Abstract
Minimally invasive procedures in spine surgery have undergone significant development in recent times. These procedures have the common aim of avoiding biomechanical complications associated with some traditional destructive methods and improving efficacy. These new techniques prevent damage to crucial posterior stabilizers and preserve the structural integrity and stability of the spine. The wide variety of reported minimally invasive methods for different pathologies necessitates a systematic classification. In the present review, authors first provide a classification system of minimally invasive techniques based on the location of the pathologic lesion to be treated, to help the surgeon in selecting the appropriate procedure. Minimally invasive techniques are then described in detail, including technical features, advantages, complications, and clinical outcomes, based on available literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ALIF:
-
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion
- BLBD:
-
Bilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression
- DLIF:
-
Direct lateral interbody fusion
- MED:
-
Microendoscopic discectomy
- miPLIF:
-
Minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion
- MISST:
-
Minimally invasive spine surgery technique
- miTLIF:
-
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
- PED:
-
Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy
- PEEK:
-
Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone
- PLDD:
-
Percutaneous laser disc decompression
- PLIF:
-
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion
- TLIF:
-
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
- ULBD:
-
Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression
- XLIF:
-
Extreme lateral interbody fusion
References
Ahn Y (2012) Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical tips to prevent complications. Expert Rev Med Devices 9(4):361–366
Arnold PM, Anderson KK, McGuire RA Jr (2012) The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: a review far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Surg Neurol Int 3(Suppl 3):S198–S215
Aryan HE, Newman CB, Gold JJ, Acosta FL Jr, Coover C, Ames CP (2008) Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51(4):225–230
Audat Z, Moutasem O, Yousef K, Mohammad B (2012) Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine. Singap Med J 53(3):183–187
Banczerowski P, Bognar L, Rappaport ZH, Veres R, Vajda J (2014) Novel surgical approach in the management of longitudinal pathologies within the spinal canal: the split laminotomy and “archbone” technique. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 41:47–70
Banczerowski P, Lipóth L, Veres R (2007) [Bilateral “over the top” decompression through unilateral laminotomy for lumbar and thoracic spinal canal stenosis]. Ideggyogy Sz 60(11–12):467–473, Article in Hungarian
Banczerowski P, Vajda J, Veres R (2008) Removal of intraspinal space-occupying lesions through unilateral partial approach, the “hemi-semi laminectomy”. Ideggyogy Sz 61(3–4):114–122, Article in Hungarian
Banczerowski P, Vajda J, Veres R (2008) Exploration and decompression of the spinal canal using split laminotomy and its modification, the “archbone” technique. Neurosurgery 62(5 Suppl 2):ONS432–ONS440
Banczerowski P, Veres R, Vajda J (2009) Modified minimally invasive surgical approach to cervical neuromas with intraforaminal components: hemi-semi-laminectomy and supraforaminal burr hole (modified foraminotomy) technique. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 52(1):56–58
Banczerowski P, Veres R, Vajda J (2012) New minimally invasive surgical techniques in spinal surgery. Ideggyogy Sz 65(5–6):169–180, Article in Hungarian
Banczerowski P, Veres R, Vajda J (2014) Modified surgical approach to cervical neuromas with intraforaminal components: minimal invasive facet joint sparing “open-tunnel” technique. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 75(1):16–19
Boachie-Adjei O, Cho W, King AB (2013) Axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) approach for adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S225–S231
Bognár L, Madarassy G, Vajda J (2004) Split laminotomy in pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 20(2):110–113
Bowers C, Amini A, Dailey AT, Schmidt MH (2010) Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: review of complications associated with the X-Stop device. Neurosurg Focus 28(6):E8
Casal-Moro R, Castro-Menéndez M, Hernández-Blanco M, Bravo-Ricoy JA, Jorge-Barreiro FJ (2011) Long-term outcome after microendoscopic diskectomy for lumbar disk herniation: a prospective clinical study with a 5-year follow-up. Neurosurgery 68(6):1568–1575
Cheung NK, Ferch RD, Ghahreman A, Bogduk N (2013) Long-term follow-up of minimal-access and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 72(3):443–451
Chiu JC (2006) Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Surg Technol Int 15:265–275
Cho DY, Lin HL, Lee WY, Lee HC (2007) Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg Spine 6(3):229–239
Choi G, Arbatti NJ, Modi HN, Prada N, Kim JS, Kim HJ et al (2010) Transcorporeal tunnel approach for unilateral cervical radiculopathy: a 2-year follow-up review and results. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53(3):127–131
Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, Chae YS, Jung B, Lee S (2007) Modified transcorporeal anterior cervical microforaminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: a technical note and early results. Eur Spine J 16(9):1387–1393
Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, Raiturker PP, Chae YS (2007) Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(2):E93–E99
Choi G, Lee SH, Raiturker PP, Lee S, Chae YS (2006) Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for intracanalicular disc herniations at L5-S1 using a rigid working channel endoscope. Neurosurgery 58(1 Suppl):ONS59–ONS68
Choy DS (1991) PLDD offers advantages of safety, simplicity, speed. Clin Laser Mon 9(3):39–41
Choy DS (1995) Clinical experience and results with 389 PLDD procedures with the Nd:YAG laser, 1986 to 1995. J Clin Laser Med Surg 13(3):209–213
Clarke MJ, Ecker RD, Krauss WE, McClelland RL, Dekutoski MB (2007) Same-segment and adjacent-segment disease following posterior cervical foraminotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 6(1):5–9
Cole CD, McCall TD, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT (2009) Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2(2):118–126
Costa F, Sassi M, Cardia A, Ortolina A, De Santis A, Luccarell G et al (2007) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression. J Neurosurg Spine 7(6):579–586
Cragg A, Carl A, Casteneda F, Dickman C, Guterman L, Oliveira C (2004) New percutaneous access method for minimally invasive anterior lumbosacral surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:21–28
Curto DD, Kim JS, Lee SH (2013) Minimally invasive posterior cervical microforaminotomy in the lower cervical spine and C-T junction assisted by O-arm-based navigation. Comput Aided Surg 18(3–4):76–83
Dezawa A, Mikami H, Sairyo K (2012) Percutaneous endoscopic translaminar approach for herniated nucleus pulposus in the hidden zone of the lumbar spine. Asian J Endosc Surg 5(4):200–203
Dezawa A, Sairyo K (2011) New minimally invasive discectomy technique through the interlaminar space using a percutaneous endoscope. Asian J Endosc Surg 4(2):94–98
Epstein NE (2012) A review of interspinous fusion devices: high complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes. Surg Neurol Int 3:7
Erkan S, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Hsu B, Pahl DW, Transfeldt EE (2009) Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 18(6):807–814
Eule JM, Breeze R, Kindt GW (1999) Bilateral partial laminectomy: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis and midline disc herniation. Surg Neurol 52(4):329–337
Fessler RG, Khoo LT (2002) Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy: an initial clinical experience. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S37–S45
Foley KT, Gupta SK, Justis JR, Sherman MC (2001) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. Neurosurg Focus 10(4):E10
Foley KT, Gupta SK (2002) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg 97(1 Suppl):7–12
Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307
Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Ide C, Brunner P, Klinkert A, Warter JM (1996) Percutaneous laser disk decompression under CT and fluoroscopic guidance: indications, techniques, and clinical experience. Radiographics 16(1):89–96
González-Martínez EL, García-Cosamalón PJ, Fernández-Fernández JJ, Ibáñez-Plágaro FJ, Alvarez B (2012) Minimally invasive approach of extramedullary intradural spinal tumours. Review of 30 cases. Neurocirugia (Astur) 23(5):175–181, Article in Spanish
Habib A, Smith ZA, Lawton CD, Fessler RG (2012) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a perspective on current evidence and clinical knowledge. Minim Invasive Surg 2012:657342
Han IH, Kuh SU, Kim JH, Chin DK, Kim KS, Yoon YS et al (2008) Clinical approach and surgical strategy for spinal diseases in pregnant women: a report of ten cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(17):E614–E619
Hilton DL Jr (2007) Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy with three-dimensional microscopic visualization and localization with anterior/posterior imaging. Spine J 7(2):154–158
Hong SW, Choi KY, Ahn Y, Baek OK, Wang JC, Lee SH et al (2011) A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(3):E172–E178
Hong WJ, Kim WK, Park CW, Lee SG, Yoo CJ, Kim YB et al (2006) Comparison between transuncal approach and upper vertebral transcorporeal approach for unilateral cervical radiculopathy—a preliminary report. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49(5):296–301
Houten JK, Alexandre LC, Nasser R, Wollowick AL (2011) Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 15(3):280–284
Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O’Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S, Ondra S et al (2007) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 7(4):379–386
Hsu KY, Zuchermann JF, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ et al (2006) Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted. J Neurosurg Spine 5:500–507
Jagannathan J, Sherman JH, Szabo T, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA (2009) The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years’ clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 10(4):347–356
Jang JW, Park JH, Hyun SJ, Rhim SC (2012) Clinical outcomes and radiologic changes following microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach in patients with lumbar canal stenosis and grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis with a minimum 3-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech
Jho HD (1996) Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy. A new approach to cervical disc herniation. J Neurosurg 84(2):155–160
Jho HD, Kim WK, Kim MH (2002) Anterior microforaminotomy for treatment of cervical radiculopathy: part 1—disc preserving “functional cervical disc surgery”. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S46–53
Jiang SD, Chen JW, Jiang LS (2012) Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(9):1259–1266
Jödicke A, Daentzer D, Kästner S, Asamoto S, Böker DK (2003) Risk factors for outcome and complications of dorsal foraminotomy in cervical disc herniation. Surg Neurol 60(2):124–129, discussion 129–30
Kepler CK, Bogner EA, Herzog RJ, Huang RC (2011) Anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus with respect to the surgical approach for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20:550–556
Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, Fessler RG (2002) Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S166–1
Khoo LT, Perez-Cruet MJ, Laich DT, Fessler RG (2002) Posterior cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy. In: Perez-Cruet MJ, Fessler RG (eds) Outpatient spinal surgery. Quality Medical Publishing, Inc., St. Louis, pp 71–93
Kim DH, Shanti N, Tantorski ME, Shaw JD, Li L, Martha JF et al (2012) Association between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinous process fracture after interspinous process spacer surgery. Spine J 12(6):466–472
Kim JS, Choi WG, Lee SH (2010) Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine J 10(5):404–409
Kim JS, Jung B, Lee SH (2012) Instrumented minimally invasive spinal-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF); minimum 5-years follow-up with clinical and radiologic outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827415cd
Kim JS, Kang BU, Lee SH, Jung B, Choi YG, Jeon SH et al (2009) Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 22(2):114–121
Kim K, Isu T, Sugawara A, Matsumoto R, Isobe M (2008) Comparison of the effect of 3 different approaches to the lumbar spinal canal on postoperative paraspinal muscle damage. Surg Neurol 69(2):109–113
Kim KT, Kim YB (2009) Comparison between open procedure and tubular retractor assisted procedure for cervical radiculopathy: results of a randomized controlled study. J Korean Med Sci 24(4):649–653
Kishan A, Gropper MR (2006) Thoracic laminectomy. In: Fessler RG, Sekhar L (eds) Atlas of neurosurgical techniques: spine and peripheral nerves. Thieme, Inc., New York, pp 448–451
Koch-Wiewrodt D, Wagner W, Perneczky A (2007) Unilateral multilevel interlaminar fenestration instead of laminectomy or hemilaminectomy: an alternative surgical approach to intraspinal space occupying lesions. J Neurosurg Spine 6:485–492
Koga S, Sairyo K, Shibuya I, Kanamori Y, Kosugi T, Matsumoto H et al (2012) Minimally invasive removal of a recurrent lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus by the small incised microendoscopic discectomy interlaminar approach. Asian J Endosc Surg 5(1):34–37
Komp M, Hahn P, Merk H, Godolias G, Ruetten S (2011) Bilateral operation of lumbar degenerative central spinal stenosis in full-endoscopic interlaminar technique with unilateral approach: prospective 2-year results of 74 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(5):281
Kondrashov DG, Hannibal M, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF (2006) Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis. A 4-year follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:323–327
Lauryssen C (2007) Appropriate selection of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis for interspinous decompression with the XSTOP device. Neurosurg Focus 22(1):E5
Lawton CD, Smith ZA, Barnawi A, Fessler RG (2011) The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Sci 55(3):259–264
Lee CH, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2012) What is a reasonable surgical procedure for spinal extradural arachnoid cysts: is cyst removal mandatory? Eight consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154(7):1219–1227
Lee JC, Jang HD, Shin BJ (2012) Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(18):1548–1557
Lee JY, Löhr M, Impekoven P, Koebke J, Ernestus RI, Ebel H et al (2006) Small keyhole transuncal foraminotomy for unilateral cervical radiculopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148(9):951–958
Lee P, Fessler RG (2012) Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults. J Clin Neurosci 19(1):111–114
Lew SM, Mehalic TF, Fagone KL (2001) Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of far-lateral and foraminal lumbar disc herniations. J Neurosurg 94(2 Suppl):216–220
Lindley EM, McCullough MA, Burger EL, Brown CW, Patel VV (2011) Complications of axial lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 15(3):273–279
Logroscino CA, Proietti L, Pola E, Scaramuzzo L, Tamburrelli FC (2011) A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S41–S45
Marchi L, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Castro C, Coutinho T, Coutinho E et al (2012) Lateral interbody fusion for treatment of discogenic low back pain: minimally invasive surgical techniques. Adv Orthop 2012:282068
Marchi L, Oliveira L, Coutinho E, Pimenta L (2012) Results and complications after 2-level axial lumbar interbody fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 17(3):187–192
Mathews HH, Evans MT, Molligan HJ, Long BH (1995) Laparoscopic discectomy with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(16):1797–1802
Mayer HM (1997) A new technique of minimally invasive anterior lumbar spine fusion. Spine 22:691–699
Mayer HM, Brock M (1993) Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. J Neurosurg 78(2):216–225
McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Geis WP, Fedder IL (1998) Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK. Spine 23:1476–1484
Mikhael MM, Celestre PC, Wolf CF, Mroz TE, Wang JC (2012) Minimally invasive cervical spine foraminotomy and lateral mass screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(5):E318–E322
Min JH, Jang JS, Lee SH (2007) Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 7(1):21–26
Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J (2011) Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 18(6):741–749
Nakanishi K, Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Okuda T, Kamei N, Nakamae T et al (2013) Medium-term clinical results of microsurgical lumbar flavectomy that preserves facet joints in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of bilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression by a unilateral approach. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(7):351–358
Oertel MF, Ryang YM, Korinth MC, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V (2006) Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. Neurosurgery 59(6):1264–1269, discussion 1269–70
Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Miyauchi A, Aono H, Morita M, Yamamoto T (2004) Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(14):1535–1540
Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE (2009) Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 27(3):E9
Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6(4):435–443
Padanyi C, Vajda J, Banczerowski P (2014) Para-split laminotomy: a rescue technique for split laminotomy approach in exploring intramedullary midline located pathologies. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 75(4):310–316
Papavero L, Thiel M, Fritzsche E, Kunze C, Westphal M, Kothe R (2009) Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach. Neurosurgery 65(6 Suppl):182–187
Papp Z, Vajda J, Veres R, Banczerowski P (2010) Minimal invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of pathologic lesions, situated in the midline of the spinal canal. Biomech Hung 3(1):189–200
Papp Z (2009) Removal of multiple thoracic dumbbell tumours through combined hemi-semi laminectomy and minimal invasive paraspinal approach. Ideggyogy Sz 62(7–8):265–270, Article in Hungarian
Park SH, Park WM, Park CW, Kang KS, Lee YK, Lim SR (2009) Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous translaminar facet screw fixation in elderly patients. J Neurosurg Spine 10(6):610–616
Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Zuckerman SL, Godil SS, Cheng JS et al (2013) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. World Neurosurg. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.041
Perez-Cruet MJ, Foley KT, Isaacs RE, Rice-Wyllie L, Wellington R, Smith MM et al (2002) Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical note. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S129–S136
Plancarte R, Calvillo O (1997) Complex regional pain syndrome type 2 (causalgia) after automated laser discectomy. A case report. Spine 22:459–461
Rapp SM, Miller LE, Block JE (2011) AxiaLIF system: minimally invasive device for presacral lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Med Devices (Auckl) 4:125–131
Regev GJ, Chen L, Dhawan M, Lee YP, Garfin SR, Kim CW (2009) Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines. Spine 34:1330–1335
Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, Beaupre GS, Yerby SA (2005) The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic claudication. Spine 30:744–749
Ringel F, Stoffel M, Stüer C, Meyer B (2006) Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 59(4 Suppl 2):ONS361–ONS366
Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(1):26–32
Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M (2011) Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(5):288–296
Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2008) Full-endoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9-mm endoscopes: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(9):940–948
Sairyo K, Sakai T, Higashino K, Inoue M, Yasui N, Dezawa A (2010) Complications of endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53(4):175–178
Sario-glu AC, Hanci M, Bozkuş H, Kaynar MY, Kafadar A (1997) Unilateral hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal space-occupying lesions. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 40(2):74–77
Schulte LM, O’Brien JR, Matteini LE, Yu WD (2011) Change in sagittal balance with placement of an interspinous spacer. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(20):E1302–E1305
Schwender JD, Holly L, Rouben D, Foley K (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:1–6
Siddiqui M, Karadimas E, Nicol M, Smith FW, Wardlaw D (2006) Influence of X Stop on neural foraminal and spinal canal area in spinal stenosis. Spine 31:2958–2962
Singh V, Manchikanti L, Benyamin RM, Helm S, Hirsch JA (2009) Percutaneous lumbar laser disc decompression: a systematic review of current evidence. Pain Physician 12(3):573–588
Smith JS, Eichholz KM, Shafizadeh S, Ogden AT, O’Toole JE, Fessler RG (2013) Minimally invasive thoracic microendoscopic diskectomy: surgical technique and case series. World Neurosurg 80(3–4):421–427
Smith WD, Youssef JA, Christian G, Serrano S, Hyde JA (2011) Lumbarized sacrum as a relative contraindication for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion at L5-6. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:156–165
Spetzger U, Bertalanffy H, Naujokat C, von Keyserlingk DG, Gilsbach JM (1997) Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: anatomical and surgical considerations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(5):392–396
Spetzger U, Bertalanffy H, Reinges MH, Gilsbach JM (1997) Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: clinical experiences. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(5):397–403
Tandon N, Vollmer DG (2006) Cervical laminectomy. In: Fessler RG, Sekhar L (eds) Atlas of neurosurgical techniques: spine and peripheral nerves. Thieme, Inc, New York, pp 233–238
Tenenbaum S, Arzi H, Herman A, Friedlander A, Levinkopf M, Arnold PM et al (2011) Percutaneous posterolateral transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: clinical outcome, complications, and learning curve evaluation. Surg Technol Int XXI:278–283
Than KD, Wang AC, Rahman SU, Wilson TJ, Valdivia JM, Park P et al (2011) Complication avoidance and management in anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E6
Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, Wöhrle J et al (2005) Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 3:129–141
Tobler WD, Gerszten PC, Bradley WD, Raley TJ, Nasca RJ, Block JE (2011) Minimally invasive axial presacral L5-S1 interbody fusion: two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(20):E1296–E1301
Wang B, Lü G, Patel AA, Ren P, Cheng I (2011) An evaluation of the learning curve for a complex surgical technique: the full endoscopic interlaminar approach for lumbar disc herniations. Spine J 11(2):122–130
Wang J, Zhou Y, Feng Zhang Z, Qing Li C, Jie Zheng W, Liu J (2012) Comparison of clinical outcome in overweight or obese patients after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(4):202–206
Wang M, Zhou Y, Wang J, Zhang Z, Li C (2012) A 10-year follow-up study on long-term clinical outcomes of lumbar microendoscopic discectomy. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 73(4):195–198
Watanabe K, Hosoya T, Shiraishi T, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2005) Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 3(5):405–408
Watanabe K, Matsumoto M, Ikegami T, Nishiwaki Y, Tsuji T, Ishii K et al (2011) Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study. J Neurosurg Spine 14(1):51–58
Winder MJ, Thomas KC (2011) Minimally invasive versus open approach for cervical laminoforaminotomy. Can J Neurol Sci 38(2):262–267
Witzmann A, Hejazi N, Krasznai L (2000) Posterior cervical foraminotomy. A follow-up study of 67 surgically treated patients with compressive radiculopathy. Neurosurg Rev 23(4):213–217
Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Henkel J, Brawanski A (2000) Long term outcome after cervical foraminotomy. J Clin Neurosci 7(4):312–315
Yaşargil MG, Tranmer BI, Adamson TE, Roth P (1991) Unilateral partial hemi-laminectomy for the removal of extra- and intramedullary tumours and AVMs. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 18:113–132
Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA, Raley E, DeBauche S, Shucosky E et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(26 Suppl):S302–S311
Yu Y, Zhang X, Hu F, Xie T, Gu Y (2011) Minimally invasive microsurgical treatment of cervical intraspinal extramedullary tumors. J Clin Neurosci 18(9):1168–1173
Zdeblick TA, Phillips FM (2003) Interbody cage devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(15 Suppl):S2–S7
Zucherman JF, Zdeblick TA, Bailey SA, Mahvi D, Hsu KY, Kohrs D (1995) Instrumented laparoscopic spinal fusion. Preliminary results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(18):2029–2034
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to Zsófia Perjés M.D. for the excellent illustrations.
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Comments
Tamas Doczi, Pecs, Hungary
The goals of minimally invasive spine surgery are (1) to avoid biomechanical complications inherent in traditional destructive techniques and (2) to improve the efficacy of surgical management of various spinal diseases. The purpose is aimed to be achieved by avoiding structural damage to crucial posterior stabilizing elements and by preserving both anatomical integrity and stability of the spine. The aim of this manuscript is to formulate a systematic classification of various minimally invasive methods previously reported that were applied for different pathologies. The authors also claim that the manuscript shall help spinal surgeons in the selection of the appropriate approach or procedure. To achieve these goals, minimally invasive techniques have been described in details including technical features, advantages, complications, and clinical outcomes based on personal experience and available literature. As an overview, it is not an original study in terms of setting first a hypothesis then trying to prove or disprove the concept with facts and figures that are based on either own data or on those collected from literature search. It is a description of available surgical techniques and creation of a system according to the authors’ personal view. It is rather questionable whether the manuscript can really help spinal surgeons in the selection of the appropriate procedure in an individual case. As a trial of setting a nomenclature for spinal surgeons in the field of minimally invasive surgery, this manuscript well deserves publication.
Sandro M. Krieg, Bernhard Meyer, Munich, Germany
Nowadays, spine surgeons have a large armamentarium of procedures and treatment options at hand, which also include various minimally invasive procedures. It is therefore highly welcomed that the present review offers not only an overview but also the recommendation for a classification system of minimally invasive techniques. The targets of this article are two different types of surgeons: experienced spine surgeons who might get another view on some of their own surgical approaches and junior surgeons who need a structured overview for daily decision-making processes.
However, a very wide variety of approaches is presented and some quantification concerning the frequency of use or applicability as well as actual percentages of treatment success or complications seem desirable. Moreover, the characterization and choice of references concerning endoscopic techniques are highly biased and do not mirror daily routine or the current state of evidence. This accords also to laser techniques. More critical statements from an evidence-based point of view would increase the value of this article. Moreover, in the age of increasing use of posterior dynamic stabilization by screw-rod systems, this option deserves at least some notice in a systematic overview.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banczerowski, P., Czigléczki, G., Papp, Z. et al. Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 38, 11–26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-014-0565-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-014-0565-3