Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic muscularis dissection for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Based on our experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and new endoscopic techniques for endoscopic closure of iatrogenic upper gastrointestinal (upper-GI) perforations, we developed methods to remove upper-GI subepithelial tumors (SETs) originating from the muscularis propria by endoscopic muscularis dissection (EMD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical feasibility and safety of EMD.

Methods

31 patients with upper-GI SETs originating from the muscularis propria were treated by EMD. The EMD differed from ESD in (1) precutting the overlying mucosa above the lesion by using snare or longitudinal incision instead of circumferential incision, (2) dissecting the complete tumors away from submucosal and muscularis propria tissue by electrical dissection combined with blunt dissection, and (3) closing the wound with clips. Perforations occurring during dissection were closed by endoscopic methods.

Results

30 of 31 tumors were resected completely (96.8 %). One esophageal lesion was resected partially because of severe adhesions with surrounding tissue. Mean resected tumor size was 22.1 mm × 15.5 mm, and mean operation time was 76.8 min (range 15–330 min). Histological diagnosis was gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in 16 lesions [6 esophageal, 3 cardial, 7 gastric; 6 very low risk and 10 low risk according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) risk classification] and leiomyoma in 15 lesions (8 esophageal, 4 cardial, 3 gastric). No patient developed delayed hemorrhage. Perforation occurred in four patients (12.9 %), all of which were managed successfully by endoscopic techniques. The mean follow-up time was 17.7 months (range 7–35 months). Follow-up found no tumor recurrence in any patient.

Conclusions

In this early experience, EMD appears to be a feasible and minimally invasive treatment for some patients with upper-GI SETs originating from the muscularis propria. Although there is a higher risk of perforation than with ESD, this will improve with extended practice, and perforations have become manageable endoscopically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kawamoto K, Yamada Y, Furukawa N, Utsunomiya T, Haraguchi Y, Mizuguchi M, Oiwa T, Takano H, Masuda K (1997) Endoscopic submucosal tumorectomy for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors restricted to the submucosa: a new form of endoscopic minimal surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 46:311–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hyun JH, Jeen YT, Chun HJ, Lee HS, Lee SW, Song CW, Choi JH, Um SH, Kim CD, Ryu HS (1997) Endoscopic resection of submucosal tumor of the esophagus: results in 62 patients. Endoscopy 29:165–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Connolly EM, Gaffney E, Reynolds JV (2003) Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 90:1178–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee IL, Lin PY, Tung SY, Shen CH, Wei KL, Wu CS (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of intraluminal gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Endoscopy 38:1024–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bialek A, Wiechowska-Kozlowska A, Huk J (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large gastric stromal tumor arising from muscularis propria. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:e119–e120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Raju GS (2009) Endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal leaks. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1315–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Costamagna G, Marchese M (2010) Management of esophageal perforation after therapeutic endoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:391–392

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mangiavillano B, Viaggi P, Masci E (2010) Endoscopic closure of acute iatrogenic perforations during diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract using metallic clips: a literature review. J Dig Dis 11:12–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Madanick RD (2008) Medical management of iatrogenic esophageal perforations. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 11:54–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishida T, Hirota S, Yanagisawa A, Sugino Y, Minami M, Yamamura Y, Otani Y, Shimada Y, Takahashi F, Kubota T, GIST Guideline Subcommittee (2008) Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan: English version. Int J Clin Oncol 13:416–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy P, Boci K, Charbonneau C (2007) The epidemiologic, health-related quality of life, and economic burden of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. J Clin Pharm Ther 32:557–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sepe PS, Brugge WR (2009) A guide for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:363–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kojima T, Takahashi H, Parra-Blanco A, Kohsen K, Fujita R (1999) Diagnosis of submucosal tumor of the upper GI tract by endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 50:516–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang JC, Kim JH, Kim JH, Shin SJ, Cheong JY, Lee KM, Yoo BM, Lee KJ, Cho SW (2009) Endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric subepithelial tumors originated from the muscularis propria layer. Hepatogastroenterology 56:1281–1286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tamiya Y, Nakahara K, Kominato K, Serikawa O, Watanabe Y, Tateishi H, Takedatsu H, Toyonaga A, Sata M (2010) Pneumomediastinum is a frequent but minor complication during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 42:8–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC (2004) Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1475–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka M, Ono H, Hasuike N, Takizawa K (2008) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. Digestion 77(Suppl 1):23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Farhat S, Chaussade S, Ponchon T, Coumaros D, Charachon A, Barrioz T, Koch S, Houcke P, Cellier C, Heresbach D, Lepilliez V, Napoleon B, Bauret P, Coron E, Le Rhun M, Bichard P, Vaillant E, Calazel A, Bensoussan E, Bellon S, Mangialavori L, Robin F, Prat F, SFED ESD study group (2011) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development. Endoscopy 43:664–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van Heel NC, Haringsma J, Spaander MC, Bruno MJ, Kuipers EJ (2010) Short-term esophageal stenting in the management of benign perforations. Am J Gastroenterol 105:1515–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt SC, Strauch S, Rösch T, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Jonas S, Pratschke J, Weidemann H, Neuhaus P, Schumacher G (2010) Management of esophageal perforations. Surg Endosc 24:2809–2813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Amrani L, Ménard C, Berdah S, Emungania O, Soune PA, Subtil C, Brunet C, Grimaud JC, Barthet M (2009) From iatrogenic digestive perforation to complete anastomotic disunion: endoscopic stenting as a new concept of “stent-guided regeneration and re-epithelialization”. Gastrointest Endosc 69:1282–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Binmoeller KF, Grimm H, Soehendra N (1993) Endoscopic closure of a perforation using metallic clips after snare excision of a gastric leiomyoma. Gastrointest Endosc 39:172–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Grupka MJ, Benson J (2008) Endoscopic clipping. J Dig Dis 9:72–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raju GS, Gajula L (2004) Endoclips for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 59:267–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grotz TE, Donohue JH (2011) Surveillance strategies for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Surg Oncol 104:921–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Joensuu H (2008) Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol 39:1411–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Raut CP, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Sundar HM, Trent JC, Wayne JD (2010) NCCN Task Force report:updateon the managementof patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8:S1–S41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Takahashi T, Nakajima K, Nishitani A, Souma Y, Hirota S, Sawa Y, Nishida T (2007) An enhanced risk-group stratification system for more practical prognostication of clinically malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Clin Oncol 12:369–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kingham TP, DeMatteo RP (2009) Multidisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Clin North Am 89:217–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Authors Bing-Rong Liu, Ji-Tao Song, Bo Qu, Ji-Feng Wen, Ji-Bin Yin, and Wei Liu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing-Rong Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, BR., Song, JT., Qu, B. et al. Endoscopic muscularis dissection for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 26, 3141–3148 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2305-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2305-5

Keywords

Navigation