Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques for fixing mandibular angle fractures: the introduction of a new 3D plate approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the use of a three-dimensional (3D) square-shaped plate for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.

Materials and methods

Synthetic mandible replicas were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the 3D square plate along with three other mandibular angle plating techniques. The plating techniques consisted of: (1) a 3D miniplate (2 × 2 holes, square, 2 mm); (2) a 3D miniplate (6 × 2 holes, curved, 2 mm); (3) two miniplates (four holes, straight, 2 mm and 1.6 mm); and (4) one single miniplate (four holes, straight, 2 mm). Each group was subjected to incisal and homolateral molar region loading by a tensile materials testing machine (Monsanto Tensometer 20). Load stiffness values and peak measurements of the fracture gap distraction at the superior aspect of the mandible were measured. The mean values (±standard deviation) were derived and compared using one-way analysis of variance, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

For homolateral molar loading, statistically significant differences existed within groups (p < 0.05). For incisal edge loading, no statistically significant differences were found for stiffness among the fixation methods tested. Gap distraction at the superior aspect of the mandible was limited for three of the groups tested.

Conclusion

Under the conditions tested, the 3D square plate system provided the most favorable mechanical behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fonseca R (2005) Oral and maxillofacial trauma (ed 3). Saunders, Philadelphia 486

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prein J, Schilli W, Hammer B et al (1991) Rigid fixation of facial fractures. In: Fonseca RJ, Walker RV (eds) Oral and maxillofacial trauma. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1206–1240

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi BH, Kim KN, Kang HS (1995) Clinical and in vitro evaluation of mandibular angle fracture fixation with the two miniplate system. Oral Surg 79:692–695

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis E, Sinn D (1993) Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using two 2.4 mm dynamic compression plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:969–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis E (1993) Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using the AO reconstruction plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:2504

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis E III (1999) Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shetty V, Caputo A (1992) Biomechanical validity of the solitary lag screw technique for reducing mandibular angle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:63

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gear A, Apasova E, Schmitz J, Schubert W (2005) Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:655–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weingärtner T, Dillmann R (1997) Simulation of jaw-movements for the musculoskeletal diagnoses. Stud Health Technolog Inform 39:401–410

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haug R, Fattahi T, Goltz MA (2001) Biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1199–1210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Antoci A, Voor MJ, Seligson D et al (2004) Biomechanics of external fixation of distal extraarticular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:665–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Champy M, Lodde JP, Jaeger JH et al (1976) Mandibular osteosynthesis according to the Michelet technic. II. Presentation of new material. Results. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 77:577

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Champy M, Lodde JP, Jaeger JH et al (1976) Mandibular osteosynthesis according to the Michelet technic. I. Biomechanicalbases. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 77:569

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner WF, Neal DC, Alpert B (1979) Morbidity associated with extraoral open reduction of mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg 37:97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chuong R, Donoff RB, Guralnick WC (1983) A retrospective analysis of 327 mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Iizuka T, Lindqvist C, Hallikainen D et al (1991) Infection after rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures: a clinical and radiologic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Potter J, Ellis E (1999) Treatment of mandibular angle fractures with a malleable noncompression miniplate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57:288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kroon FH, Mathisson M, Cordey JR et al (1991) The use of miniplates in mandibular fractures. An in vitro study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 19:199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi BH, Yoo JH, Kim KN et al (1995) Stability testing of a two miniplate fixation technique for mandibular angle fractures. An in vitro study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 23:123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ellis E, Walker L (1994) Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using two noncompression miniplates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schierle HP, Schmelzeisen R, Rahn B et al (1997) One- or two-plate fixation of mandibular angle fractures? J Craniomaxillofac Surg 25:162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wittenberg J, Mukherjee D, Smith B, Kruse R (1997) Biomechanical evaluation of new fixation devices for mandibular angle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:68–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M (1977) Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand 35:297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, van der Bilt A (2000) Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent Res 79:1519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellis E, Throckmorton GS, Sinn DP (1996) Bite forces before and after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harada K, Watanabe M, Ohkura K et al (2000) Measure of bite force and occlusal contact area before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using a new pressure-sensitive device: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tate GS, Ellis E, Throckmorton GS (1994) Bite forces in patients treated for mandibular angle fractures. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 52:734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evagelos F. Kalfarentzos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalfarentzos, E.F., Deligianni, D., Mitros, G. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques for fixing mandibular angle fractures: the introduction of a new 3D plate approach. Oral Maxillofac Surg 13, 139–144 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-009-0163-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-009-0163-7

Keywords

Navigation