Skip to main content
Log in

Promoting hunting tourism in north Sweden: opinions of local hunters

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Hunting tourism can help to diversify local economies in rural areas. In northern Sweden, hunting tourism has the potential to counteract outmigration and unemployment, but may entail ecological and social risks. I used a mail survey of 2,110 hunters in rural northern Sweden to assess attitudes toward hunting tourism. Respondents emphasized the importance of hunting to maintain economical, social, and cultural values in the rural areas. Most hunters estimated that game contributed equal or larger amount of meat to their household than meat bought commercially. Few respondents had first hand experience of hunting tourism and they were divided on their attitude towards promoting hunting tourism. Many (46%) were uncertain about their attitude towards hunting tourism; 36% were positive and 18% were negative. Ethical values on using wildlife in hunting tourism and the attitude towards new hunters coming to hunt influenced attitudes on development of hunting tourism. Hunters that were positive to hunting tourism believed that it would create new jobs. Because hunting in Sweden is highly organized and collective, there are no models of hunting tourism adapted to the hunting culture in northern Sweden. The uncertainty of the potential local benefits from a development of hunting tourism should be placed within a research framework, especially in the northernmost parts where governmental undertakings are large and the state can influence land use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergström R, Huldt H, Nilsson T (1992) Swedish game—biology and management. Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, George PJ, Preston RJ, Hughes A, Turner J, Cummins BD (1994) Wildlife harvesting and sustainable regional native economy in the Hudson and James bay lowland, Ontario. Arctic 47:350–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32 doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon B, Adamowicz W (1995) The economic value of moose hunting in Newfoundland. Can J For Res 25:319–328 doi:10.1139/x95-036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson G, Eriksson T, Laitila T, Sandström C, Willebrand T, Öhlund G (2005) Hunting and fishing: extent, importance and management. Mountain MISTRA Rep Ser Umea 14:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell T (2006) The sources of local conflicts in hunting policy: An investigation of game keeping associations in the county of Norrbotten, Sweden. Ph.D. thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden

  • Greider T, Garkovich L (1994) Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociol 59:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein TA (2000) The gun, the dog and the thermos: culture and hunting in Sweden and United States. Sweden and America Fall: 24–29

  • Heberlein TA, Willebrand T (1998) Attitudes toward hunting across time and continents: the United States and Sweden. Game Wildl 15:1071–1080

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning R (1990) Zum Begriff und Inhalt einer Jagdphilosophie. Z Jagdwiss 36:186–194 doi:10.1007/BF02241968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kianicka S, Buchecker M, Hunziker M, Müller-Böker UU (2006) Locals’ and tourists’ sense of place. Mt Res Dev 26:55–63 doi:10.1659/0276-4741(2006)026[0055:LATSOP]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniivilä M, Saastamoinen O (2002) The opportunity costs of forest conservation in a local economy. Silva Fenn 36:853–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1981) A Sand County almanac with other essays on conservation from Round River. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression using random Forest. R News 2:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren T (2005) The determinants of economic growth in the Swedish mountain region—the role of the forest and tourism sector, and protected land. Mountain MISTRA Rep Ser Umea 11:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundmark L (2006) Restructuring and employment change in sparsely populated areas. Ph.D. thesis, Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

  • Lundmark T, Bergsten U (1998) Forskningsprogrammet för den boreala skogens nyttjande. Skog och Trä 1998:1. Vindelns Försöksparker, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Umeå, Sweden

  • MacKay KJ, Campbell JM (2004) An examination of residents’ support for hunting as a tourism product. Tour Manage 25:443–452 doi:10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00127-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson L (1990) Moose management and the economic value of hunting: towards bioeconomic analysis. Scand J For Res 5:575–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner-Gulland EJ, Akcakaya HR (2001) Sustainability indices for exploited populations. Trends Ecol Evol 16:686–692 doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02278-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray M, Simcox H (2003) Use of wild living resources in the United Kingdom—a review. UK Committee for IUCN, Petersborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson F, Kerasote T, King RJH, Bateson P, Eves HE, Wolf CM, Yaich SC (2005) The ethics of hunting. Front Ecol Environ 3:392–397 doi:10.2307/3868590

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien EA (2005) Publics and woodlands in England: well-being, local identity, social learning, conflict and management. Forestry 78:321–336 doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset J (1985) Meditations on hunting. Scribner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Radder L (2005) Motives of international trophy hunters. Ann Tourism Res 32:1141–1144 doi:10.1016/j.annals.2004.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid R (1999) Economic value of resident hunting in British Columbia. The living forest: non-market benefits of forestry. In: Roper CS, Park A (eds) Proceedings of an International Symposium on Non-market Benefits of Forestry, Edinburgh, UK, 24–28 June 1996. Forestry Commission Bulletin. HMSO, London, pp 334–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockel ML, Kealy MJ (1991) The value of nonconsumptive wildlife recreation in the United States. Land Econ 67:422–434 doi:10.2307/3146549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snepenger DJ, Bowyer RT (1990) Differences among nonresident tourists making consumptive and nonconsumptive uses of Alaskan wildlife. Arctic 43:262–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman RC, Heberlein TA (2001) Hunting and rural socialization: contingent effects of the rural setting on hunting participation. Rural Sociol 66:599–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Storaas T, Gundersen H, Henriksen H, Andreassen HP (2001) The economic value of moose in Norway: a review. Alces 37:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson CS, Thomas M, Donnelly DM (1989) Economic value of big game hunting in southeast Alaska. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Resource Bulletin RM-16

  • Wiberg U (2005) Future perspectives for sparsely populated areas in Sweden. In: Kobayashi K, Westlund H, Matsushima K (eds), Social Capital and Development Trends in Rural Areas. Marginal Areas Research Group, Kyoto University, 159–168

  • Willebrand T, Sandström C, Lundgren T (2006) Reaching for new perspectives on socio-ecological systems: exploring the possibilities for adaptive co-management in the Swedish mountain region. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage 2:359–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn H, Manfredo M, Vaske J, Wittmann K (1998) Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions. Soc Nat Resour 11:649–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Fredrik Dahl, PO Hopfgarten for the help keeping this project running. I am grateful to Thomas Heberlein and one anonymous referee for valuable comments on the different versions of this manuscript. This study was financed by the European Commission’s Structural Funds Objective 6 Area.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas Willebrand.

Additional information

Communicated by W. Lutz

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 The questions and the alternative responses for the questions used in major analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Willebrand, T. Promoting hunting tourism in north Sweden: opinions of local hunters. Eur J Wildl Res 55, 209–216 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0235-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0235-2

Keywords

Navigation