Skip to main content
Log in

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial and cervical cancers using freehand SPECT—first experiences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gynecological Surgery

Abstract

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) is currently being developed for uterine cancers. The uterus is not easily accessible for tracer application; furthermore, the lymphatic drainage of the uterus is complex, which makes laparoscopic localization of the SLN challenging. The freehand single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a 3D laparoscopic imaging modality which has been developed to overcome these problems. The aim of the study was to evaluate the freehand SPECT to detect the SLN in patients with uterine cancers. Twenty-nine patients with endometrial or cervical cancers were included into the LAPSENT study. Freehand SPECT was utilized to detect the SLN and guide its resection following intracervical injection of the tracer in patients with cervical cancer or hysteroscopy-guided injection of the tracer in patients with endometrial cancers. SLNs were detected in 18 of 24 patients with endometrial cancer and in 5 of 5 patients with cervical cancer. An average of 1.1 SLNs was detected in patients with endometrial cancers and 2 SLNs in patients with cervical cancers. The SLN was located in the pelvic lymphatic basin in 16 patients (12 unilateral and 4 bilateral). Three patients had paraaortic SLNs. Only one metastasis was found in any of the SLNs removed (endometrial cancer case) resulting in an upstaging. We demonstrated that SLNB in endometrial and cervical cancers using the freehand SPECT is feasible and that hysteroscopy-guided injection of the tracer is reasonable in endometrial cancers. Combining both techniques single-anesthesia SLNB of endometrial cancer is feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, Parmar MK (2009) Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet 373(9658):125–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levenback CF (2008) Status of sentinel lymph node biopsy in gynecological cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 15(1):18–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wendler T, Herrmann K, Schnelzer A, et al. (2010) First demonstration of 3-D lymphatic mapping in breast cancer using freehand SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(8):1452–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freesmeyer M, Winkens T, Opfermann T, Elsner P, Runnebaum I, Darr A (2014) Real-time ultrasound and freehand-SPECT. Experiences with sentinel lymph node mapping. Nuklearmedizin Nucl Med 53(6):259–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillard C, Franken P, Darcourt J, Barranger E (2015) Freehand SPECT for navigation and sentinel node detection in breast cancer. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 43(2):172–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pouw B, der Veen LJ, Hellingman D, et al. (2014) Feasibility of preoperative (125)I seed-guided tumoural tracer injection using freehand SPECT for sentinel lymph node mapping in non-palpable breast cancer. EJNMMI Res 4:19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al. (2008) Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(23):1707–1716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Takeda M, Sakuragi N (2010) Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet 375(9721):1165–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. AlHilli MM, Podratz KC, Dowdy SC, et al. (2013) Risk-scoring system for the individualized prediction of lymphatic dissemination in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 131(1):103–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Torne A, Pahisa J, Vidal-Sicart S, et al. (2013) Transvaginal ultrasound-guided myometrial injection of radiotracer (TUMIR): a new method for sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 128(1):88–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke TW, Levenback C, Tornos C, Morris M, Wharton JT, Gershenson DM (1996) Intraabdominal lymphatic mapping to direct selective pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: results of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 62(2):169–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frumovitz M, Bodurka DC, Broaddus RR, et al. (2007) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 104(1):100–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kadkhodayan S, Shiravani Z, Hasanzadeh M, et al. (2014) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer—a feasibility study using cervical injection of radiotracer and blue dye. Nuclear medicine review. Cent East Eur 17(2):55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopez-Dela Manzanara Cano C, Cordero Garcia JM, Martin-Francisco C, Pascual-Ramirez J, Parra CP, Cespedes CC (2014) Sentinel lymph node detection using 99mTc combined with methylene blue cervical injection for endometrial cancer surgical management: a prospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer: Off J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc 24(6):1048–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mucke J, Klapdor R, Schneider M, et al. (2014) Isthmocervical labelling and SPECT/CT for optimized sentinel detection in endometrial cancer: technique, experience and results. Gynecol Oncol 134(2):287–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bats AS, Clement D, Larousserie F, et al. (2008) Does sentinel node biopsy improve the management of endometrial cancer? Data from 43 patients. J Surg Oncol 97(2):141–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Niikura H, Kaiho-Sakuma M, Tokunaga H, et al. (2013) Tracer injection sites and combinations for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 131(2):299–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rossi EC, Jackson A, Ivanova A, Boggess JF (2013) Detection of sentinel nodes for endometrial cancer with robotic assisted fluorescence imaging: cervical versus hysteroscopic injection. Int J Gynecol Cancer: Off J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc 23(9):1704–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Holloway RW, Bravo RA, Rakowski JA, et al. (2012) Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging: a comparison of colorimetric and fluorescence imaging. Gynecol Oncol 126(1):25–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sinno AK, Fader AN, Roche KL, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Tanner EJ (2014) A comparison of colorimetric versus fluorometric sentinel lymph node mapping during robotic surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 134(2):281–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Papadia A, Imboden S, Siegenthaler F, et al (2016) Laparoscopic indocyanine green sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23(7):2206–2211

  22. Plante M, Touhami O, Trinh XB, et al. (2015) Sentinel node mapping with indocyanine green and endoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging in endometrial cancer. A pilot study and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 137(3):443–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossi EC, Ivanova A, Boggess JF (2012) Robotically assisted fluorescence-guided lymph node mapping with ICG for gynecologic malignancies: a feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol 124(1):78–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alkureishi LW, Burak Z, Alvarez JA, et al. (2009) Joint practice guidelines for radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node localization in oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 16(11):3190–3210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Balch CM, Morton DL, Gershenwald JE, et al. (2009) Sentinel node biopsy and standard of care for melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 60(5):872–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ansari M, Rad MA, Hassanzadeh M, et al. (2013) Sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 34(5):387–401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to René Hornung.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study has no special funding.

Conflict of interest

Thomas Wendler has a minor share (<5 %) of SurgicEye GmbH. The other authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Markus, A., Ray, A.S.C., Bolla, D. et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial and cervical cancers using freehand SPECT—first experiences. Gynecol Surg 13, 499–506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-016-0969-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-016-0969-x

Keywords

Navigation