Skip to main content
Log in

Commercialization decisions and the economics of introduction

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A commercial horticultural industry that establishes plant-breeding nurseries for an exotic species throughout a regional economy will expand until the marginal profit of the last nursery established is zero. However, a regional government concerned with social welfare will take into account not only the profits of the horticultural industry but also any expected costs of an accidental invasion. The latter costs will consist of the discounted expected social damages due to an increase in the rate of invasion over time and the increase in expected damage cost per hectare caused by an additional nursery. A government can employ an “introducers' pay” tax equal to the latter social costs to ensure that the plant breeding industry establishes the optimal number of nurseries. We illustrate this outcome with the example of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America. In the absence of any tax, the horticultural industry will establish n = 3528 nursery operations, and the expected damages from invasion are US$ 28.2 million per year. With the tax, only n = 300 nurseries are established but the expected damages from invasion are reduced to US$ 1.3 million per year. Although profits for the horticultural industry are lower from the tax, the net gains in overall social welfare more than offset the losses. Although these results are illustrative only, they show that the problem of plant invasives initiated by commercial operations is amenable to standard economic analysis and solutions, such as implementation of an “introducers' pay tax”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N.O., 2004. Invasive Horticultural Crops (Part 3): Who's monitoring & controlling them? Minnesota Nursery and Landscape Association, MNLA News 28(6): 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N.O. & P.D. Ascher, 1993. Male and female fertility of loosestrife (Lythrum) cultivars. J Am Soc Hort Sci 118(6): 851–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATTRA, 1996. Purple loosestrife: Public enemy on federal lands. ATTRA Interior Helper 1(2): 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E.B., 2001. A note on the economics of biological invasions. Ecol Econ 39(2): 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D., 1997. Introduction of non-native species: Ecology and economics. In: O.T. Sandlund & A. Viken (Eds.), Report of the Workshop on Freshwater Biodiversity. Directorate for Nature Management/Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Selbu, Norway, June 5–7.

  • Cropper, M., 1976. Regulating activities with catastrophic environmental effects. J Environ Econ Manage 3: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalsimer, A.A., 2000. Predicting the spread of non-indigenous invasive plant species: Can it be done? Georgetown Public Policy Institute (Thesis). Available athttp://www.denix.osd.mil /denix/public/news/osd/niwaw/invasive-thesis/weedstock.html.

  • Hager, H.A. & K.D. McCoy, 1998. The implications of accepting untested hypotheses: A review of the effects of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America. Biodiv Conserv 7: 1069–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, E., M. Spence & R. Zeckhauser, 1972. The optimal control of pollution. J Econ Theory 4: 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowler, D. & E. Barbier, 2000. The economics of an invading species: A theoretical model and case study application. In: C. Perrings, M. Williamson & S. Dalmazzone (Eds.), The Economics of Biological Invasions. Cheltenham, UK.

  • Kolar, C.S. & D.M. Lodge, 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298(8): 1233–1236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R.L., 2000. The economics of alien species invasions. In: H. Mooney & R. Hobbs (Eds.), Invasive Species in a Changing World, pp. 241–259. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTA, 1993. Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA-F-565. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC. Available athttp://www.wwe.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.pr1/ ∼ota/disk1/1993/9325/9325.pdf.

  • Perrings, C., M. Williamson, E. Barbier, D. Delfino, S. Dalmazzone, J. Shogren, P. Simmons, & A.Watkinson, 2002. Biological invasion risks and the public good: An economic perspective. Conserv Ecol 6(1): 1. Available athttp://www.consecol.org/vol6 /iss1/art1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimental, D., L. Lach, R. Zuniga, & D. Morrison, 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50(1): 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pursh, F., 1814. Flora Americae Septentrionalis; or, A systematic arrangement and description of the plants of North America. White, Cochran & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W.J. & H.E. Heras, 1992. The conservation and exploitation of vulnerable resources. Bull Math Biol 54(2/3): 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, S.H. & C.W. Hamilton, 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11(1): 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sain, G.E. & H.J. Barreto, 1996. The adoption of soil conservation technology in El Salvador: Linking productivity and conservation. J Soil Water Conserv 51(4): 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada, N. & K. Kawasaki, 1997. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.S., W.M. Lonsdale & J. Fortune, 1999. When to ignore advice: Invasion predictions and decision theory. Biol Invasions 1: 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.Q., R.L. Stuckey & E.B. Thompson, 1987. Spread, impact, and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America Wetlands. Fish and Wildlife Research 2. US Dept of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

  • Tsur, Y. & A. Zemel, 1994. Endangered species and natural resource exploitation: Extinction vs. coexistence. Nat Resour Model 8(4): 389–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA, 2001. 1998 Census of Horticultural Specialties. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available athttp://www. nass.usda.gov/census/census97/horticulture/horticulture.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H., 1984. Microeconomic Analysis, 2nd ed. W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, M., 1996. Biological Invasions. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Barbier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbier, E., Knowler, D. Commercialization decisions and the economics of introduction. Euphytica 148, 151–164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-5949-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-5949-1

Key Words

Navigation