Skip to main content
Log in

Pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Pedicle screw instrumentation in AIS has advantages of rigid fixation, improved deformity correction and a shorter fusion, but needs an exacting technique.

Materials and methods

The author has been using the K-wire method with intraoperative single PA and lateral radiographs, because it is safe, accurate and fast. Pedicle screws are inserted in every segment on the correction side (thoracic concave) and every 2–3 on the supportive side (thoracic convex). After an over-bent rod is inserted on the corrective side, the rod is rotated 90° counterclockwise. This maneuver corrects the coronal and sagittal curves. Then the vertebra is derotated by direct vertebral rotation (DVR) correcting the rotational deformity. The direction of DVR should be opposite to that of the vertebral rotation. A rigid rod has to be used to prevent the rod from straightening out during the rod derotation and DVR. The ideal classification of AIS should address all curve patterns, predicts accurate fusion extent and have good inter/intraobserver reliability. The Suk classification matches the ideal classification is simple and memorable, and has only four structural curve patterns; single thoracic, double thoracic, double major and thoracolumbar/lumbar. Each curve has two types, A and B. When using pedicle screws in thoracic AIS, curves are usually fused from upper neutral to lower neutral vertebra. Identification of the end vertebra and the neutral vertebra is important in deciding the fusion levels and the direction of DVR. In lumbar AIS, fusion is performed from upper neutral vertebra to L3 or L4 depending on its curve types.

Conclusions

Rod derotation and DVR using pedicle screw instrumentation give true three dimensional deformity correction in the treatment of AIS. Suk classification with these methods predicts exact fusion extent and is easy to understand and remember.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harrington PR (1962) Treatment of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44:591–610

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein LA (1969) Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis by Harrington instrumentation and fusion with fresh autogenous iliac bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:209–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. King H, Moe JH, Bradford DS et al (1983) The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1302–1313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ et al (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1399–1405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM et al (2001) Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine 26:2049–2057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boucher HH (1959) A method of spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 41:248–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C (1986) Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop 203:7–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M (1988) New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 227:10–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ et al (1994) Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 18:341–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liljenqvist UR, Halm HF, Link TM (1997) Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 22:2239–2245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V (1993) Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation: a selected survey of ABS members. Spine 18:2231–2239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown CA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (1998) Complications of pedicle thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws. Spine 23:1566–1571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH et al (1999) Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1519–1528

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenke LG, Edwards CC II, Bridwell KH (2003) The Lenke classification adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine. Spine 28:S199–S207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2004) Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 29:333–342

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wong CC, Ting F, Wong B et al (2005) Accuracy of the funnel technique of thoracic pedicle in scoliosis surgery––an evaluation by CT-scans. Med J Malaysia 60S:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  17. Di Silvestre M, Parisini P, Lolli F et al (2007) Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment. Spine 32:1655–1661

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suk SI, Kim WJ (1998) Pedicle screw fixation for thoracic scoliosis. In: Brown CW (ed) Spinal instrumentation techniques. Scoliosis Research Society, Rosemont

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suk SI, Cha SI, Lee CK et al (1995) A study on the pullout strength of pedicle screws in relation to the size of the drill holes and inserted screws. Presented at the 30th annual meeting of the scoliosis research society, Asheville, NC

  20. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doomik A et al (1987) Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 12:160–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL et al (1989) Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 14:367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Suk SI, Lee JH (1994) A study of the diameter and change of the vertebral pedicle after screw insertion. Presented at third intermeeting SIROT, Boston, Massachusetts

  23. Bridwell KH, McAllister JW, Betz RR et al (1991) Coronal decompensation produced by Cotrel–Dubousset “derotation” maneuver for idiopathic right thoracic scoliosis. Spine 16:769–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C et al (1995) Preoperative three-dimensional correction of idiopathic scoliosis with the Cotrel-Dubousset procedure. Spine 20:1406–1409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Kim JH et al (1999) Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in the hypokyphotic spine: a comparison between multiple-hook and segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 12:489–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER (2004) Direct vertebral rotation: A new technique of three-dimensionaldeformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Bridwell KH et al (1999) Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:1663–1671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shufflebarger HL, Clark CE (1990) Fusion levels and hook patterns in thoracic scoliosis with Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 15:916–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Marguilis JY, Floman Y, Robin GC et al (1998) An algorithm for selection of instrumentation levels in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7:88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER et al (2003) Determination of distal fusion level with segmental pedicle screw fixation in single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28:484–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arlet V, Marchesi D, Papin P et al (2000) Decompensation following scoliosis surgery: treatment by decreasing the correction of the main thoracic curve or “letting the spine go”. Eur Spine J 9:156–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee CK, Denis F, Winter RB et al (1993) Analysis of upper thoracic curve in surgically treated idiopathic scoliosis: a new concept of double thoracic curve pattern. Spine 18:1599–1608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, O’Brien MF et al (1994) Recognition and treatment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 19:1589–1597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Winter RB, Denis F (1994) The King type V curve pattern. Its analysis and surgical treatment. Orthop Clin North Am 25:353–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee CS et al (2000) Indications of proximal thoracic curve fusion in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 25:2342–2349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Suk SI, Lee CK, Chung SS (1994) Comparison of Zielke ventral derotation system and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis. Spine 19:419–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Se-Il Suk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suk, SI., Kim, JH., Kim, SS. et al. Pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Eur Spine J 21, 13–22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1986-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1986-0

Keywords

Navigation