Skip to main content
Log in

Anterior surgery in selective patients with massive ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine: technical note

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

The study includes case series, technical note and review of literature.

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the radiographic indicator and the result of anterior operation for massive ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (MOPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament with an occupying ratio exceeding 50%).

Summary of background data

Anterior decompression yielded a better outcome than posterior approach in patients with MOPLL of cervical spine. But anterior surgery has the problem of technically demanding and was associated with a high incidence of surgery-related complications. Many ways for reducing the risk of anterior surgery have been reported, including floating method, employing microscopes or burrs, and laser-assisted corpectomy.

Materials and methods

A case series of selective patients with MOPLL of cervical spine undergoing anterior surgery is reported. All patients were strictly selected based on CT images with the appearance of open-base. 29 cases with more than 12 months follow-up (average, 31.0 ± 10.0 m) were reviewed. Average age at operation was 59.3 ± 8.2 years (43–73 years). Anterior decompression was done only for one or two vertebrae.

Results

One corpectomy was done in 13 cases, two corpectomies in 3 cases, and one corpectomy and one discectomy in 13 cases. Three levels were fused in 16 cases and two levels in 13 cases. No permanent neurological deterioration was observed. Neurological improvement was observed in every patients with an average improvement rate of 64 ± 23%. Mesh migration was observed in one case. A fusion rate of 100% was achieved.

Conclusion

Anterior surgery using our technique may be a relatively simple and safe procedure in selective patients with massive ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Befanger TA, Roh JS, Hanks SE, Kang JD, Emery SE, Bohlman HH (2005) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: results of anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis in sixty-one North American patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:610–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Y, Chen D, Wang X, Lu X, Guo Y, He Z, Tian H (2009) Anterior corpectomy and fusion for severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Int Orthop 33:477–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi S, Lee SH, Lee JY, Choi WG, Choi WC, Choi G, Jung B, Lee SC (2005) Factors affecting prognosis of patients who underwent corpectomy and fusion for treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: analysis of 47 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:309–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein N (1993) The surgical management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in 51 patients. J Spinal Disord 6:432–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein N (2001) Identification of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament extending through the dura on preoperative computed tomographic examinations of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:182–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fessler RG, Steck JC, Giovanini MA (1998) Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery 43:257–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hida K, Iwasaki Y, Koyanagi I, Abe H (1997) Bone window computed tomography for detection of dural defect associated with cervical ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 37:173–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K (1981) Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6:354–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Isakichi Y, keiro O (2005) Surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part A thinning and anterior floating. In: Charles RC (ed) The cervical spine, 4th edn. Lippoincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1099–1106

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K (2002) Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg 96:180–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H (2007) Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part 2: advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty. Spine 32:654–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kato Y, Iwasaki M, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Ochi T (1998) Long-term follow-up results of laminectomy for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg 89:217–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kojima T, Waga S, Kubo Y, Kanamaru K, Shimosaka S, Shimizu T (1989) Anterior cervical vertebrectomy and interbody fusion for multilevel spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurosurgery 24:864–871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee SH, Ahn Y, Lee JH (2008) Laser-assisted anterior cervical corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for cervical myelopathic patients with multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Photomed Laser Surg 26:119–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu T, Xu W, Cheng T, Yang HL (2011) Anterior versus posterior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy, which one is better? A systematic review. Eur Spine J 20(2):224–235

    Google Scholar 

  16. Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M, Mochizuki M, Moriya H (2007) An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M, Takaishi H, Hirabayashi H, Hirabayashi K (2004) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 1:168–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ono K, Ota H, Tada K, Hamada H, Takaoka K (1977) Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament: a clinicopathologic study. Spine 2:126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanford E (2005) Approach to the cervical spine: anterior versus posterior indication. In: Charles RC (ed) The cervical spine, 4th edn. Lippoincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 1083

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sasso RC, Ruggiero RA Jr, Reilly TM, Hall PV (2003) Early reconstruction failures after multilevel cervical corpectomy. Spine 28(2):140–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith MD, Bolesta MJ, Leventhal M, Bohlman HH (1992) Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistula associated with erosion of the dura. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 74:270–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sodeyama T, Goto S, Mochizuki M, Takahashi J, Moriya H (1999) Effect of decompression enlargement laminoplasty for posterior shifting of the spinal cord. Spine 24:1527–1531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tani T, Ushida T, Ishida K, Iai H, Noguchi T, Yamamoto H (2002) Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2491–2498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Scuderi GJ, Eismont FJ, McGuire RA, Singh K, Garfin SR (1998) Early failure of long segment anterior cervical plate fixation. J Spinal Disord 11(5):410–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaura I, Kurosa Y, Matuoka T, Shindo S (1999) Anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 359:27–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamazaki A, Homma T, Uchiyama S, Katsumi Y, Okumura H (1999) Morphologic limitations of posterior decompression by midsagittal splitting method for myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Spine 24:32–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K (1991) Neurological complications of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 16:1277–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen Yuan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X., Chen, D., Yuan, W. et al. Anterior surgery in selective patients with massive ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine: technical note. Eur Spine J 21, 314–321 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1996-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1996-y

Keywords

Navigation