Skip to main content
Log in

Combined Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and Traditional Swallowing Rehabilitation in the Treatment of Stroke-Related Dysphagia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dysphagia is common after stroke. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) for the treatment of dysphagia have gained in popularity, but the combined application of these promising modalities has rarely been studied. We aimed to evaluate whether combined NMES, FEES, and traditional swallowing rehabilitation can improve swallowing functions in stroke patients with moderate to severe dysphagia. Thirty-two patients with moderate to severe dysphagia poststroke (≥3 weeks) were recruited. Patients received 12 sessions of NMES for 1 h/day, 5 days/week within a period of 2–3 weeks. FEES was done before and after NMES for evaluation and to guide dysphagic therapy. All patients subsequently received 12 sessions of traditional swallowing rehabilitation (50 min/day, 3 days/week) for 4 weeks. Primary outcome measure was the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Secondary outcome measures included clinical degree of dysphagia, the patient’s self-perception of swallowing ability, and the patient’s global satisfaction with therapy. Patients were assessed at baseline, after NMES, at 6-month follow-up, and at 2-year follow-up. Twenty-nine patients completed the study. FOIS, degree of dysphagia, and patient’s self-perception of swallowing improved significantly after NMES, at the 6-month follow-up, and at the 2-year follow-up (p < 0.001, each compared with baseline). Most patients reported considerable satisfaction with no serious adverse events. Twenty-three of the 29 (79.3 %) patients maintained oral diet with no pulmonary complications at 2-year follow-up. This preliminary case series demonstrated that combined NMES, FEES, and traditional swallowing rehabilitation showed promise for improving swallowing functions in stroke patients with moderate-to-severe dysphagia. The benefits were maintained for up to 2 years. The results are promising enough to justify further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing disorders following acute stroke: prevalence and diagnostic accuracy. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10:380–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smithard DG, O’Neill PA, England RE, et al. The natural history of dysphagia following a stroke. Dysphagia. 1997;12:188–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Teasell RW, Bach D, McRae M. Prevalence and recovery of aspiration poststroke: a retrospective analysis. Dysphagia. 1994;9:35–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dziewas R, Ritter M, Schilling M, et al. Pneumonia in acute stroke patients fed by nasogastric tube. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:852–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Geeganage C, Beavan J, Ellender S et al. Interventions for dysphagia and nutritional support in acute and subacute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:CD000323.

  6. Merletti R, Zelaschi F, Latella D, Galli M, Angeli S, Bellucci Sessa M. A control study of muscle force recovery in hemiparetic patients during treatment with functional electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987;10:147–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hainaut K, Duchateau J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary exercise. Sports Med. 1992;14:100–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Freed ML, Freed L, Chatburn RL, Christian M. Electrical stimulation for swallowing disorders caused by stroke. Respir Care. 2001;46:466–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lake DA. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation. An overview, and its application in the treatment of sports injuries. Sports Med. 1992;13:320–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulow M, Speyer R, Baijens L, Woisard V, Ekberg O. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in stroke patients with oral and pharyngeal dysfunction. Dysphagia. 2008;23:302–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carnaby-Mann GD, Crary MA. Adjunctive neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treatment-refractory dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117:279–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamdy S, Rothwell JC, Aziz Q, Thompson DG. Organization and reorganization of human swallowing motor cortex: implications for recovery after stroke. Clin Sci. 2000;99:151–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fraser C, Rothwell J, Power M, Hobson A, Thompson D, Hamdy S. Differential changes in human pharyngoesophageal motor excitability induced by swallowing, pharyngeal stimulation, and anesthesia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;285:137–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carnaby-Mann GD, Crary MA. Examining the evidence on neuromuscular electrical stimulation for swallowing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133:564–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2:216–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Langmore SE, McCulloch TM. Examination of the pharynx and larynx and endoscopic examination of pharyngeal swallowing. In: Perlman A, Shulze C, editors. Deglutition and its disorders. San Diego: Singular Publishing; 1996. p. 201–26.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Langmore SE. Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. New York: Thieme; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leder SB. Serial fiberoptic endoscopic swallowing evaluations in the management of patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1264–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Crary MA, Carnaby Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1516–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludlow CL, Humbert I, Saxon K, Poletto C, Sonies B, Crujido L. Effects of surface electrical stimulation both at rest and during swallowing in chronic pharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2007;22:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Freed M, Wijting Y. VitalStim Certification Program. Training manual for patient assessment, treatment using VitalStim electrical stimulation. Hixson: Chattanooga Group; 2003.

  22. Erketin C, Aydogdu I, Tarlaci S, Turman AB, Kiylioglu N. Mechanism of dysphagia in suprabulbar palsy with lacunar infarct. Stroke. 2000;31:1370–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing function after stroke. Prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke. 1999;30:744–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin L, Cometti G, Pousson M, Morlon B. Effect of electrical stimulation training on the contractile characteristics of the triceps surae muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1993;67:457–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leelamanit V, Limsakul C, Geater A. Synchronized electrical stimulation in treating pharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:2204–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oh BM, Kim DY, Paik NJ. Recovery of swallowing function is accompanied by the expansion of the cortical map. Int J Neurosci. 2007;117:1215–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Snyder-Mackler L, Delitto A, Bailey SL, Stralka SW. Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of electrical stimulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1166–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. DeKroon JR, Ijzermann MJ, Chae J, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaw GY, Sechtem PR, Searl J, Keller K, Rawi TA, Dowdy E. Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (VitalStim) curative therapy for severe dysphagia: myth or reality? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;116:36–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Halper A, Cherney L, Cichowski K, Zhang M. Dysphagia after head trauma: The effects of cognitive-communicative impairments on functional outcomes. J Head Trauma. 1999;14:489–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an academic research fund from Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (VGHKS96-079). The study is registered in http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT01731847).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu-Fen Sun.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 6.

Table 6 Functional Oral Intake Scale and degree of dysphagia

Appendix 2

See Table 7.

Table 7 Scores for fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, SF., Hsu, CW., Lin, HS. et al. Combined Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and Traditional Swallowing Rehabilitation in the Treatment of Stroke-Related Dysphagia. Dysphagia 28, 557–566 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9466-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9466-9

Keywords

Navigation