Skip to main content
Log in

Watching the ‘Eugenic Experiment’ Unfold: The Mixed Views of British Eugenicists Toward Nazi Germany in the Early 1930s

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historians of the eugenics movement have long been ambivalent in their examination of the links between British hereditary researchers and Nazi Germany. While there is now a clear consensus that American eugenics provided significant material and ideological support for the Germans, the evidence remains less clear in the British case where comparatively few figures openly supported the Nazi regime and the left-wing critique of eugenics remained particularly strong. After the Second World War British eugenicists had to push back against the accusation that their science was intrinsically dictatorial or totalitarian and, as a result, many of their early perceptions of the Nazis were ignored or rationalised away. Further, historians in recent years have focused more directly on the social reformist elements of eugenics, discussing the links between hereditary science and the birth control and feminist movements in addition to others. While undoubtedly making valuable contributions to the scholarly understanding of the eugenic milieu in the interwar years, these studies have neglected to recontextualize the sentiments of British eugenicists who did indeed view the Nazi government positively in the early years of the 1930s. This article argues that there was a significant, though not numerically sizable, faction in the British eugenics movement, though mostly outside the Eugenics Society itself, in the early 1930s that viewed the Nazi Germany as an admirable state for its implementation of eugenic principles. One of these figures was later interned by his own government for being too closely aligned with the German regime, though he argued that this affinity was driven by the quest for scientific truth rather than politics. Eugenics in Britain thus contained a greater diversity of views toward Germany than scholars have previously assumed, warranting more research into the individuals and organizations harbouring these views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Mark B. 1990. The Wellborn Science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Mark B., Allen, Garland E., and Weiss, Sheila Faith. 2005. “Human Heredity and Politics: A Comparative Institutional Study of the Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor (United States), the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics (Germany), and the Maxim Gorky Medical Genetics Institute (USSR).” Osiris (2nd Series) 20: 232–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1930. “Membership and Organization of the International Federation of Eugenic Organizations.” Eugenical News XV(12): 167–169.

  • Anonymous. 1933–1934. “Notes of the Quarter.” The Eugenics Review XXV: 75–78.

  • Anonymous. 1934–1935. “The German Sterilization Law: Discussion on Professor Muckermann’s Lecture.” The Eugenics Review XXVI: 267–271.

  • Barkan, Elazar. 1992. The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States Between the World Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Edwin. 2003. War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. New York, London: Four Walls Eight Windows.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacker, C.P. 1952. Eugenics: Galton and After. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacker, C.P. and Duff, Ursula Grant. 1953. “Obituary: Mrs. C.B.S. Hodson.” The Eugenics Review 45(2): 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter. 1984. “E. W. MacBride’s Lamarckian Eugenics and Its Implications for the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge.” Annals of Science 41: 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, Clyde. 2007. Eugenics, Race and Intelligence in Education. London: Continuum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, Matthew James. 2008. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge, MA, London: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, John W. 1928. “The Preservation of Native Races.” Journal of Heredity 19(5): 234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowbiggin, Ian Robert. 2008. The Sterilization Movement and Global Fertility in the Twentieth Century. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, Ann. 2008. By Their Fruits: Eugenics, Population Control, and the Abortion Campaign. Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, Raymond. 1929. Primitive Economics of the New Zealand Maori. London: G. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, Francis. 1909. Essays in Eugenics. London: Eugenics Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, Francis. 1914. “Francis Galton’s Utopia: The Eugenic College of Kantsaywhere.” Karl Pearson (ed.), The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, Hans and Lohse, Franz. 1936. Bevölkerungsfragen: Bericht des Internationalen Kongresses für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, Berlin, 26. August-1, September 1935. München: J. F. Lehmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harten, Hans-Christian, Neirich, Uwe, and Schwerendt, Matthias. 2006. Rassenhygiene als Erziehungsideologie des Dritten Reichs: bio-bibliographisches Handbuch. Berlin: Akademie.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Cora B.S. 1934. Human Sterilization Today: A Survey of the Present Position. London: Watts & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Géza von. 1913. Die Rassenhygiene in den Vereinigten Staaten von Nordamerika. München: J. F. Lehmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Aldous. 1969. Brave New World. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Greta. 1980. Social Darwinism and English Thought: The Interaction Between Biological and Social Theory. Brighton/Atlantic Highlands: Harvester Press/Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Greta. 1982. “Eugenics and Social Policy Between the Wars.” The Historical Journal 25(3): 717–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Greta. 1986. Social Hygiene in Twentieth Century Britain. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, Arthur. 1946. Essays on Human Evolution. London: Watts & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, Arthur. 1950. An Autobiography. London: Watts & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, Margaret. 1943. Leonard Darwin, 1850–1943. Cambridge: Privately Printed at the University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Desmond and Hansen, Randall. 1999. “Experts at Work: State Autonomy, Social Learning and Eugenic Sterilization in 1930s Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 29(1): 77–107. doi:10.1017/S0007123499000046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, Stefan. 1994. The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, Stefan. 1997. Die Internationale der Rassisten: Aufstieg und Niedergang der internationalen Bewegung für Eugenik und Rassenhygiene im 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, Harry H. 1934. “Historical Background of the Third International Congress of Eugenics.” Harry F. Perkins, Charles B. Davenport, Clarence G. Campbell, Madison Grant, Harrison R. Hunt, Frederick Osborn, Paul Popenoe, Laurence H. Snyder, and Harry H. Laughlin (eds.), A Decade of Progress in Eugenics: Scientific Papers of the Third International Congress of Eugenics. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnicol, John. 1989. “Eugenics and the Campaign for Voluntary Sterilization in Britain Between the Wars.” Social History of Medicine 2(2): 147–169. doi:10.1093/shm/2.2.147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Hill, Benno. 1988. Murderous Science: Elimination by Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and Others, Germany, 1933–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overy, Richard. 2009. The Morbid Age: Britain Between the Wars. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Karl. 1934. “Prof. Karl Pearson’s Reply.” Speeches Delivered at a Dinner Held in University College, London in Honour of Professor Karl Pearson, 23 April 1934. Cambridge University Press.

  • Pitt-Rivers, George. 1920. The World Significance of the Russian Revolution. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt-Rivers, George Henry Lane Fox. 1927. The Clash of Culture and the Contact of Races. London: George Routledge.

  • Pitt-Rivers, George Henry Lane Fox. 1931. Weeds in the Garden of Marriage. London: N. Douglas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt-Rivers, George Henry Lane Fox. 1971. “Editor’s Preface.” George Henry Lane Fox Pitt-Rivers (ed.), Problems of Population. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 7–9.

  • Porter, Theodore M. 2004. Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton, NJ, Woodstock: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Ninth Conference of the International Federation of Eugenic Organizations. 1930. Ninth Conference of the International Federation of Eugenic Organizations. Farnham, Dorset: I.F.E.O.

  • Ryback, Timothy W. 2010. Hitler’s Private Library: The Books that Shaped his Life. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawday, Jonathan. 1999. “‘New Men, Strange Faces, Other Minds’: Arthur Keith, Race and the Piltdown Affair (1912–53).” Waltraud Ernst and Bernard Harris (eds.), Race, Science and Medicine, 1700–1960. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, Gavin. 2005. “‘Like a Baby with a Box of Matches’: British Scientists and the Concept of ‘Race’ in the Inter-War Period.” The British Journal for the History of Science 38(3): 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, G.R. 1979. “Eugenics and Politics in Britain in the 1930s.” Annals of Science 36(2): 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, G.R. 1981. “Eugenics and Class.” Charles Webster (ed.), Biology, Medicine and Society, 1840–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–242.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Eliot. 1935–1936. “German Eugenics in Practice.” The Eugenics Review XXVII(4): 285–295.

  • Soloway, Richard A. 1990. Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth-Century Britain. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spektorowski, Alberto. 2004. “The Eugenic Temptation in Socialism: Sweden, Germany, and the Soviet Union.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 46(1): 84–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, Jonathan Peter. 2009. Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Dan. 2001. “Race in British Eugenics.” European History Quarterly 31(3): 397–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Dan. 2002. Breeding Superman: Nietzsche, Race and Eugenics in Edwardian and Interwar Britain. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “T.” 1934–1935. “Rüdin, Professor Dr. Ernst: Rassenhygiene im völkischen Staat. Munich, 1934. J.F. Lehmanns Verlag. Pp. 122. Price Mk. 4.” The Eugenics Review XXVI: 233–234.

  • The Times. 1936. “Professor Karl Pearson: Eugenics and Statistics.” 28 April.

  • The Times. 1937. “Obituary: Dr. F. C. S. Schiller: Philosophy and Social Science.” 9 August.

  • Thompson, Norman A. 1933–1934. “Sterilization: Voluntary or Compulsory?” The Eugenics Review XXV(4): 289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Norman A. 1936–1937. “Nordics and Jews.” The Eugenics Review XXVIII(2): 164–165.

  • Thomson, Mathew. 1998. The Problem of Mental Deficiency: Eugenics, Democracy, and Social Policy in Britain c. 1870–1959. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trombley, Stephen. 1988. The Right to Reproduce: A History of Coercive Sterilization. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turda, Marius and Weindling, Paul. 2007. “Blood and Homeland”: Eugenics and Racial Nationalism in Central and Southeast Europe, 1900–1940. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindling, Paul. 1985. “Weimar Eugenics: The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Social Context.” Annals of Science 42(3): 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weindling, Paul. 1989. Health, Race and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism, 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Sheila Faith. 1986. “Wilhelm Schallmayer and the Logic of German Eugenics.” Isis 77(1): 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Sheila Faith. 1987. Race Hygiene and National Efficiency: The Eugenics of Wilhelm Schallmayer. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Sheila Faith. 2005. “‘The Sword of Our Science’ as a Foreign Policy Weapon: The Political Function of German Human Geneticists in the International Arena During the Third Reich.” Ergebnisse, Vorabdrucke aus dem Forschungsprogramm ‘Geschichte der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus’ der Präsidentenkommision der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Berlin.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley W. Hart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hart, B.W. Watching the ‘Eugenic Experiment’ Unfold: The Mixed Views of British Eugenicists Toward Nazi Germany in the Early 1930s. J Hist Biol 45, 33–63 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9259-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9259-z

Keywords

Navigation