Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic duodenal–jejunal bypass liner prototype in severe or morbidly obese subjects implanted for up to 3 years

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The duodenal–jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopic device that mimics the duodenal–jejunal exclusion component of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Previous studies assessing the efficacy of the DJBL have shown 10-40% excess weight loss (%EWL) and improvements in obesity-associated comorbidities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new DJBL prototype over a 3-year period.

Methods

Morbidly obese subjects were enrolled in a single-arm, open-label, prospective trial. The subjects were offered the opportunity to continue with the trial annually and signed a new consent form. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints were changes in weight and biochemical parameters from baseline.

Results

The DJBL was implanted endoscopically in 80 subjects (age: 35±10 years; 69% female; weight: 109±17 kg; BMI: 42±5.4 kg/m2). Seventy-two severe adverse events (AEs) were observed in 55 patients (68%), of which nine subjects required a prolonged hospital stay and three subjects required major interventions. Overall, 23 subjects (29%) underwent early device removal due to AEs. Additionally, 95% of the patients experienced mild AEs that mainly consisted of abdominal pain. The severe AEs included a liver abscess (3), upper GI bleeding (4), cholangitis (1), and acute pancreatitis (1) and mostly occurred after 12 months of follow-up. Two patients presented a short esophageal perforation during explantation. These perforations were successfully managed with endoscopic closure in one subject and medical treatment in the other subject. In the completer population at 52 weeks (71 patients), 104 weeks (40 patients), and 156 weeks (11 patients), the mean %EWL were 44 ± 16, 40 ± 22, and 39 ± 20, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study shows significant and sustained weight loss after 3 years of treatment with the new DJBL. However, the high frequency and severity of AEs preclude the use of this prototype for periods longer than 1 year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB, Kipnis V, Mouw T, Ballard-Barbash R, Hollenbeck A, Leitzmann MF (2006) Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med 355(8):763–778. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa055643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freedman DM, Ron E, Ballard-Barbash R, Doody MM, Linet MS (2006) Body mass index and all-cause mortality in a nationwide US cohort. Int J Obes 30(5):822–829. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N (2015) Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg 25(10):1822–1832. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marcotte E, Chand B (2016) Management and prevention of surgical and nutritional complications after bariatric surgery. Surg Clin N Am 96(4):843–856. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2016.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pitzul KB, Jackson T, Crawford S, Kwong JC, Sockalingam S, Hawa R, Urbach D, Okrainec A (2014) Understanding disposition after referral for bariatric surgery: when and why patients referred do not undergo surgery. Obes Surg 24(1):134–140. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1083-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rohde U, Hedback N, Gluud LL, Vilsboll T, Knop FK (2016) Effect of the EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner on obesity and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 18(3):300–305. doi:10.1111/dom.12603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fishman E, Melanson D, Lamport R, Levine A (2008) A novel endoscopic delivery system for placement of a duodenal-jejunal implant for the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:2501–2503. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Escalona A, Pimentel F, Sharp A, Becerra P, Slako M, Turiel D, Munoz R, Bambs C, Guzman S, Ibanez L, Gersin K (2012) Weight loss and metabolic improvement in morbidly obese subjects implanted for 1 year with an endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner. Ann Surg 255(6):1080–1085. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825498c4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schouten R, Rijs CS, Bouvy ND, Hameeteman W, Koek GH, Janssen IM, Greve JW (2010) A multicenter, randomized efficacy study of the Endobarrier gastrointestinal liner for presurgical weight loss prior to bariatric surgery. Ann Surg 251(2):236–243. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bdfbff

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Dahlgren S, Larsson B, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Sullivan M, Wedel H, Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Eng J Med 351(26):2683–2693. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa035622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Unick JL, Beavers D, Bond DS, Clark JM, Jakicic JM, Kitabchi AE, Knowler WC, Wadden TA, Wagenknecht LE, Wing RR, Look ARG (2013) The long-term effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention in severely obese individuals. Am J Med 126(3):236–242. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.10.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gersin KS, Rothstein RI, Rosenthal RJ, Stefanidis D, Deal SE, Kuwada TS, Laycock W, Adrales G, Vassiliou M, Szomstein S, Heller S, Joyce AM, Heiss F, Nepomnayshy D (2010) Open-label, sham-controlled trial of an endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass liner for preoperative weight loss in bariatric surgery candidates. Gastrointest Endosc 71(6):976–982. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boza C, Gamboa C, Perez G, Crovari F, Escalona A, Pimentel F, Raddatz A, Guzman S, Ibanez L (2011) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): surgical results and 5-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 25(1):292–297. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1176-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pekkarinen T, Mustonen H, Sane T, Jaser N, Juuti A, Leivonen M (2016) Long-term effect of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on severe obesity: do preoperative weight loss and binge eating behavior predict the outcome of bariatric surgery? Obes Surg. doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2090-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2016: summary of revisions (2016). Diabetes care 39 Suppl 1:S4-5. doi:10.2337/dc16-S003

Download references

Funding

GI Dynamics supported this trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolás Quezada.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Nicolás Quezada, Rodrigo Muñoz, Carla Morelli, Dannae Turiel, Julián Hernández, Fernando Pimentel, and Alex Escalona have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quezada, N., Muñoz, R., Morelli, C. et al. Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic duodenal–jejunal bypass liner prototype in severe or morbidly obese subjects implanted for up to 3 years. Surg Endosc 32, 260–267 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5672-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5672-0

Keywords

Navigation