Skip to main content
Log in

Indications for and effects of Nunchaku-style silicone tube intubation for primary acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the indications for and effectiveness of Nunchaku-style silicone tube intubation (NSTI) in treating primary acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction (PALDO).

Methods

In this interventional cohort study, 235 consecutive patients in 1 institution who had complete lacrimal obstruction were investigated. Of those, 212 PALDO patients were enrolled, and 156 of the PALDO patients ultimately satisfied our treatment protocol and were then followed up for 12 months postsurgery. Patients without dacryocystitis underwent NSTI, while those with dacryocystitis underwent NSTI or endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) using the NST as a stent. The tubes were left in place for 8 weeks, and all patients received identical postoperative care. Resolution was deemed as patency assessed by irrigation. Logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the success of NSTI for upper (puncta and canaliculus) and lower (lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct) obstruction, NSTI for lower obstruction with and without dacryocystitis, and NSTI and EN-DCR for lower obstruction with dacryocystitis.

Results

Comparison of the success rates at 12 months postsurgery showed significance as follows: treatment with NSTI was more successful for upper obstruction (94.6 %) than for lower obstruction (71.4 %) [odds ratio (OR) 8.23; P < 0.01]; treatment with NSTI was more successful for lower obstruction without dacryocystitis (82.9 %) than for dacryocystitis (52.4 %) (OR 4.96; P < 0.05); and treatment with EN-DCR (95.5 %) was more successful than NSTI (52.4 %) for treating lower obstruction with dacryocystitis (OR 16.99; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

NSTI is effective for treating PALDO; however, EN-DCR is more effective for treating PALDO cases complicated by dacryocystitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson RL, Edwards JJ. Indications, complications and results with silicone stents. Ophthalmology. 1979;86:1474–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Angrist RC, Dortzbach RK. Silicone intubation for partial and total nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;1:51–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dortzbach RK, France TD, Kushner BJ, Gonnering RS. Silicone intubation for obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:585–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Demirci H, Elner VM. Double silicone tube intubation for the management of partial lacrimal system obstruction. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:383–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pashby RC, Rathbun JE. Silicone tube intubation of the lacrimal drainage system. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1318–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soll DB. Silicone intubation: an alternative to dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 1978;85:1259–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu D, Bosley TM. Silicone nasolacrimal intubation with mitomycin-C: a prospective, randomized, double-masked study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:306–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Psilas K, Eftaxias V, Kastanioudakis J, Kalogeropoulos C. Silicone intubation as an alternative to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal drainage obstruction in adults. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1993;3:71–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Connell PP, Fulcher TP, Chacko E, O’Connor MJ, Moriarty P. Long term follow up of nasolacrimal intubation in adults. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:435–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurihashi K. Bicanalicular silicone intubation using three-piece silicone tubing: direct silicone intubation. Ophthalmologica. 1993;206:57–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kabata Y, Goto S, Takahashi G, Tsuneoka H. Vision-related quality of life in patients undergoing silicone tube intubation for lacrimal passage obstructions. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(147–150):e2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sasaki T, Sounou T, Sugiyama K. Dacryoendoscopic surgery and tube insertion in patients with common canalicular obstruction and ductal stenosis as a frequent complication. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009;53:145–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Inatani M, Yamauchi T, Fukuchi M, Denno S, Miki M. Direct silicone intubation using Nunchaku-style tube (NST-DSI) to treat lacrimal passage obstruction. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:689–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paulsen FP, Thale AB, Maune S, Tillmann BN. New insights into the pathophysiology of primary acquired dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2329–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sasaki T, Nagata Y, Sugiyama K. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction classified by dacryoendoscopy and treated with inferior meatal dacryorhinotomy. Part I: positional diagnosis of primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:1065–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dalgleish R. Idiopathic acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1967;51:463–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khoubian JF, Kikkawa DO, Gonnering RS. Trephination and silicone stent intubation for the treatment of canalicular obstruction: effect of the level of obstruction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22:248–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Font RL, Croxatto JO, Rao NA, American Registry of Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (US). Tumors of the eye and ocular adnexa. Washington, DC: American Registry of Pathology in collaboration with the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 2006.

  19. Stevens A, Lowe J. Human histology. 2nd ed. London: Mosby; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Woog JJ. The incidence of symptomatic acquired lacrimal outflow obstruction among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976–2000 (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:649–66.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Engeland CG, Bosch JA, Cacioppo JT, Marucha PT. Mucosal wound healing: the roles of age and sex. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1193–7 discussion 1198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Engeland CG, Sabzehei B, Marucha PT. Sex hormones and mucosal wound healing. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23:629–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shigeta K-I, Takegoshi H, Kikuchi S. Sex and age differences in the bony nasolacrimal canal: an anatomical study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:1677–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Groessl SA, Sires BS, Lemke BN. An anatomical basis for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:71–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank John Bush for reviewing the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

M. Mimura, None; M. Ueki, None; H. Oku, None; B. Sato, None; T. Ikeda, None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masashi Mimura.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mimura, M., Ueki, M., Oku, H. et al. Indications for and effects of Nunchaku-style silicone tube intubation for primary acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction. Jpn J Ophthalmol 59, 266–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-015-0381-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-015-0381-5

Keywords

Navigation