Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Plymouth Laboratory and the Institutionalization of Experimental Zoology in Britain in the 1920s

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Plymouth Laboratory of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (1884) was founded in 1888. In addition to conducting morphological and other biological research, the founders of the laboratory aimed at promoting research in experimental zoology which will be used in this paper as a synonym for e.g. experimental embryology, comparative physiology or general physiology. This dream was not fully realized until 1920. The Great War and its immediate aftermath had a positive impact on the development of the Plymouth Laboratory. The war greatly upset the operation of the Zoological Station in Naples and the ensuing crisis in its operations was closely related to the establishment of the physiological department in Plymouth in 1920. Two other key factors in the Plymouth story were the establishment of the Development Fund in 1909, which began contributing funds to the Plymouth Laboratory in 1912, and the patronage of the Cambridge zoologist George P. Bidder (1863–1954). This paper will focus on the combined influence of the Development Fund and Bidder on the development of the Plymouth Laboratory from around 1902 through the early 1920s, and the important role the laboratory played in promoting experimental zoology in Britain in the 1920s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Published Sources

  • Alberti Samuel J.M.M. 2001. Amateurs and Professionals in One County: Biology and Natural History in Late Victorian Yorkshire. Journal of the History of Biology 34: 115–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen Edgar J. 1906. First Report of the Council of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom on Work Carried out in Connection with the International Fishery Investigations. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 7(3): 383–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen Edgar J., H.W. Harvey. 1928. The Laboratory of the Marine Biological Association at Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association 15: 735–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen Garland 1975. Life Sciences in the Twentieth Century. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen Garland 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen Garland 1981. Morphology and Twentieth-Century Biology: A Response. Journal of the History of Biology 14: 159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen Garland 2005. Mechanism, Vitalism and Organicism in Late Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Biology: The Importance of Historical Context. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 261–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth J.H. 1923. Modern Zoology. Science 58: 231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barcroft Joseph, H. Barcroft. 1924. The Blood Pigment of Arenicola. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 96: 28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylay-Balfour Isaac 1894. Presidential Address to the Biology Section, BAAS 1894. Nature 50: 371–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson Keith R. 1981. Problems of Individual Development: Descriptive Embryological Morphology in America at the Turn of the Century. Journal of the History of Biology 14: 115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman F.F., V.H. Blackman, F.W. Oliver, A.G. Tansley, Frederick Keeble. 1917. The Reconstruction of Elementary Botanical Teaching. The New Phytologist 16: 241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman Helen J. 2004. A Spiritual Leader? Cambridge Zoology, Mountaineering and the Death of F.M. Balour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35: 93–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman Helen J. 2007. The Natural Sciences and the Development of Animal Morphology in Late-Victorian Cambridge. Journal of the History of Biology 40: 7–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boney A.D. 1991. The ‹Tansley Manifesto’ Affair. New Phytologist 118: 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess George K. 1920. Governmental Research. Scientific Monthly 11(4): 341–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis John 1999. A History of Britain, 1885–1939. York: St. Martin Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Driesch Hans 1892. Entwicklingsmechanische Studien, I: Der Werth der beiden ersten Furchungzellen in der Ecinodermenentwicklung. Zeitung der Wissenschaft Zoology 53: 160–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlingsson, Steindór J. 2005. The Rise of Experimental Zoology in Britain: Hogben, Huxley, Crew and the Society for Experimental Biology. Unpublished PhD-thesis, University of Manchester

  • Ghiretti Francesco 1985. Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry at the Zoological Station of Naples. Biological Bulletin 168: 122–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray James 1972. George Parker Bidder. In: E.T. Williams, Helen M. Palmer (eds.), Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeben Cristiane 1985. Anton Dohrn – the Statesman of Darwinism. Biological Bulletin 168: 4–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdman William 1895. Presidential Address to Section D, BAAS 1895. Nature 52: 494–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben Lancelot 1925. Studies on the Comparative Physiology of Contractile Tissues, I: The Action of Electrolytes on Invertebrate Muscle. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 15: 263–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben Lancelot 1966. The Origins of the Society. In: M.A. Sleigh, J.F. Sutcliffe (eds.), The Origins and History of the Society for Experimental Biology. London: SEB, pp. 5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben Lancelot 1998. Lancelot Hogben: Scientific Humanist. Suffolk: Merlin Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben Lancelot, A.D. Hobson 1924. Studies on Internal Secretions, III: The Action of Pituitary Extracts and Adrenaline on Contractile Tissue of Certain Invertebrata. British Journal of Experimental Biology 1: 487–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, W.E.S., Hickson, J., Keeble, F.W. and Gamble, F.W. 1900. “Circulatory Apparatus for Keeping Aquatic Organisms Under Definite Physical Conditions.” Report of the Sixty-Ninth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. London: John Murray, p. 431

  • Hull Andrew. 1999. War of Words: The Public Science of the British Scientific Community and the Origins of the Department of Science and Industrial Research. British Journal for the History of Science 15: 461–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • [Huxley, Julian]. 1924. “The Naples Zoological Station.” Nature 113: 449–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Andrew. 2003. “Memories of Bernard Katz.” A Talk Given at University College London, October 8, http://www.physiol.ucl.ac.uk/Bernard_Katz/andrewhuxley.htm (accessed June 28, 2007)

  • Jenkinson Wilfred. 1909. Experimental Embryology. Oxford: The Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, F.W. and Gamble, F.W. 1899a. “On a Circulatory Apparatus for Use in Researches on Colour Physiology and Other Investigations.” Report of the Sixty-Eight Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. London: John Murray, pp. 913–914

  • Keeble F.W., F.W. Gamble. 1899b. The Colour Physiology of Hippolyte varians. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 65: 461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, F.W. and Gamble, F.W. 1902–1903. “The Colour Physiology of Higher Crustacea.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 71: 69–71

  • Keeble F.W., F.W. Gamble. 1904. The Colour Physiology of Higher Crustacea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 196: 295–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeble F.W., F.W. Gamble. 1905. The Colour Physiology of Higher Crustacea, Part III. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 76: 198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeble F.W., F.W. Gamble. 1906. The Colour-Physiology of the Higher Crustacea, Part IV. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 198: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft Alison. 2004. Pragmatism, Patronage and Politics in English Biology: The Rise and Fall of Economic Biology 1904–1920. Journal of the History of Biology, 37: 213–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft Alison, Samuel J.M.M. Alberti. 2003. ‹Equal Though Different’: Laboratories, Museums and the Institutional Development of Biology in Late-Victorian Northern England. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 34: 203–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler Robert E. 2002. Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein Jane. 1981. Shifting Assumptions in American Biology: Embryology, 1890–1910. Journal of the History of Biology 14: 89–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein Jane 1985, First Impressions: American Biologists at Naples. Biological Bulletin 168: 187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein Jane 1991. Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915. New York: Johns Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein Jane, Ronald Rainger, Keith R. Benson 1981. Introduction: Were American Morphologists in Revolt? Journal of the History of Biology 14: 83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall Francis 1909. The Experimental Method in Zoological Research: A Review of Experimental Zoology; Part 1, Embryogeny, by Hans Przibram. Nature 80: 2–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mines, George R. 1910–1913. “The Relation of the Heart-Beat to Electrolytes and Its Bearing on Comparative Physiology.” Journal of the Marine Biological Association 9: 171–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Mines George R 1912. On the Relations to Electrolytes of the Hearts of Different Species of Animals, I: Elasmobranchs and Pecten. Journal of Physiology 43: 467–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Mines George R. 1913. On Dynamic Equilibrium of the Heart. Journal of Physiology 46: 349–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroy Alberto, Cristiane Groeben 1985. The ‹New’ Embryology at the Zoological Station and the Marine Biological Laboratory. Biological Bulletin 168: 35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NN. 1887. The History of the Foundation of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Journal of the Marine Biological Association 1(1): 17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NN. 1904–1906. “Report of the Council, 1905–06.” Journal of the Marine Biological Association 7: 415–33

    Google Scholar 

  • NN. 1912. Scientific News and Event. Science 36: 211

    Google Scholar 

  • NN. 1910–1913a. “Report of the Council, 1910–11.” Journal of the Marine Biological Association 9: 248–271

    Google Scholar 

  • NN. 1910–1913b. “Report of the Council, 1911–12.” Journal of the Marine Biological Association 9: 578–595

    Google Scholar 

  • NN. 1913–1915. “Report of the Council, 1912.” Journal of the Marine Biological Association 10: 123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • NN. 1928. List of Publications Recording the Results of Researches Carried Out Under the Auspices of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom in Their Laboratory at Plymouth or on the North Sea Coast from 1886–1927. Journal of the Marine Biological Association 15: 753–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyhart Lynn K. 1996. Natural History and the ‹New’ Biology. In: N. Jardine, J.A. Secord, E.C. Spary (eds.), Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 426–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby Robert 1991. Social Imperialism and State Support for Agricultural-Research in Edwardian Britain. Annals of Science 48: 509–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly Philip 1984. The Appearance of Academic Biology in Late Nineteenth-Century America. Journal of the History of Biology 17: 369–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly Philip 1987. Controlling Life: Jacques Lob and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly Philip 1988. Summer Resort and Scientific Discipline: Woods Hole and the Structure of American Biology, 1882–1925. In: Ronald Rainger, Keith R. Benson, Jane Maienschein (eds.), The American Development of Biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp 121–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly Philip 2000. Biologists and the Promise of American Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainger Ronald 1981. The Continuation of the Morphological Tradition: American Palaeontology, 1880–1910. Journal of the History of Biology 14: 129–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainger Ronald, Keith R. Benson, Jane Maienschein (eds.), 1988. The American Development of Biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M. 1985. Embryology and Classical Zoology in Great Britain. In: T.J. Horder, J.A. Witkowski (eds.), History of Embryology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, Wilhelm 1888. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsmechanik des Embryo. Wirchows Archiv 114: 113–153, 289–291

  • Sakar Sahotra 1996. Lancelot Hogben, 1895–1975. Genetics 142: 655–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer E.A. Sharpey 1894. Presidential Address to the Physiological Section, BAAS 1894. Nature 50: 401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Southward A.J., E.K. Roberts 1987. One Hundred Years of Marine Research at Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association 67: 465–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery, James. (Forthcoming). “R.A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype–Environment Interaction.” Journal of the History of Biology

  • Thiselton-Dyer L. 1895. Presidential Address to the Botanical Section, BAAS 1895. Nature 52: 526–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, Bernard. 1987. The New Botany in Britain Circa 1870 to Circa 1914. Unpublished PhD-thesis, University of Manchester

  • Wells George P. 1976. The early days of the S. E. B. In: P.S. Davis (eds.), Perspectives in Experimental Biology, Vol. 1. London: Pergamon, pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson Edmund 1924. Reorganization of the Naples Zoological Station. Science 59: 182–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski J.A. 1992. Julian Huxley in the Laboratory: Embracing Inquisitiveness and Widespread Curiosity. In: Kenneth Waters, Albert van Helden (eds.), Julian Huxley: Biologist and Statesman of Science. Huston: Rice University Press, pp. 79–103

    Google Scholar 

Unpublished Sources

  • Archive of the Marine Biological Association, the National Marine Biological Library Plymouth, UK.

  • G. P. Bidder’s Papers, PBD2(2)

  • Sidney Harmer to G.P Bidder

  • G. P. Bidder’s Papers, PBD4(3)

  • E. J. Allen to G. P. Bidder

  • G. P. Bidder’s Papers, PBD4(4)

  • E. J. Allen to G. P. Bidder

  • G. P. Bidder’s Papers, PBD7(1)

  • “The Ray Lankester Fund”

  • Evans to G. P. Bidder

  • E. J. Allen to G. P. Bidder

  • G. P. Bidder to Ray Lankester

  • G. P. Bidder to J. A. Travis

  • J. A. Travers to G. P. Bidder

  • Stanley Gardiner to G. P. Bidder

  • G. P. Bidder’s Papers, PBD8

  • “Circulars to promote the new Physiology Laboratory”

  • G. P. Bidder’s Papers, PBD9

  • “Application to the Development Fund”

  • E. T. Browne to G. P Bidder

  • Frederick Gamble to G.P Bidder

  • E.J. Allen to G.P Bidder

  • G. P. Bidder’s Papers, PBD13

  • G. P. Bidder to Lancelot Hogben

  • Lancelot Hogben to G.P. Bidder

  • Director’s Office, MC1.1

  • MBA Council Minute Book 1907–1914

  • MBA Council Minute Book 1915–1924

  • Director’s Office, Ray Lankester Fund Correspondence and Accounts, MD7

  • E. J. Allen to G. P. Bidder

  • G.P. Bidder to E.J. Allen

  • E. J. Allen to Lancelot Hogben

  • Lancelot Hogben to E. J. Allen

  • F.S. Russell’s papers, PRU16

  • G.P. Bidder to James Gray

  • A . Hardy’s Papers, Special Collections and Western Manuscripts, Oxford University, UK.

  • Julian Huxley to Alister Hardy

  • Julian S. Huxley Papers, Woodson Research Center, Fondren Library, Rice University (JHP RU), Texas, USA.

  • G. P. Bidder to J. Huxley

  • E. J. Allen to J. Huxley

  • Lancelot Hogben to J. Huxley

  • Reinhardt Dohrn to J. Huxley

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Jonathan Harwood, Joe Cain, Þorsteinn Vilhjálmsson and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper, and Hope Knútsson for her assistance. I also thank the National Marine Biological Library, Plymouth, UK, the Woodson Research Center, Fondren Library, Rice University, Texas, USA, and Special Collections and Western Manuscripts, Oxford University, UK for permit to use their archival material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Svarthamrar 9, 112, Reykjavik, Iceland

    Steindór J. Erlingsson

Authors
  1. Steindór J. Erlingsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steindór J. Erlingsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erlingsson, S.J. The Plymouth Laboratory and the Institutionalization of Experimental Zoology in Britain in the 1920s. J Hist Biol 42, 151–183 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-008-9157-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-008-9157-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation