Abstract
Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is an most important mechanism responsible for the relatively constant blood flow supply to brain when cerebral perfusion pressure varies. Its assessment in nonacute cases has been relied on the quantification of the relationship between noninvasive beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) and blood flow velocity (BFV). To overcome the nonstationary nature of physiological signals such as BP and BFV, a computational method called multimodal pressure-flow (MMPF) analysis was recently developed to study the nonlinear BP–BFV relationship during the Valsalva maneuver (VM). The present study aimed to determine (i) whether this method can estimate autoregulation from spontaneous BP and BFV fluctuations during baseline rest conditions; (ii) whether there is any difference between the MMPF measures of autoregulation based on intra-arterial BP (ABP) and based on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP); and (iii) whether the MMPF method provides reproducible and reliable measure for noninvasive assessment of autoregulation. To achieve these aims, we analyzed data from existing databases including: (i) ABP and BFV of 12 healthy control, 10 hypertensive, and 10 stroke subjects during baseline resting conditions and during the Valsalva maneuver, and (ii) ABP, CPP, and BFV of 30 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who were being paralyzed, sedated, and ventilated. We showed that autoregulation in healthy control subjects can be characterized by specific phase shifts between BP and BFV oscillations during the Valsalva maneuver, and the BP–BFV phase shifts were reduced in hypertensive and stroke subjects (P < 0.01), indicating impaired autoregulation. Similar results were found during baseline condition from spontaneous BP and BFV oscillations. The BP–BFV phase shifts obtained during baseline and during VM were highly correlated (R > 0.8, P < 0.0001), showing no statistical difference (paired-t test P > 0.47). In TBI patients there were strong correlations between phases of ABP and CPP oscillations (R = 0.99, P < 0.0001) and, thus, between ABP–BFV and CPP–BFV phase shifts (P < 0.0001, R = 0.76). By repeating the MMPF 4 times on data of TBI subjects, each time on a selected cycle of spontaneous BP and BFV oscillations, we showed that MMPF had better reproducibility than traditional autoregulation index. These results indicate that the MMPF method, based on instantaneous phase relationships between cerebral blood flow velocity and peripheral blood pressure, has better performance than the traditional standard method, and can reliably assess cerebral autoregulation dynamics from ambulatory blood pressure and cerebral blood flow during supine rest conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BP:
-
Blood pressure
- ABP:
-
Intra-arterial blood pressure
- CPP:
-
Cerebral perfusion pressure
- ICP:
-
Intracranial pressure
- BFV:
-
Blood flow velocity
- BI:
-
Brain injury
- ARI:
-
Autoregulation index
- MMPF:
-
Multimodal pressure-flow
- EMD:
-
Empirical mode decomposition
- EEMD:
-
Ensemble empirical mode decomposition
- VM:
-
Valsalva maneuver
- HTN:
-
Hypertensive
References
Aaslid R. Cerebral Hemodynamics. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R, editors. Transcranial doppler. New York: Raven Press; 1992. p. 49–55.
Altman DG. Practical statistics in medical research. In: Altman DG, editor. Practical statistics in medical research. London: Chapman Hall; 1991.
Bland JM, Altam DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.
Carey BJ, Panerai RB, Potter JF. Effect of aging on dynamic cerebral autoregulation during head-up tilt. Stroke 2003;34:1871–5.
Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD. Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery 1997;41:11–7; discussion 17–9.
Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients. Stroke 1996;27:1829–34.
Dawson SL, Panerai RB, Potter JF. Critical closing pressure explains cerebral hemodynamics during the Valsalva maneuver. J Appl Physiol 1999;86:675–80.
Diehl RR, Linden D, Lucke D, Berlit P. Phase relationship between cerebral blood fow velocity and blood pressure. A clinical test of autoregulation. Stroke1995;26:1801–4.
Diehl RR, Linden D, Lucke D, Berlit P. Spontaneous blood pressure oscillations and cerebral autoregulation. Clin Auton Res 1998;8:7–12.
Eames PJ, Blake MJ, Dawson SL, Panerai RB, Potter J. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation and beat-to-beat blood pressure control are impaired in acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:467–73.
Giller CA. The frequency-dependent behavior of cerebral autoregulation. Neurosurgery 1990;27:362–8.
Giller CA, Iacopino DG. Use of middle cerebral velocity and blood pressure for the analysis of cerebral autoregulation at various frequencies: the coherence index. Neurolog Res 1997;19:634–40.
Hamner JW, Cohen MA, Mukai S, Lipsitz LA, Taylor JA. Spectral indices of human cerebral blood flow control: responses to augmented blood pressure oscillations. J Physiol 2004;559:965–73.
Hu K, Peng CK, Huang N, Wu Z, Lipsitz LA, Novak V. Assessment of impaired cerebral blood flow regulation in type 2 diabetes mellitus using multimodal pressure flow analysis. Diabetes 2007a;56(Suppl. 1):A285 (Ref Type: Abstract).
Hu K, Peng CK, Huang NE, Wu Z, Lipsitz LA, Cavallerano J, Novak V. Altered phase interactions between spontaneous blood pressure and flow fluctuations in type 2 diabetes mellitus: nonlinear assessment of cerebral autoregulation. Physica A 2007b;S0378-4371(07)01260-5 (in press).
Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih EH, Zheng Q, Tung CC, Liu HH. The empirical mode decomposition method and the Hilbert spectrum for non-stationary time series analysis. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 1998a;454:903–95.
Huang W, Shen Z, Huang NE, Fung YC. Engineering analysis of biological variables: an example of blood pressure over 1 day. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998b;95:4816–21.
Immink RV, van Montfans GA, Stam J, Karemaker JM, Diamant M, van Lieshout JJ. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in acute lacunar and middle cerebral artery territory ischemic stroke. Stroke 2005;36:2595–600.
Lipsitz LA, Mukai S, Hammer J, Gagnon M, Babikian VL. Dynamic regulation of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity in aging and hypertension. Stroke 2000;31:1897–903.
Mitsis GD, Poulin MJ, Robbins PA, Marmarelis VZ. Nonlinear modeling of the dynamic effects of arterial pressure and CO2 variations on cerebral blood flow in healthy humans. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51:1932–43.
Novak V, Chowdhary A, Farrar B, Nagaraja H, Braun J, Kanard R, Novak P, Slivka A. Altered cerebral vasoregulation in hypertension and stroke. Neurology 2003;60:1657–63.
Novak V, Novak P, Schondorf R. Accuracy of beat-to-beat noninvasive measurement of finger arterial pressure using the Finapres: a spectral analysis approach. J Clin Monit 1994;10:118–26.
Novak V, Spies JM, Novak P, McPhee BR, Rummans TA, Low PA. Hypocapnia and cerebral hypoperfusion in orthostatic intolerance. Stroke 1998;29:1876–81.
Novak V, Yang ACC, Lepicovsky L, Goldbeger AL, Lipsitz LA, Peng CK. Multimodal pressure-flow method to assess dynamics of cerebral autoregulation in stroke and hypertension. BioMed Eng OnLine 2004;3:39.
Olufsen MS, Nadim A, Lipsitz LA. Dynamics of cerebral blood flow regulation explained using a lumped parameter model. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2002;282:R611–22.
Omboni S, Parati G, Frattola A, Mutti E, Di Rienzo M, Castiglioni P, Mancia G. Spectral and sequence analysis of finger blood pressure variability. Comparison with analysis of intra-arterial recordings. Hypertension 1993;22:26–33.
Panerai RB. Assessment of cerebral pressure autoregulation in humans—a review of measurement methods. Physiol Meas 1998;19:305–3008.
Panerai RB, Dawson SL, Eames PJ, Potter JF. Cerebral blood flow velocity response to induced and spontaneous sudden changes in arterial blood pressure. Am J Physiol 2001;280:H2162–74.
Panerai RB, Eames PJ, Potter JF. Multiple coherence of cerebral blood flow velocity in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;291:H251–9.
Pinna GD, Maestri R, Mortara A. Estimation of arterial blood pressure variability by spectral analysis: comparison between Finapres and invasive measurements. Physiol Meas 1996;17:147–69.
Schmidt EA, Czosnyka M, Steiner LA, Balestreri M, Smielewski P, Piechnik SK, Matta BF, Pickard JD. Asymmetry of pressure autoregulation after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2003;99:991–8.
Tiecks FP, Lam AM, Aaslid R, Newell DW. Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements. Stroke 1999;26:1014–9.
Tiecks FP, Lam AM, Matta BF, Strebel S, Douville C, Newell DW. Effects of the Valsalva maneuver on cerebral circulation in healthy adults. A transcranial doppler study. Stroke 1995;26:1386–92.
Wu Z, Huang NE. Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Centre for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies, Tech Rep No 193 2005.
Zhang R, Zuckerman JH, Giller CA, Levine BD. Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans. Am J Physiol 1998;274:H233–41.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the American Diabetes Association Grant 1-03-CR-23 to V. Novak; NIH Program projects AG004390 and NIH-NINDS R01-NS045745; NIH-NINDS STTR grant 1R41NS053128-01A2 in collaboration with DynaDx, Inc; NIH Older American Independence Center Grant 2P60 AG08812; James S. McDonnell Foundation via award to CK Peng; the Ellison Medical Foundation Senior Scholar in Aging Award; the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; the NIH/National Center for Research Resources (P41RR013622); and Medical Research Council via Program Grant NO. MRC G9439390 to M Czosnyka.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
ICMplus (www.neurosurg.cam.ac.uk/icmplus)software is licensed by University of Cambridge, UK, and M.C. has a financial interest in a part of licensing fee.
Appendix
Appendix
Signal Decomposition
The main concept of the MMPF method is to probe nonlinear BP–BFV relationship by concentrating on intrinsic components of BP and BFV signals that have simplified temporal structures but still can reflect nonlinear interactions between two physiological variables. The first step of the MMPF is to decompose each signal into multiple intrinsic mode functions (IMFs), each mode representing the frequency-amplitude modulation at a specific time scale corresponding to different physiologic influences. To achieve this, the original MMPF used the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method (Huang et al. 1998a). For a time series x(t) with at least 2 extremes, the EMD applies a sifting procedure to extract IMFs one by one from a smallest time scale to the largest time scale
where s k (t) is the kth IMF and \( r_{k} (t) = x(t) - {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^k {s_{i} (t)} } \) is the residual after extracting the first k IMF. There are six steps in the extraction of the kth IMF:
-
(i)
Initialize \( h_{0} (t) = h_{{i - 1}} (t) = r_{{k - 1}} (t) \) (if k = 1, h0(t) = x(t)), where i = 1;
-
(ii)
Extract local minima/maxima of h i−1(t) (if the total number of minima and maxima is less than 2, \( s_{k} (t) = h_{{i - 1}} (t) \) and stop the whole EMD process);
-
(iii)
Obtain upper envelope (from maxima) and lower envelope (from minima) functions p(t) and v(t) using cubic spline fittings to interpolate local minima and maxima of h i−1(t), respectively;
-
(iv)
Calculate the \( h_{i} (t) = h_{{i - 1}} (t) - (p(t) + v(t))/2; \)
-
(v)
Calculate the standard deviation (SD) of (p(t) + v(t))/2;
-
(vi)
If SD is small enough (less than a chosen threshold SDmax, typically between 0.2 and 0.3) (Huang et al. 1998b), the kth IMF is assigned as \( s_{k} (t) = h_{i} (t) \) and \( r_{k} (t) = r_{{k - 1}} (t) - s_{k} (t); \)Otherwise repeat steps (ii) to (v) for i + 1 until SD < SDmax
The above procedure is repeated to for k + 1 to obtain different IMFs at different scales until there are less than 2 minima or maxima in a residual r k (t) which will be assigned as the last IMF (see the step ii above).
The EMD can extract the true oscillation components embedded in the original signal without presuming oscillation frequency. However, for nonstationary signals with intermittent oscillations, a limitation of EMD can be caused by the “mode mixing” problem, i.e., a mode obtained from EMD could comprise of oscillations with different wavelengths (corresponding to different physiological functions) at various temporal locations or oscillations corresponding to a physiological function appear in different modes at different temporal locations (Huang et al. 1998a). In order to reliably extract the spontaneous oscillations in BP and BFV during baseline conditions, the improved MMPF method uses a noise-assisted EMD algorithm, namely the Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) (Wu and Huang 2005). The EEMD consists of an ensemble of the EMD decompositions of data with added white noise and treats the resultant means of the corresponding intrinsic mode functions from different decompositions as the final result. Shortly, for a time series x(t), the EEMD includes the following steps:
-
(i)
Generate a new signal y(t) from the original time series x(t) by superposing to x(t) a white noise with amplitude equal to 10% of the standard deviation of x(t) (applying noise with larger amplitude requires more realizations of decompositions);
-
(ii)
Perform the EMD on y(t) to obtain intrinsic mode functions;
-
(iii)
Repeat steps (i)–(ii) m times with different white noise to obtain an ensemble of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) \( \{ s^{1}_{k} (t),k = 1,2...,n\} ,\;\{ s^{2}_{k} (t),k = 1,2...,n\} , \ldots ,\{ s^{m}_{k} (t),k = 1,2...,n\} ; \)
-
(iv)
Calculate the average of intrinsic mode functions \( {\left\{ {s_{k} (t),k = 1,2...,n} \right\}}, \) where
$$ s^{{}}_{k} (t) = \frac{1} {m}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {s^{i}_{k} (t)} }. $$
The last two steps are applied to reduce noise level and to ensure that the obtained IMFs reflect the true oscillations in the original time series x(t). In this study, we repeated decomposition m = 100 times so that the final noise level is approximately less than 1% (=amplitude of white noise/\( {\sqrt m } \)).
The EEMD approach overcomes the mode-mixing problem and ensures the decompositions to compass the range of possible solutions in the sifting process and to collate the signals of different scale in the proper IMF naturally.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, K., Peng, C.K., Czosnyka, M. et al. Nonlinear Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation from Spontaneous Blood Pressure and Cerebral Blood Flow Fluctuations. Cardiovasc Eng 8, 60–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-007-9045-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-007-9045-5