Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A matched case–control comparison of hospital costs and outcomes for knee replacement patients admitted postoperatively to acute care versus rehabilitation

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For select total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, we have established an alternative pathway to bypass the acute care surgical ward and directly admit patients from the post-anesthesia care unit to on-campus rehabilitation. We retrospectively examined whether this ‘fast track’ pathway decreased costs and improved patient outcomes. After reviewing records of consecutive primary unilateral TKA patients over a 15-month period, each patient admitted to rehabilitation was matched with a control admitted to the acute care ward. The primary outcome was estimated total hospitalization cost (length of stay in days multiplied by the average cost per day). Secondary outcomes were length of stay, in-hospital pain scores, opioid use, maximum ambulatory distance and 30-day readmission, morbidity, and mortality. Of the 262 TKA patients during the study period, 14 were admitted to rehabilitation and were matched to 14 patients admitted to acute care. Estimated total hospitalization cost [median (10th–90th percentiles)] was US$30,755 (US$23,066–38,444) for ward patients compared to US$17,620 (US$13,215–33,918) for rehabilitation patients (P = 0.006). This difference [mean (95% CI)] was US$10,143 (US$2174–18,112). There were no other differences. For facilities similar to ours, direct postoperative admission of select TKA patients to subacute rehabilitation may be less costly than acute care and may not negatively affect outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Laucis NC, Chowdhury M, Dasgupta A, Bhattacharyya T. Trend toward high-volume hospitals and the influence on complications in knee and hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:707–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. HCUP projections: mobility/orthopedic procedures 2003 to 2012. In: HCUP projections report # 2012–03. Online 20 September 2012. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012, pp. 1–110.

  3. Walters TL, Howard SK, Kou A, Bertaccini EJ, Harrison TK, Kim TE, Shafer A, Brun C, Funck N, Siegel LC, Stary E, Mariano ER. Design and implementation of a perioperative surgical home at a veterans affairs hospital. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;20:133–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mariano ER, Walters TL, Kim TE, Kain ZN. Why the perioperative surgical home makes sense for veterans affairs health care. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:1163–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mudumbai SC, Walters TL, Howard SK, Kim TE, Lochbaum GM, Memtsoudis SG, Kain ZN, Kou A, King R, Mariano ER. The perioperative surgical home model facilitates change implementation in anesthetic technique within a clinical pathway for total knee arthroplasty. Healthc (Amst). 2016;4:334–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hebl JR, Kopp SL, Ali MH, Horlocker TT, Dilger JA, Lennon RL, Williams BA, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW. A comprehensive anesthesia protocol that emphasizes peripheral nerve blockade for total knee and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(Suppl 2):63–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Webb CA, Mariano ER. Best multimodal analgesic protocol for total knee arthroplasty. Pain Manag. 2015;5:185–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thienpont E, Lavand’homme P, Kehlet H. The constraints on day-case total knee arthroplasty: the fastest fast track. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(10 Suppl A):40–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Crawford DC, Li CS, Sprague S, Bhandari M. Clinical and cost implications of inpatient versus outpatient orthopedic surgeries: a systematic review of the published literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2015;7:6177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolisek FR, McGrath MS, Jessup NM, Monesmith EA, Mont MA. Comparison of outpatient versus inpatient total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1438–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger RA, Sanders S, D’Ambrogio E, Buchheit K, Deirmengian C, Paprosky W, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG. Minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing TKA: results of a comprehensive pathway for outpatient TKA. J Knee Surg. 2006;19:145–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991–2010. JAMA. 2012;308:1227–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mantilla CB, Horlocker TT, Schroeder DR, Berry DJ, Brown DL. Frequency of myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, and death following primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1140–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ilfeld BM, Mariano ER, Williams BA, Woodard JN, Macario A. Hospitalization costs of total knee arthroplasty with a continuous femoral nerve block provided only in the hospital versus on an ambulatory basis: a retrospective, case–control, cost-minimization analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:46–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Mr. Robert Chang from the Managerial Cost Accounting Program and Ms. Debbie Cheng from the Social Work Service at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System for their help with this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward R. Mariano.

Ethics declarations

Financial support

None.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Mariano has received unrestricted educational program funding paid to his institution from Halyard Health (Alpharetta, GA, USA) and B. Braun (Bethlehem, PA, USA). Dr. Memtsoudis has received a one-time consultation fee from HappyMed (Vienna, Austria). These companies had no input into any aspect of the present study design and implementation, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and manuscript preparation. None of the other authors has any personal financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Congress presentation(s): 42nd Annual Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine Meeting and Workshops (San Francisco, CA, USA, 6−8 April 2017).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tse, B.K., Walters, T.L., Howard, S.K. et al. A matched case–control comparison of hospital costs and outcomes for knee replacement patients admitted postoperatively to acute care versus rehabilitation. J Anesth 31, 785–788 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-017-2372-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-017-2372-9

Keywords

Navigation