Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of divided supplementation of remifentanil on seizure duration and hemodynamic responses during electroconvulsive therapy under propofol anesthesia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although a reduced dose of propofol combined with remifentanil is often used in anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), there have been few studies in which the optimal technique for injection of remifentanil was examined in detail. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of single and divided injection of remifentanil combined with propofol on seizure duration and hemodynamic responses during ECT.

Methods

Twenty-six ASA I–II patients were enrolled in this study and received a total of 78 ECTs. Each patient received propofol 1.2 mg/kg (group P), remifentanil 1 μg/kg followed by propofol 0.5 mg/kg (group R1), and remifentanil 1 μg/kg followed by propofol 0.5 mg/kg and thereafter remifentanil 2 μg/kg (group R2). Succinylcholine 1 mg/kg was used for muscle paralysis after loss of consciousness.

Results

Although mean motor seizure durations were significantly longer in groups R1 and R2 than in group P (P < 0.05), they were similar in groups R1 and R2. Although the percentage increases in mean arterial pressure after ECT were significantly smaller in groups P (P < 0.01) and R2 (P < 0.05) than in group R1, they did not significantly differ between groups P and R2.

Conclusions

Divided use of remifentanil at 1 and 2 μg/kg combined with propofol 0.5 mg/kg produces an acceptable outcome in both seizure duration and hemodynamic stability during ECT compared with the standard hypnotic doses of propofol alone or remifentanil 1 μg/kg followed by propofol 0.5 mg/kg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rampton AJ, Griffin RM, Stuart CS, Durcan JJ, Huddy NC, Abbott MA. Comparison of methohexitone and propofol for electroconvulsive therapy: effects on hemodynamic responses and seizure duration. Anesthesiology. 1989;70:412–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simpson KH, Halsall PJ, Carr CME, Stewart KG. Propofol reduces seizure duration in patients having anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy. Br J Anaesth. 1988;61:343–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Avramov MN, Husain MM, White PF. The comparative effects of methohexitone, propofol, and etomidate for electroconvulsive therapy. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:596–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fink M. What is adequate treatment in convulsion therapy? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991;84:424–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hass S, Nash K, Lippmann SB. ECT-induced seizure duration. J Ky Med Assoc. 1996;94:233–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Milne SE, Kenny GN, Schraag S. Propofol sparing effect of remifentanil using closed-loop anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:623–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mertens MJ, Olofsen E, Engbers FH, Burm AG, Bovill JG, Vuyk J. Propofol reduces perioperative remifentanil requirements in a synergistic manner: response surface modeling of perioperative remifentanil-propofol interactions. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:347–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maletzki BM. Seizure duration and clinical effect in electroconvulsive therapy. Compr Psychiatry. 1978;19:541–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersen FA, Arsland D, Holst-Larsen H. Effects of combined methohexitone–remifentanil anaesthesia in electroconvulsive therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:830–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ding Z, White PF. Anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1351–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fredman B, d’Etienne J, Smith I, Husain MM, White PF. Anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy: effects of propofol and methohexital on seizure activity and recovery. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:75–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Akcaboy ZN, Akcaboy EY, Yigitbasi B, Bayam G, Dikmen B, Gogus N, Dilbaz N. Effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on seizure duration, stimulus amplitudes and recovery parameters during ECT. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:1068–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vishne T, Aronov S, Amiaz R, Etchin A, Grunhaus L. Remifentanil supplementation of propofol during electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT. 2005;21:235–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Recart A, Rawal S, White PF, Byerly S, Thornton L. The effect of remifentanil on seizure duration and acute hemodynamic responses to electroconvulsive therapy. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1047–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Zijl DH, Gordon PC, James MF. The comparative effects of remifentanil or magnesium sulfate versus placebo on attenuating the hemodynamic responses after electroconvulsive therapy. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1651–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kapila A, Glass PSA, Jacobs JR, Muir KT, Hermann DJ, Shiraishi M, Howell S, Smith RL. Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:968–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith DL, Angst MS, Brock-Utne JG, DeBattista C. Seizure duration with remifentanil/methohexital vs. methohexital alone in middle-aged patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47:1064–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Glass PSA, Hardman D, Kamiyama Y, Quill TJ, Marton G, Donn KH, Grosse CM, Hermann D. Preliminary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an ultra-short acting opioid: remifentanil (GI87084B). Anesth Analg. 1993;77:1031–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson BF. Relation of heart rate and systolic blood pressure to the onset of pain in angina pectoris. Circulation. 1967;35:1073–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gobel FL, Nordstrom LA, Nelson RR, Jorgensen CR, Wang Y. The rate-pressure product as an index of myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise in patients with angina pectoris. Circulation. 1978;57:549–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldman L, Caldera DL. Risks of general anesthesia and elective operation in the hypertensive patient. Anesthesiology. 1979;50:285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kohki Nishikawa.

About this article

Cite this article

Nishikawa, K., Higuchi, M., Kawagishi, T. et al. Effect of divided supplementation of remifentanil on seizure duration and hemodynamic responses during electroconvulsive therapy under propofol anesthesia. J Anesth 25, 29–33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-1049-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-1049-4

Keywords

Navigation