Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of corneal irregular astigmatism on visual acuity after conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare short-term outcomes of Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using a graft prepared with either a femtosecond laser or a microkeratome.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients underwent DSAEK with grafts prepared with either a femtosecond laser (f-DSAEK; 21 eyes) or a microkeratome (m-DSAEK; 17 eyes). Visual acuity, endothelial cell density, regular astigmatism and irregular astigmatism were compared between the two groups preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively. Fourier analysis was conducted to calculate astigmatism of the anterior and posterior surfaces, and total cornea, using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

Results

Visual acuity (logMAR) improved from 1.20 ± 0.60 to 0.43 ± 0.25 after m-DSAEK (P < 0.001) and from 1.20 ± 0.57 to 0.77 ± 0.33 after f-DSAEK (P = 0.0028) at 6 months following DSAEK. Visual acuity after m-DSAEK was significantly better than after f-DSAEK at 1, 3, and 6 months (P < 0.05). AS-OCT corneal images revealed greater irregularities on the posterior surfaces of f-DSAEK grafts compared to m-DSAEK grafts. Irregular astigmatism of the total cornea and the posterior surface was significantly larger after f-DSAEK than after m-DSAEK, although there was no significant difference in irregular astigmatism of the anterior surface at 6 months. Postoperative visual acuity was significantly correlated with the postoperative irregular astigmatism of the total cornea (r = 0.6657 and P < 0.001) and the anterior (r = 0.416, P = 0.016) and posterior surfaces (r = 0.7046, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Visual outcomes after f-DSAEK were poor compared to conventional m-DSAEK due to an increase in irregular astigmatism caused by posterior surface irregularities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Price FW Jr., Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:339–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006;25:886–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ Jr., Meisler DM. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density 6 months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea. 2007;26:670–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Price MO, Gorovoy M, Price FW Jr., Benetz BA, Menegay HJ, Lass JH. Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: three-year graft and endothelial cell survival compared to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:246–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li JY, Terry MA, Goshe J, Shamie N, Davis-Boozer D. Graft rejection after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:90–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamaguchi T, Negishi K, Yamaguchi K, Dogru M, Uchino Y, Shimmura S, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior corneal surface irregularity in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2010;29:1086–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel SV, Baratz KH, Hodge DO, Maquire LJ, McLaren JW. The effect of corneal light scatter on vision after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:153–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Epstein D, Kruse FE. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:528–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamaguchi T, Negishi K, Yamaguchi K, Murat D, Uchino Y, Shimmura S, et al. Effect of anterior and posterior corneal surface irregularity on vision after Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:688–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Muftuoglu O, Prasher P, Bowman RW, McCulley JP, Mootha VV. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:878–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uchino Y, Shimmura S, Yamaguchi T, Kawakita T, Matsumoto Y, Negishi K, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness and haze in DSAEK and penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30:287–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubbelman M, Sicam VA, van der Heijde RG. The contribution of the posterior surface to the coma aberration of the human cornea. J Vis. 2007;7(10):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamaguchi T, Ohnuma K, Tomida D, Konomi K, Satake Y, Negishi K, et al. The contribution of the posterior surface to the corneal aberrations in eyes after keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:6222–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dickman MM, Cheng YY, Berendschot TT, van den Biggelaar FJ, Nuijts RM. Effects of graft thickness and asymmetry on visual gain and aberrations after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:737–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:804–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kubaloglu A, Sari ES, Cinar Y, Cingu K, Koytak K, Coskun E, et al. Comparison of mechanical and femtosecond laser tunnel creation for intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus: prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;36:1556–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shousha MA, Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Ide T, Feuer W, Carp CL, et al. Long-term results of femtosecond laser-assisted sutureless anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:315–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaster RN, Dumitrascu O, Rabinowitz YS. Penetrating keratoplasty using femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty with zig-zag incisions versus a mechanical trephine in patients with keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1195–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shehadeh-Mashor R, Chan C, Yeung SN, Lichtinger A, Amiran M, Rootman DS. Long-term outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted mushroom configuration deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013;32:390–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Grentzelos MA, Panagopoulou SI, Stojanovic N, Kankariya VP, et al. Thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond-laser technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1366–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng YY, Hendrikse F, Pels E, Widjh RJ, van Cleynenbreugel H, Eggink CA, et al. Preliminary results of femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1351–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heinzelmann S, Maier P, Bohringer D, Auw-Hadrich C, Reinhard T. Visual outcome and histological findings following femtosecond laser-assisted versus microkeratome-assisted DSAEK. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:1979–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathies secondary to argon laser iridotomy—preliminary results and usefulness of double-glide donor insertion technique. Cornea. 2008;27(Suppl 1):S62–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanabe T, Tomidokoro A, Samejima T, Miyata K, Sato M, Kaji Y, et al. Corneal regular and irregular astigmatism assessed by Fourier analysis of videokeratography data in normal and pathologic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:752–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng YY, van den Berg TJ, Schouten JS, Pels E, Wijdh RJ, van Cleynenbreugel H, et al. Quality of vision after femtosecond laser-assisted descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:556–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosa AM, Silva MF, Quadrado MJ, Costa E, Margues I, Murta JN. Femtosecond laser and microkeratome-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: first clinical results. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:1104–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vetter JM, Butsch C, Faust M, Schimidtmann I, Hoffmann EM, Sekundo W, et al. Irregularity of the posterior corneal surface after curved interface femtosecond laser-assisted versus microkeratome-assisted Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013;32:118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1936–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dapena I, Ham L, Melles GR. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK–the thinner the better? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20:299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hayashi T, Hirayama Y, Yamada N, Shimazaki-Den S, Shimazaki J. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy with an irregular posterior surface. Cornea. 2013;32:1183–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mootha VV, Heck E, Verity SM, Lakshman N, Mufluoglu O, Bowman RW, et al. Comparative study of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation by Moria CBm microkeratome, Horizon microkeratome, and Intralase FS60. Cornea. 2011;30:320–4.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rossi M, Misto R, Gatto C, Garimoldi P, Campanelli M, D’Amato Thothova J. Protective effects of deswelling on stromal collagen denaturation after a corneal femtosecond laser cut. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:4148–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

D. Tomida, None; T. Yamaguchi, None; A. Ogawa, None; Y. Hirayama, None; S. Shimazaki-Den, None; Y. Satake, None; J. Shimazaki, None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takefumi Yamaguchi.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomida, D., Yamaguchi, T., Ogawa, A. et al. Effects of corneal irregular astigmatism on visual acuity after conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol 59, 216–222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-015-0388-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-015-0388-y

Keywords

Navigation