Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experiments, Causation, and the Uses of Vivisection in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Defining experiment was particularly vexed in the realm of anatomical dissection and vivisection. Was dissection merely descriptive, or something more? Harvey's discovery of the circulation of the blood and Aselli's discovery of the so-called lacteal veins shaped much anatomical research between the late 1620s and the 1650s. While the techniques of dissection and vivisection gained wide use, there was much debate on the validity of the circulation in particular, and its relationship to the lacteal veins. Critics, particularly the French anatomist Jean Riolan, but also the natural philosopher Pierre Gassendi, focused on the lack of causation in Harvey's method and the lack of medical use and not on his use of vivisection. Jean Pecquet's discovery of the thoracic duct in 1651 changed the terms of the debate by definitively connecting the circulation with the lacteals. Riolan's critiques of Pecquet in the 1650s show profoundly differing notions of the purpose of dissection. While Gassendi eventually accepted Harvey's concept of the circulation, Riolan never did.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aselli, Gaspare. 1640. De lactibus, sive Lacteis Venis, quarto vasorum mesaraicorum genere. Leiden: Jean Maire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 1659. New Atlantis, a Work Unfinished. London: Tho. Newcomb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Hyacinthe-Théodore. 1752. Quaestionum medicarum, quaecirca medicinae theoriam et praxim, ante duo saecula, in Scholis Facultatis Medicinae Parisiensis. Paris: Jean-Thomas Herissant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholin, Thomas. 1645. Casp. Bartholini Institutiones anatomicae, novis recentiorum opinionibus & observationibus. Leiden: Franciscus Hack.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholin, Thomas. 1653. Vasa Lymphatica, nuper Hafniae in Animantibus inventa, et Hepatis exseqviae. Copenhagen: Georg Holst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauhin, Caspar. 1605. Theatrum anatomicum. Frankfurt am Main: Matthäus Becker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2011. Mechanism, Experiment, Disease. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Harcourt. 1934. Scientific Organizations in Seventeenth-Century France. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corlieu, Auguste. 1880. Jacques Mentel, Docteur-Régent et Professeur à la Faculté de Médecine de Paris (1599–1670). Paris: Adrien Delahaye and E. LeCrosnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine. 1994. “Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe.” James Chandler, Arnold Davidson, Harry Harootunian (eds.), Questions of Evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 243–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, Peter. 1991. “Narratives, Anecdotes, and Experiments: Turning Experience into Science in the Seventeenth Century.” Peter Dear (ed.), The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument: Historical Studies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 135–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and Experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Laurens, André. 1600. Historia anatomica humani corporis. Paris: Marc Orry.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Roger. 1994. William Harvey’s Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gassendi, Pierre. 1630. Epistolica exercitatio, In qua Principia Philosophiae Roberti Flvddi Medici reteguntur. Paris: Sebastien Cramoisy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassendi, Pierre. 1658. Opera omnia in sex tomos divisa. Henri-Louis Habert de Montmor (ed.), 6 vols. Lyon: Laurent Anisson and Jean-Baptiste Devenet.

  • Guerrini, Anita. 1989. “The Ethics of Animal Experimentation in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of the History of Ideas 50: 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini, Anita. in progress. The Courtiers’ Anatomists. Animals and Humans in Louis XIV’s Paris.

  • Harvey, William. 1990. The Circulation of the Blood and other writings. Trans. Kenneth J. Franklin. London: J.M. Dent.

  • Kusukawa, S. 2010. “The Sources of Gessner’s Pictures for the Historia animalium.” Annals of Science 67: 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamy, Bernard. 1706. Entretiens sur les sciences, 3rd ed. Lyon: Jean Certe.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeClerc, Daniel, Manget, Jacques. 1699. Bibliotheca anatomica. Geneva: Johan. Anthon. Chouët & Davidis Ritter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Clerc, Daniel and Manget, Jacques. 1711. Bibliotheca anatomica. London: John Nutt for W. Lewis et al. English translation of 1699 edition.

  • Mani, Nikolaus. 1967. “Jean Riolan II (1580–1657) and Medical Research.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 42(1967): 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M.T. 1968. Galen on the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body, 2 vols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Mersenne, Marin. 1933–1988. Correspondance. P. Tannery et al. (eds.), 17 vols. Paris: CNRS.

  • Ogilvie, Brian. 2006. The Science of Describing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patin, Gui. 1846. Lettres. J.-H. Reveillé-Parise (ed.), 3 vols. Paris: Baillière.

  • Pecquet, Jean. 1651. Experimenta nova anatomica. Paris: Sebastien and Gabriel Cramoisy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecquet, Jean. 1653. New Anatomical Experiments of John Pecquet of Deip. London: T.W. for Octavian Pulleyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiresc, Nicolas Claude Fabri de. 1888–1898. Lettres de Peiresc. P. Tamizey de Larroque (ed.), 7 vols. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.

  • Pomata, Gianna. 2005. “Praxis Historialis: The Uses of Historia in Early Modern Medicine.” Gianna Pomata, Nancy G Siraisi (eds.), Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 105–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primrose, James. 1630. Iacobi Primirosii Doctoris Medici, exercitationes, et animadversiones in librum, De motu cordis, et circulatione sanguinis. London: William Jones for Nicholas Bourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolan, Jean. 1628. Oeuvres anatomiques. Trans. Pierre Constant, 2 vols. Paris: Denys Moreau.

  • Riolan, Jean. 1641. Advertissement a Theophraste Renaudot. Paris.

  • Riolan, Jean. 1649a. Encheiridium anatomicum et pathologicum. Leiden: Adriaan Wyngaerden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolan, Jean. 1649b. Opuscula anatomica nova, Quae nunc primum in lucem prodeunt. London: Milo Flesher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolan, Jean. 1652. Opuscula anatomica varia ac nova. Paris: Gaspar Meturas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolan, Jean. 1653. Opuscula nova anatomica, Iudicium nouum de Venis Lacteis tam Mesentericis quam Thoracicis, aduersus Th. Bartholinum. Paris: widow of Mathurin du Puis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolan, Jean. 1655. Responsiones Dvae: Prima, Ad Experimenta noua Ioannis Pecqveti… Altera, ad Pecqvetianos duos Doctores Parisienses …. Paris: Gaspar Meturas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolan, Jean. 1657. A Sure Guide or, The Best and Nearest Way to Physick and Chyrurgery. Trans. Nicholas Culpeper. London: Peter Cole. Translation of Encheiridium.

  • Salomon-Bayet, Claire. 1978. L’institution de la science et l’expérience du vivant. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorbière, Samuel. 1648. Discours sceptique Sur le passage du chyle, & sur le mouvement du Cœur. Où sont touchées Quelques difficultés sur les opinions des Veines Lactées, & de la Circulation du Sang. Leiden: Jean Maire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorbière, Samuel. 1658. Praefatio, in qua De vita, et moribvs Petri Gassendi disseritvr. (not paginated). In Pierre Gassendi, Opera omnia in sex tomos divisa, ed. Henri-Louis Habert de Montmor, 6 vols., Vol. 1. Lyon: Laurent Anisson and Jean-Baptiste Devenet.

  • Wear, Andrew. 1983. “William Harvey and the “Way of the Anatomists”. History of Science 21: 223–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitteridge, Gweneth. 1971. William Harvey and the Circulation of the Blood. London: Macdonald.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oregon State University, 306 Milam Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331-5104, USA

    Anita Guerrini

Authors
  1. Anita Guerrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Guerrini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guerrini, A. Experiments, Causation, and the Uses of Vivisection in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century. J Hist Biol 46, 227–254 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-012-9319-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-012-9319-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation