Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether water infusion colonoscopy (WIC) is a more effective diagnostic tool than standard air insufflation colonoscopy (AIC).

Methods

All articles pertinent to a comparison of water-related methods and air insufflation to facilitate insertion of the colonoscope were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Pooling results were derived by using the Review Manager Software. Outcomes were assessed using the weighted mean difference (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for continuous variables and the odds ratios (OR) with 95 % CI for dichotomous variables.

Results

Eighteen studies involving 2,797 patients were included. WIC was associated with a significantly higher cecal intubation rate than AIC (OR = 1.90; 95 % CI 1.21–2.99; p = 0.005). The intubation time was similar for the two types of colonoscopy, but in WIC there was a significantly lower visual analog scale score for abdominal pain than in AIC (MD = −1.30; 95 % CI −2.03 to −0.58; p < 0.001) without sacrificing the polyp detection rate (OR = 1.17; 95 % CI 0.78–1.77; p = 0.44). Statistically, the patient’s willingness to repeat colonoscopy was significantly greater for WIC than for AIC (OR = 1.74; 95 % CI 1.14–2.67; p < 0.01). Furthermore, in the subgroup for trainees, the WIC group achieved a higher cecal intubation rate (OR = 1.83; 95 % CI 1.15–2.93; p = 0.01) and a shorter intubation time (MD = −1.72 min; 95 % CI −3.34 to −0.11; p = 0.04) than the AIC group.

Conclusions

In contrast to AIC, WIC improved cecal intubation, alleviated abdominal pain, and increased patients’ willingness to repeat the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA et al (2010) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 116:544–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindsay DC, Freeman JG, Cobden I et al (1988) Should colonoscopy be the first investigation for colonic disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 296:167–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Waye JD, Bashkoff E (1991) Total colonoscopy: is it always possible. Gastrointest Endosc 37:152–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leung FW (2008) Methods of reducing discomfort during colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 53:1462–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falchuk ZM, Griffin PH (1984) A technique to facilitate colonoscopy in areas of severe diverticular disease. N Engl J Med 310:598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leung JW, Salera R, Toomsen L et al (2009) Pilot feasibility study of the method of water infusion without air insufflation in sedated colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 54:1997–2001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brocchi E, Pezzilli R, Tomassetti P et al (2008) Warm water or oil-assisted colonoscopy: toward simpler examinations. Am J Gastroenterol 103:581–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leung JW, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R et al (2009) A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 70:505–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leung CW, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R et al (2010) Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation. Endoscopy 42:557–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ransibrahmanakul K, Leung JW, Mann SK et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of water vs. air methods in minimal sedation colonoscopy performed by supervised trainees in the US-randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Med 7:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh YH, Lin HJ, Tseng KC (2011) Limited water infusion decreases pain during minimally sedated colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 17:2236–2240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leung J, Mann S, Siao-Salera R et al (2011) A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U.S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 73:103–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amato A, Arnaldo R, Franco P et al (2011) Carbon dioxide insufflation (CO2) and Warm Water infusion (WWI) versus standard air insufflation (AI): preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial in unsedated colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 73:AB137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamamoto N, Nakanishi Y, Morimoto N et al (2002) A new water instillation method for colonoscopy without sedation as performed by endoscopists-in-training. Gastrointest Endosc 56:825–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G et al (2010) A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc 72:693–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park SC, Keum B, Kim ES et al (2010) Usefulness of warm water and oil assistance in colonoscopy by trainees. Dig Dis Sci 55:2940–2944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawant PD, Samarth A, Vashishtha C, Patel J, Agasti A (2011) Water infusion versus air insufflation colonoscopy in unsedated patients—impact on patient discomfort. Gastrointest Endosc 73:AB408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pohl J, Messer I, Behrens A et al (2011) Water infusion for cecal intubation increases patient tolerance, but does not improve intubation of unsedated colonoscopies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:1039–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Radaelli F, Paggi S, Amato A et al (2010) Warm water infusion versus air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 72:701–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2008) Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Book Series, pp 187–241

  22. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA (2006) A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med 25:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramirez FC, Leung FW (2011) A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol 1:130–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Portocarrero DJ, Che K, Olafsson S et al (2012) A pilot study to assess feasibility of the water method to aid colonoscope insertion in community settings in the United States. J Interv Gastroenterol 2:20–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryu KH, Huh KC, Kang YW et al (2012) An effective instillation method for water-assisted colonoscopy as performed by in-training endoscopists in terms of volume and temperature. Dig Dis Sci 57:142–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Falt P, Liberda M, Smajstrla V et al (2012) Combination of water immersion and carbon dioxide insufflation for minimal sedation colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, single-center trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:971–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsieh YH, Tseng KC, Hsieh JJ, Tseng CW, Hung TH, Leung FW (2011) Feasibility of colonoscopy with water infusion in minimally sedated patients in an Asian Community Setting. J Interv Gastroenterol 1:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Church JM (2002) Warm water irrigation for dealing with spasm during colonoscopy: simple, inexpensive, and effective. Gastrointest Endosc 56:672–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J et al (2000) Patient tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation during screening examination for colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 52:606–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Leung FW (2008) Water-related techniques for performance of colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 53:2847–2850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People’s Republic of China

    D. Hu, Y. Xu, Y. Sun & Q. Zhu

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of SuZhou University, SuZhou, 215004, JiangSu Province, China

    D. Hu

Authors
  1. D. Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Q. Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q. Zhu.

Additional information

D. Hu and Y. Xu contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, D., Xu, Y., Sun, Y. et al. Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol 17, 487–496 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1023-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1023-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation