1953. “Viability of Hybrids between Local Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 39(1): 30.

  • Waddington, Conrad H. 1941. “Evolution of Developmental Systems.” Nature 147(3717): 108–110.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1961. The Nature of Life. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Bruce. 1994. “Theodosius Dobzhansky Remembered: Genetic Coadaptation.” M Adams (ed.), The Evolution of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sewall. 1941. “The Material Basis of Evolution.” The Scientific Monthly 53(2): 165–170.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sewall and Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1946. “Genetics of Natural Populations. XII. Experimental Reproduction of Some of the Changes Caused by Natural Selection in Certain Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 31(2): 12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Sciences and Ideas, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Ehud Lamm

Authors
  1. Ehud Lamm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehud Lamm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lamm, E. Systems Thinking Versus Population Thinking: Genotype Integration and Chromosomal Organization 1930s–1950s. J Hist Biol 48, 641–677 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9400-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9400-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation