Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A two-colored chewing gum test for assessing masticatory performance: a preliminary study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare subjective and objective assessment methods of a two-colored chewing gum test and to find out whether these methods are capable of discriminating masticatory performances between sexes. 31 adults, 16 males and 15 females participated in this study. Each subject chewed five samples of two-colored chewing gum sticks for 5, 10, 20, 30 and 50 chewing strokes, respectively. The subjective color-mixing and shape indices for the gum bolus (SCMI-B, SSI-B) and the subjective color-mixing index and objective color-mixing ratio for the gum wafer (SCMI-W, OCMR-W) were evaluated by two independent examiners and, on a different day, re-evaluated by one of the examiners. The SCMI-B and SCMI-W assessments had inter- and intra-examiner reliable agreement at 20 or more chewing strokes. The OCMR-W measurement demonstrated high accuracy and low reproducibility between and within the examiners. There were significant gender differences in the distribution of SCMI-W scores (P = 0.044) and in the mean OCMI-W (P = 0.007). The SCMI-B and SCMI-W assessments and the OCMR-W measurement were reliable and valid at the 20 and 30 chewing strokes in this two-colored chewing gum test. The subjective color-mixing index (SCMI-W) and objective color-mixing ratio (OCMR-W) for the chewing gum wafer are capable of discriminating masticatory performance between sexes in this two-colored chewing gum test and that the OCMR-W measurement is discriminating better than the SCMI-W assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magalhaes IB, Pereira LJ, Marques LS, Gameiro GH. The influence of malocclusion on masticatory performance: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:981–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function—a review of the literature. III. Masticatory performance and efficiency. J Oral Rehabil. 1976;3:57–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van der Bilt A, Olthoff LW, Oosterhaven SP. The effect of missing postcanine teeth on chewing performance in man. Arch Oral Biol. 1993;38:423–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Julien KC, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Dechow PC. Normal masticatory performance in young adults and children. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Toro A, Buschang PH, Throckmorton G, Roldan S. Masticatory performance in children and adolescents with Class I and II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:112–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. English JD, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS. Does malocclusion affect masticatory performance? Angle Orthod. 2002;72:21–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sato H, Fueki K, Sueda S, Sato S, Shiozaki T, Kato M, Ohyama T. A new and simple method for evaluating masticatory function using newly developed artificial test food. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:68–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucas PW, Luke DA. Is food particle size a criterion for the initiation of swallowing? J Oral Rehabil. 1986;13:127–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiere FR, Manly RS. The effect of the changing dentition on masticatory function. J Dent Res. 1952;31:526–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liedberg B, Spiechowicz E, Owall B. Mastication with and without removable partial dentures: an intraindividual study. Dysphagia. 1995;10:107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schimmel M, Leemann B, Herrmann FR, Kiliaridis S, Schnider A, Muller F. Masticatory function and bite force in stroke patients. J Dent Res. 2011;90:230–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van den Braber W, van der Glas H, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Masticatory function in retrognathic patients, before and after mandibular advancement surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:549–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van den Braber W, van der Bilt A, van der Glas H, Rosenberg T, Koole R. The Influence of mandibular advancement surgery on oral function in retrognathic patients: a 5-year follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1237–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schimmel M, Christou P, Herrmann F, Muller F. A two-colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency: development of different assessment methods. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:671–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liedberg B, Owall B. Masticatory ability in experimentally induced xerostomia. Dysphagia. 1991;6:211–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liedberg B, Owall B. Oral bolus kneading and shaping measured with chewing gum. Dysphagia. 1995;10:101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prinz JF. Quantitative evaluation of the effect of bolus size and number of chewing strokes on the intra-oral mixing of a two-colour chewing gum. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:243–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Bilt A, Mojet J, Tekamp FA, Abbink JH. Comparing masticatory performance and mixing ability. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sato S, Fueki K, Sato H, Sueda S, Shiozaki T, Kato M, Ohyama T. Validity and reliability of a newly developed method for evaluating masticatory function using discriminant analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:146–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Speksnijder CM, Abbink JH, van der Glas HW, Janssen NG, van der Bilt A. Mixing ability test compared with a comminution test in persons with normal and compromised masticatory performance. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:580–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Bilt A, Speksnijder CM, de Liz Pocztaruk R. Digital image processing versus visual assessment of chewed two-colour wax in mixing ability tests. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilding RJC, Lewin A. The determination of optimal human jaw movements based on their association with chewing performance. Arch oral Biol. 1994;39:333–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Landis RJ, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Othman S, Harradine N. Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:668–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiya Endo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Endo, T., Komatsuzaki, A., Kurokawa, H. et al. A two-colored chewing gum test for assessing masticatory performance: a preliminary study. Odontology 102, 68–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-012-0089-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-012-0089-7

Keywords

Navigation