Skip to main content
Log in

English publication rate of 3,205 abstracts presented at the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and the Annual Research Meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Previous studies reported that the publication rate of abstracts presented at overseas meetings was around 50 %. The study objectives were to determine the rate of publication in English-language journals and the impact factor (IF) for all papers presented at the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Annual Research Meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOAR), and to compare the publication rates and IFs from abstracts accepted for oral versus poster presentations.

Methods

Titles and first authors were identified for 1,676 abstracts of free papers accepted for presentation to the JOA in 2006 and 2007, and 1,529 abstracts to the JOAR from 2006 to 2008. We identified the associated journal publications by searching PubMed, and IFs were determined using the journal citation reports. The publication rates and IFs for papers accepted for oral versus poster presentations were compared using statistical analysis.

Results

The overall publication rate was 25.5 % from the JOA and 50 % from the JOAR. There were no significant differences in yearly publication rates, or between oral and poster presentations for each year. The average IFs for all publications from the JOA was 2.45 and that from the JOAR was 3.5. There were no significant differences in yearly IFs, or between oral and poster presentations for each year (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The rate from JOAR was similar to publication rates for abstracts presented at overseas orthopedic meetings, however, the rate from JOA was half that of publication rates for abstracts presented at overseas orthopedic meetings, indicating that JOA may provide a below average contribution of new medical data to the international scientific community. No significant difference in publication rates between oral and poster presentations were found, and this suggests a need for improvement of the review system for the annual meeting and that review scores at the meetings did not predict the publication fate of abstracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;272:158–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; MR000005.

  3. Daluiski A, Kuhns CA, Jackson KR, Lieberman JR. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res. 1998;16:645–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Donegan DJ, Kim TW, Lee GC. Publication rates of presentations at an annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:1428–35.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamlet WP, Fletcher A, Meals RA. Publication patterns of papers presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1138–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Craig NJA, Lothian L, Maffulli N. Publication rate for presentations at British Orthopaedic Association meetings from 1980 to 1984 and 1990 to 1994. CME Orthop. 2001;2:40–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patel AJ, Cherian J, Fox BD, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A. Publication patterns of oral and poster presentations at the annual meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg. 2011;115:1258–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Calcagno V, Demoinet E, Gollner K, Guidi L, Ruths D, de Mazancourt C. Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns. Science. 2012;338:1065–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Okike K, Kocher MS, Nwachukwu BU, Mehlman CT, Heckman JD, Bhandari M. The fate of manuscripts rejected by the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors have nothing to acknowledge.

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive financial funding for data collection, analysis, or writing of the manuscript. The authors did not receive and will not receive any benefits or funding from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seiji Ohtori.

About this article

Cite this article

Ohtori, S., Kubota, G., Inage, K. et al. English publication rate of 3,205 abstracts presented at the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and the Annual Research Meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 18, 1031–1036 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0439-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0439-5

Keywords

Navigation