Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Favourable outcome of posterior decompression and stabilization in lordosis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the spinal cord “back shift” concept

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical management of patients with multilevel CSM aims to decompress the spinal cord and restore the normal sagittal alignment. The literature lacks of high level evidences about the best surgical approach. Posterior decompression and stabilization in lordosis allows spinal cord back shift, leading to indirect decompression of the anterior spinal cord. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of posterior decompression and stabilization in lordosis for multilevel CSM.

Methods

36 out of 40 patients were clinically assessed at a mean follow-up of 5, 7 years. Outcome measures included EMS, mJOA Score, NDI and SF-12. Patients were asked whether surgery met their expectations and if they would undergo the same surgery again. Bone graft fusion, instrumental failure and cervical curvature were evaluated. Spinal cord back shift was measured and correlation with EMS and mJOA score recovery rate was analyzed.

Results

All scores showed a significative improvement (p < 0.001), except the SF12-MCS (p > 0.05). Ninety percent of patients would undergo the same surgery again. There was no deterioration of the cervical alignment, posterior grafted bones had completely fused and there were no instrument failures. The mean spinal cord back shift was 3.9 mm (range 2.5–4.5 mm). EMS and mJOA recovery rates were significantly correlated with the postoperative posterior cord migration (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Posterior decompression and stabilization in lordosis is a valuable procedure for patients affected by multilevel CSM, leading to significant clinical improvement thanks to the spinal cord back shift. Postoperative lordotic alignment of the cervical spine is a key factor for successful treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG (2013) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 19:409–421. doi:10.1177/1073858412467377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Y, Hou Y, Yang L, Chen H, Wang X, Wu X, Gao R, Wang C, Yuan W (2012) Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques in the surgical management of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 37:E1450–E1458. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826c72b4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lawrence BD, Jacobs WB, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Chapman JR, Brodke DS (2013) Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine 38:S173–S182. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eaaf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boni M, Denaro V (1982) Surgical treatment of cervical arthrosis. Follow-up review (2–13 years) of the 1st 100 cases operated on by anterior approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:269–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boni M, Cherubino P, Denaro V, Benazzo F (1984) Multiple subtotal somatectomy. Technique and evaluation of a series of 39 cases. Spine 9:358–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boni MDGL, Denaro V (1987) CT evaluation of the multiple subtotal somatectomy results. In: Kehr P, Weidner A (eds) Cervical Spine. Springer-Verlag, Vienna, pp 124–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Denaro V (1994) Surgical management of cervical myelopathy according to the Boni-Denaro technique. In: Kehr P (ed) Rachis cervical dégénératif et traumatique, Cahiers d’enseignement de la SOFCOT. Expansion Scientifique Francaise, Paris, pp 174–182

    Google Scholar 

  8. Denaro L, D’Avella D, Denaro V (2010) Pitfalls in cervical spine surgery : avoidance and management of complications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Longo UG, Loppini M, Romeo G, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2012) Errors of level in spinal surgery: an evidence-based systematic review. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British 94:1546–1550. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.29553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herdmann JLM, Krzan M et al (1994) The European myelopathy score. In: Baucher BLBM, Klinger M (eds) Advances in neurosurgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 266–268

    Google Scholar 

  11. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T (1991) Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 4:286–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14:409–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K (1981) Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 6:354–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sodeyama T, Goto S, Mochizuki M, Takahashi J, Moriya H (1999) Effect of decompression enlargement laminoplasty for posterior shifting of the spinal cord. Spine 24:1527–1531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Z, Xue Y, He D, Tang Y, Ding H, Wang Y, Zong Y, Zhao Y (2015) Extensive laminectomy for multilevel cervical stenosis with ligamentum flavum hypertrophy: more than 10 years follow-up. Cervical Spine Res Soc 24:1605–1612. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3459-8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holly LT, Moftakhar P, Khoo LT, Shamie AN, Wang JC (2008) Surgical outcomes of elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 69:233–240. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2007.09.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tashjian VS, Kohan E, McArthur DL, Holly LT (2009) The relationship between preoperative cervical alignment and postoperative spinal cord drift after decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 72:112–117. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.02.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Masini M, Maranhao V (1997) Experimental determination of the effect of progressive sharp-angle spinal deformity on the spinal cord. Cervical Spine Res Soc 6:89–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M (2003) Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 28:1258–1262. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000065487.82469.D9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abumi K (2015) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 24(Suppl 2):186–196. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3838-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Azuchi M, Imura S (1996) Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol 243:626–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoon ST, Raich A, Hashimoto RE, Riew KD, Shaffrey CI, Rhee JM, Tetreault LA, Skelly AC, Fehlings MG (2013) Predictive factors affecting outcome after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 38:S232–S252. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu X, Min S, Zhang H, Zhou Z, Wang H, Jin A (2014) Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cervical Spine Res Soc 23:362–372. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3043-7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dahdaleh NS, Wong AP, Smith ZA, Wong RH, Lam SK, Fessler RG (2013) Microendoscopic decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus 35:E8. doi:10.3171/2013.3.FOCUS135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Trigoria, Rome, Italy

    Vincenzo Denaro, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Alessandra Berton & Giuseppe Salvatore

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, University-Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani, 5, Padua, Italy

    Luca Denaro

Authors
  1. Vincenzo Denaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Umile Giuseppe Longo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandra Berton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giuseppe Salvatore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luca Denaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Denaro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denaro, V., Longo, U.G., Berton, A. et al. Favourable outcome of posterior decompression and stabilization in lordosis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the spinal cord “back shift” concept. Eur Spine J 24 (Suppl 7), 826–831 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4298-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4298-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation