Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cancer, Conflict, and the Development of Nuclear Transplantation Techniques

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The technique of nuclear transplantation – popularly known as cloning – has been integrated into several different histories of twentieth century biology. Historians and science scholars have situated nuclear transplantation within narratives of scientific practice, biotechnology, bioethics, biomedicine, and changing views of life. However, nuclear transplantation has never been the focus of analysis. In this article, I examine the development of nuclear transplantation techniques, focusing on the people, motivations, and institutions associated with the first successful nuclear transfer in metazoans in 1952. The conflict between embryologists and geneticists over the mechanisms of differentiation motivated Robert Briggs to pursue nuclear transplantation experiments as a way to resolve the debate. Briggs worked at the Lankenau Hospital Research Institute, a research facility devoted to the study of cancer. The goal of understanding cancer would play a role in the development of the technique, and the story of nuclear transplantation sheds light on the role that biomedical contexts play in biological research in the second half of the twentieth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Garland. 1974. “Opposition to the Mendelian-Chromosome Theory: The Physiological and Developmental Genetics of Richard Goldschmidt.” Journal of the History of Biology 7: 749–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Garland. 1986. “T. H. Morgan and the Split Between Embryology and Genetics, 1910–1935.” T.J. Horder, J.A. Witkowski, and C.C. Wylie (eds.), A History of Embryology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.F. 1975. “Jack Schultz (1904–1971).” Genetics 81: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armon, R. 2012. “Between Biochemists and Embryologists – The Biochemical Study of Embryonic Induction in the 1930s.” Journal of the History of Biology 45: 65–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, Robert A. 2007. Unnatural History: Breast Cancer and American Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, William. 2006. Discovering Cell Mechanisms: The Creation of Modern Cell Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Robert W. 1939. “Changes in the Density of the Frog Embryo (Rana pipiens) During Development.” Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 13: 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Robert W. 1946. “Effects on the Growth Inhibitor, Hexenolactone, on Frog Embryos. I. Effects of Diploid Embryos. II. Differential Effects on Haploid and Diploid Embryos.” Growth 10: 45–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Robert W., Green, E.U., and King, Thomas. 1951. “An Investigation of the Capacity for Cleavage and Differentiation in Rana pipiens Eggs Lacking ‘Functional’ Chromosomes.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 116: 455–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Robert W., and King, Thomas. 1952. “Transplantation of Living Nuclei from Blastula Cells into Enucleated Frogs’ Eggs.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 38: 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Robert W., and King, Thomas. 1953. “Factors Affecting the Transplantability of Nuclei of Frog Embryonic Cells.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 122: 485–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bud, Robert. 1978. “Strategy in American Cancer Research After World War II: A Case Study.” Social Studies of Science 8: 425–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bud, Robert. 1993. The Uses of Life: A History of Biotechnology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, Richard. 2005. “Lillie’s Paradox – Or, Some Hazards of Cellular Geography.” The Epistemology of Development, Evolution, and Genetics: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Burian, Richard M., Gayon, Jean, and Zallen, Doris T. 1991. “Boris Ephrussi and the Synthesis of Genetics and Embryology.” Scott Gilbert (ed.), A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambrosio, Alberto, Keating, Peter, and Tauber, Alfred I. 1994. “Introduction: Immunology as a Historical Object.” Journal of the History of Biology 27: 375–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Keith H.S. 2007. “Ten Years of Cloning: Questions Answered and Personal Reflections.” Cloning and Stem Cells 9: 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, Georges. 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. Translated by Carolyn R. Fawcett. New York: Zone Books.

  • Cantor, David. 2008. Cancer in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. Coddell. 2003. The Rise of Causal Concepts of Disease: Case Histories. Hants: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comandon, J., and de Fonbrune, P. 1939. “Greffe Nucleaires Totale, Simple ou Multiple, chez une Amibe.” Comptes Rendus des Seances de la Societe de Biologie et de ses Filiales 130: 744–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, Nathan. 2011. “A ‘Fantastical’ Experiment: Motivations, Practice, and Conflict in the History of Nuclear Transplantation, 1925–1970.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota.

  • Davson, Hugh, and Danielli, James Frederic. 1950. The Permeability of Natural Membranes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Berardino, Marie. 1997. Genomic Potential of Differentiated Cells. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Berardino, Marie. 2011. “Interview by Author.” Digital Recording, Haverford, PA, March 2.

  • Dietrich, Michael. 2000. “From Hopeful Monsters to Homeotic Effects: Richard Goldschmidt’s Integration of Development, Evolution, and Genetics.” American Zoologist 40: 738–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Faculty Profile: Leigh Hoadley.” 1941, October 10. The Harvard Crimson. Cambridge. Retrieved from http://www.thecrimson.harvard.edu/article/1941/10/10/faculty-profile-pthe-captain-announced-to/?print=1.

  • Franklin, Sarah. 2007. Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of a Genealogy. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura, Joan H. 1995. “Ecologies of Action: Recombining Genes, Molecularizing Cancer, and Transforming Biology.” Susan Leigh Star (ed.), Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura, Joan H. 1996. Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Fundamental Cancer Research – Report of a Committee Appointed by the Surgeon General.” 1957. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 19: 317–328. Reprinted from Public Health Reports 53(1938): 2121–2130.

  • Gilbert, Scott. 1988. “Cellular Politics: Ernest Everett Just, Richard B. Goldschmidt and the Attempt to Reconcile Embryology and Genetics.” R. Rainger, K. Benson, and J. Maienschein (eds.), The American Development of Biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Scott. 1991. Induction and the Origins of Developmental Genetics. A Conceptual History of Developmental Biology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Scott. 1998. “Bearing Crosses: A Historiography of Genetics and Embryology.” American Journal of Medical Genetics 76: 168–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorbman, Aubrey. 1979. “Emil Witschi and the Problem of Vertebrate Sexual Differentiation.” American Zoologist 19: 1261–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon, John. 1962a. “The Developmental Capacity of Nuclei Taken from Intestinal Epithelium Cells of Feeding Tadpoles.” Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 10: 622–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon, John. 1962b. “Adult Frogs Derived from the Nuclei of Single Somatic Cells.” Developmental Biology 4: 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon, John, and Byrne, J.A. 2003. “The First Half-Century of Nuclear Transplantation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 8048–8052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon, John, Elsdale, Thomas, and Fischberg, Michel. 1958. “Sexually Mature Individuals of Xenopus laevis from the Transplantation of Single Somatic Nuclei.” Nature 182: 64–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon, John, and Hopwood, Nick. 2000. “The Introduction of Xenopus laevis into Developmental Biology: Of Empire, Pregnancy Testing and Ribosomal Genes.” The International Journal of Developmental Biology 44: 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, Victor. 1988. The Heritage of Experimental Embryology: Hans Spemann and the Organizer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammett, Frederick S. 1937. “Introduction.” Growth 1.

  • Harwood, Jonathan. 1993. Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community 1900–1933. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoadley, Leigh. 1934. “A Device for Micromanipulation.” Science 80(2076): 338–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoadley, Leigh. 1950. “Founding of the Society for Study of Development and Growth.” Growth 14.

  • Horder, T.J., Witkowski, J.A., and Wylie, C.C. (eds.). 1985. A History of Embryology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Sally Smith. 1977. The Virus: A History of the Concept. New York: Science History Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Sally Smith. 2011. Genentech: The Beginnings of Biotech. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, François, and Monod, Jacqués. 1961. “Genetic Regulatory Mechanisms in the Synthesis of Proteins.” Journal of Molecular Biology 3: 318–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Peter, and Cambrosio, Alberto. 2003. Biomedical Platforms: Realigning the Normal and the Pathological in Late-Twentieth-Century Medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Peter, and Cambrosio, Alberto. 2004. “Does Biomedicine Entail the Successful Reduction of Pathology to Biology?” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47: 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass, Leon. 2002. Human Cloning and Human Dignity: The Report of the President’s Council on Bioethics. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel. 2003. “Pursuing the Unpopular: A History of Courage, Viruses, and Cancer.” Robert B. Silvers (ed.), Hidden Histories of Science. New York: New York Review of Books, pp. 69–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Thomas, and Briggs, R.W. 1955. “Changes in the Nuclei of Differentiating Gastrula Cells, as Demonstrated by Nuclear Transplantation.” PNAS 41: 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Thomas, and Briggs, R.W. 1956. “Serial Transplantation of Embryonic Nuclei.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. Genetic Mechanisms: Structure and Function. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Long Island Biological Association.

  • King, Thomas, and McKinnell, Robert. 1960. “An Attempt to Determine the Developmental Potentialities of the Cancer Cell Nucleus by Means of Transplantation.” Cell Physiology of Neoplasia. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 591–617.

  • Kohler, Robert E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolata, Gina. 1998. Clone: The Road to Dolly, and the Path Ahead. New York: W. Morrow & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreeger, Karen. 2004. “America’s First Cancer Center Celebrates Centennial.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 96: 171–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, Hannah. 2007. Culturing Life: How Cells Become Technologies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, Manfred D., and Davidson, Eric H. 2008. “Boveri’s Long Experiment: Sea Urchin Merogones and the Establishment of the Role of Nuclear Chromosomes in Development.” Developmental Biology 314: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, Manfred, and Maienschein, Jane. 2007. From Embryology to Evo-Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, Manfred, and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2004. “Alfred Kühn (1885–1968) and Developmental Evolution.” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 302B: 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindee, M. Susan. 2005. Moments of Truth in Genetic Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, J., and Danielli, J.F. 1950. “Transplantation of Nuclei from Cell to Cell.” Nature 166: 329–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löwy, Ilana. 1994. “Experimental Systems and Clinical Practices: Tumor Immunology and Cancer Immunotherapy, 1895–1980.” Journal of the History of Biology 27: 403–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, Jane. 1978. “Cell Lineage, Ancestral Reminiscence, and the Biogenetic Law.” Journal of the History of Biology 11: 129–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, Jane. 1991. Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, Jane. 2001. “On Cloning: Advocating History of Biology in the Public Interest.” Journal of the History of Biology 34(3): 423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, Jane. 2005. Whose View of Life: Embryos, Cloning, and Stem Cells. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnell, Robert Gilmore. 1979. Cloning: A Biologist Reports. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnell, Robert Gilmore, and Di Berardino, Marie. 1999. “The Biology of Cloning: History and Rationale.” Bioscience 49: 875–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, Alan R. 1971. “Howard T. Karsner, 1879–1970.” American Journal of Pathology 62: 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, Siddhartha. 2010. The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Joseph. 1933. “On the Dissociability of the Fundamental Processes in Ontogenesis.” Biological Reviews 8: 180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Joseph. 1936. Order and Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Oppenheimer, Jane M. 1966. “The Growth and Development of Developmental Biology.” M. Locke (ed.), Major Problems in Developmental Biology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Elizabeth K. 1984. “Growth – The Early History of a Cancer Research Institute: 1927–1957.” TMs (photocopy), Fox Chase Cancer Center Archives, Fox Chase, PA.

  • Patterson, James T. 1987. The Dread Disease: Cancer and Modern American Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Philip J. 1987. Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb & the Engineering Ideal in Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Philip J. 1988. “Summer Resort and Scientific Discipline: Woods Hole and the Structure of American Biology, 1882–1925.” Ronald Rainger, Keith R. Benson, and Jane Maienschein (eds.), The American Development of Biology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 121–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Philip J. 2002. Biologists and the Promise of American Life: From Meriwether Lewis to Alfred Kinsey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinell, Patrice. 2000. “Cancer.” Roger Cooter and David Pickstone (eds.), Medicine in the Twentieth Century. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 671–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, Robert N. 1995. Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don’t Know About Cancer. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rader, Karen A. 2004. Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainger, Ronald, Benson, Keith, and Maienschein, Jane (eds.). 1988. The American Development of Biology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rather, L.J. 1978. The Genesis of Cancer: A Study in the History of Ideas. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, Stanley, 1950. “[Untitled],” Growth 14.

  • “Research Feat Reported: 2 Doctors Shift Living Nuclei of Nerve Cell to Another.” 1953. New York Times 31.

  • Richmond, Marsha. 2007. “The Cell as the Basis for Heredity, Development, and Evolution: Richard Goldschmidt’s Program of Physiological Genetics.” Manfred Laubichler and Jane Maienschein (eds.), From Embryology to Evo-Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudkin, George. 1971. “Obituaries: Jack Schultz, 7 May 1904–29 April 1971.” Genetics Supplement 97–98.

  • Sapp, Jan. 1983. “The Struggle for Authority in the Field of Heredity, 1900–1932: New Perspectives on the Rise of Genetics.” Journal of the History of Biology 16: 311–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, Jan. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J. 1929. “The Minute Reaction in the Development of Drosophila melanogaster.” Genetics 14: 366–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J. 1941. “The Evidence of the Nucleoprotein Nature of the Gene.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 9: 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J. 1950. “The Question of Plasmagenes.” Science 111: 407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimkin, Michael B. 1957. “Thirteen Questions: Some Historical Outlines for Cancer Research.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 19(1957): 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimkin, Michael B. 1977. Contrary to Nature. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Publication No. (NIH) 76-720. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.

  • Sonneborn, Tracy M. 1948. “Genes, Cytoplasm, and Environment in Paramecium.” The Scientific Monthly 67(September): 154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spemann, Hans. 1938. Embryonic Development and Induction. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, W. 1986. “James Frederic Danielli. 13 November 1911–22 April 1984.” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 32(December): 116–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomes, Nancy. 1998. The Gospel of Germs: Men, Women, and the Microbe in American Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldby, Catherine, and Mitchell, Robert. 2006. Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Robert A. 1996. Racing to the Beginning of the Road: The Search for the Origin of Cancer. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Philip R. 1950. “The Origins of the Journal Growth.” Growth 14: 258–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmut, Ian, Campbell, Keith, and Tudge, Colin. 2000. The Second Creation: Dolly and the Age of Biological Control. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmut, Ian, Campbell, Keith, and Tudge, Colin. 2007. “The 10th Anniversary of the Dolly Experiment.” Cloning and Stem Cells 9: 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Life Science C Wing, Center for Biology and Society, Arizona State University, PO Box 873301, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Nathan Crowe

Authors
  1. Nathan Crowe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Crowe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crowe, N. Cancer, Conflict, and the Development of Nuclear Transplantation Techniques. J Hist Biol 47, 63–105 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-013-9359-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-013-9359-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation