Abstract
In the late 1940s and early 1950s, the leaders of the Genetics Society of America (GSA) struggled to find an appropriate group response to Trofim Lysenko’s scientific claims and the Soviet treatment of geneticists. Although some of the leaders of the GSA favored a swift, critical response, procedural and ideological obstacles prevented them from following this path. Concerned about establishing scientific orthodoxy on one hand and politicizing the content of their science on the other, these American geneticists drew on democratic language and concepts as they engaged in this political issue. The relatively weak statements that did emerge from the GSA attracted little attention in the scientific or popular press. The intensely politicized atmosphere of American science complicated the GSA’s task, as domestic concerns about protecting democracy were beginning to constrain academic freedom. In the context of American Cold War culture, Lysenko became just one example of the dangers the Cold War world presented to scientific freedom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badash, Lawrence. 2001. “Science and McCarthyism.” Minerva 38: 53–80.
Beatty, John. 1994. “Dobzhansky and the Biology of Democracy: The Moral and Political Significance of Genetic Variation.” Mark B. Adams (ed.), The Evolution of Theodosius Dobzhansky: Essays on His Life and Thought in Russia and America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 195–218.
Boyer, Paul. 1994. By the Bomb’s Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Carlson, Elof Axel. 1981. Genes, Radiation and Society: The Life and Work of H.J. Muller. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cook, Robert. 1948. “Neither by Magic nor Gadgets.” Journal of Heredity 39: 360–362.
Cook, Robert. 1949. “Lysenko’s Marxist Genetics: Science or Religion?” Journal of Heredity 40: 169–202.
Cook, Robert. 1952. “Better Late than Never.” Journal of Heredity 42: 190.
deJong-Lambert, William. 2011. “Hermann J. Muller, Theodosius Dobzhansky, Leslie Clarence Dunn and the Reaction to Lysenkoism in the United States,” Journal of Cold War Studies (forthcoming, fall 2011).
deJong-Lambert, William and Krementsov, Nikolai. 2011 “On Labels and Issues: The Lysenko Controversy and the Cold War.” Journal of the History of Biology. doi:10.1007/s10739-011-9292-6
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1946. ““Lysenko’s ‘Genetics’: A Review” of T. D. Lysenko, Heredity and Its Variability, New York: King’s Crown Press, 1945.” Journal of Heredity 37: 5–9.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1949. “The Suppression of a Science.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5: 144–146.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1950. “The Genetic Basis of Evolution.” Scientific American 182: 32–41.
Dunn, L.C. 1949. “Motives for the Purge.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5: 142–143.
Gardner, David. 1967. The California Oath Controversy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Genetics Society of America. 1951. “Report of the Committee of Nine, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting.” Records of the Genetics Society of America 20: 21–22.
Genetics Society of America. 1952. “Proceedings of the Annual Meeting.” Records of the Genetics Society of America 21: 92–96.
Genetics Society of America. 1955. “Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting, Report of the Committee for Public Education and Scientific Freedom.” Records of the Genetics Society of America 24: viii–xii.
Genetics Society of America. 1957. “Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting.” Records of the Genetics Society of America 26: viii–x.
Genetics Society of America. 1959. “Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting.” Records of the Genetics Society of America 28: x.
Glass, Bentley. 1950. “Report of the Committee to Counteract Anti-Genetic Propaganda.” Records of the Genetics Society of America 19: 21–24.
Graham, Loren R. 1987. Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union. New York: Columbia University Press.
Harman, Oren Solomon. 2003. “C.D. Darlington and the British and American Reaction to Lysenko and the Soviet Conception of Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 36: 309–352.
Hollinger, David. 1983. “The Defense of Democracy and Robert K. Merton’s Formulation of the Scientific Ethos.” Knowledge and Society 4: 1–15.
Hylander, Clarence J. 1951. “News and Notes.” Science New Series 114: 473–476.
Irwin, M.R. 1950. “Proceedings of Meetings.” Records of the Genetics Society of America 19: 24.
Joravsky, David. 1970. The Lysenko Affair. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kaiser, David. 2002. “Nuclear Democracy: Political Engagement, Pedagogical Reform, and Particle Physics in Postwar America.” Isis 93: 229–268.
Kevles, Daniel J. 1987. The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Krementsov, Nikolai. 1996. “A ‘Second Front’ in Soviet Genetics: The International Dimension of the Lysenko Controversy, 1944–1947.” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 229–250.
Krementsov, Nikolai. 1997. Stalinist Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Krementsov, Nikolai. 2005. International Science Between the World Wars: The Case of Genetics. New York: Routledge.
Kuznick, Peter J. 1987. Beyond the Laboratory: Scientists as Political Activists in 1930s America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuznick, Peter J. and Gilbert, James (eds.). 2001. Rethinking Cold War Culture. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Lerner, I. Michael. 1953. “The Ninth International Congress of Genetics.” Science New Series 118(3076): 708–709.
Leslie, Stuart W. 1993. The Cold War and American Science: The Military–Industrial–Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lindgren, Carl C. 1950. “Letter to the Editor.” Scientific American 182: 2.
Medvedev, Zhores. 1971. The Rise and Fall of T. D. Lysenko. New York: Anchor Books.
Moore, Kelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists and the Politics of the Military, 1945–1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Needell, Allan A. 2000. Science, Cold War and the American State: Lloyd V. Berkner and the Balance of Professional Ideals. Washington, DC: Harwood Academic Publishers in association with the National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution.
O’Reilly, Kenneth. 1983. Hoover and the Unamericans: The FBI, HUAC, and the Red Menace. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Paul, Diane B. 1983. “A War on Two Fronts: J.B.S. Haldane and the Response to Lysenkoism in Britain.” Journal of the History of Biology 16: 1–37.
Rabinowitch, Eugene. 1949a. “The Purge of Genetics in the Soviet Union.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5: 130.
Rabinowitch, Eugene (ed.). 1949b. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5.
Rabinowitch, Eugene (ed.). 1952. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 8.
Roll-Hansen, Nils. 2005. The Lysenko Effect. The Politics of Science. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
Sapp, Jan. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sax, Karl. 1949. “Genetics and Agriculture.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5: 143–146.
Schrecker, Ellen. 1986. No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schrecker, Ellen. 1998. Many are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. New York: Little, Brown & Company.
Smith, Alice Kimball. 1965. A Peril and a Hope: The Scientists’ Movement in America, 1945–1947. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Theoharis, Athan. 1978. Spying on Americans: Political Surveillance from Hoover to the Huston Plan. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Theoharis, Athan (ed.). 1982. Beyond the Hiss Case: The FBI, Congress, and the Cold War. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Wang, Jessica. 1999. American Science in an Age of Anxiety: Scientists, Anticommunism and the Cold War. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Wang, Zuoyue. 2008. In Sputnik’s Shadow: The President’s Science Advisory Committee and Cold War America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Whitfield, Stephen J. 1991. The Culture of the Cold War. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wright, Sewall. 1949. “Dogma or Opportunism?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5: 141–142.
Wolfe, Audra J. 2010. “What Does It Mean to Go Public? The American Response to Lysenkoism, Reconsidered.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40: 48–78.
Wolfe, Audra J. 2011. “The Cold War Context of the Golden Jubilee, or, Why We Think of Mendel as the Father of Genetics.” Journal of the History of Biology. doi:10.1007/s10739-011-9291-7.
Zachary, G. Pascal. 1997. Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. New York: The Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Selya, R. Defending Scientific Freedom and Democracy: The Genetics Society of America’s Response to Lysenko. J Hist Biol 45, 415–442 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9288-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9288-2