Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Randomized Study Comparing the Shaker Exercise with Traditional Therapy: A Preliminary Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seven institutions participated in this small clinical trial that included 19 patients who exhibited oropharyngeal dysphagia on videofluorography (VFG) involving the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and who had a 3-month history of aspiration. All patients were randomized to either traditional swallowing therapy or the Shaker exercise for 6 weeks. Each patient received a modified barium swallow pre- and post-therapy, including two swallows each of 3 ml and 5 ml liquid barium and 3 ml barium pudding. Each videofluorographic study was sent to a central laboratory and digitized in order to measure hyoid and larynx movement as well as UES opening. Fourteen patients received both pre-and post-therapy VFG studies. There was significantly less aspiration post-therapy in patients in the Shaker group. Residue in the various oral and pharyngeal locations did not differ between the groups. With traditional therapy, there were several significant increases from pre- to post-therapy, including superior laryngeal movement and superior hyoid movement on 3-ml pudding swallows and anterior laryngeal movement on 3-ml liquid boluses, indicating significant improvement in swallowing physiology. After both types of therapy there is a significant increase in UES opening width on 3-ml paste swallows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook IJ, Dodds WJ, Dantas RO, Massey B, Kern MK, Lang IM, et al. Opening mechanisms of the human upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol. 1989;257(5 Pt 1):G748–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacob P, Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA, Shah V, Ha T. Upper esophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowing. Gastroenterology. 1989;97(6):1469–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Logemann JA, Shaker R. Upper esophageal sphincter function during deglutition. Gastroenterology. 1988;95(1):52–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lang IM, Shaker R. An update on the physiology of the components of the upper esophageal sphincter. Dysphagia. 1994;9(4):229–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaker R, Kern M, Bardan E, Taylor A, Stewart ET, Hoffmann RG, et al. Augmentation of deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter opening in the elderly by exercise. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(6 Pt 1):G1518–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaker R, Easterling C, Kern M, Nitschke T, Massey B, Daniels S, et al. Rehabilitation of swallowing by exercise in tube-fed patients with pharyngeal dysphagia secondary to abnormal UES opening. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(5):1314–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Colangelo LA. Super-supraglottic swallow in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1998;19(6):535–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin BJW, Logemann JA, Shaker R, Dodds WJ. Normal laryngeal valving patterns during three breath hold maneuvers: a pilot investigation. Dysphagia. 1993;8:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohmae Y, Logemann JA, Kaiser P, Hanson DG, Kahrilas PJ. Effects of two breath-holding maneuvers on oropharyngeal swallow. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105:123–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohmae Y, Ogura M, Taraho T, Kitahara S, Inouye T. Effects of head rotation on pharyngeal function during normal swallow. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998;107:344–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA, Krugler C, Flanagan E. Volitional augmentation of upper esophageal sphincter opening during swallowing. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(3 Pt 1):G450–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lazarus C, Logemann JA, Gibbons P. Effects of maneuvers on swallowing function in a dysphagic oral cancer patient. Head Neck. 1993;15:419–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ. Relearning to swallow post CVA: application of maneuvers and indirect biofeedback: a case study. Neurology. 1990;40:1136–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Veis S, Logemann JA, Colangelo LA. Effects of three techniques on maximum posterior movement of tongue base. Dysphagia. 2000;15:142–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dodds WJ, Logemann JA, Stewart ET. Radiologic assessment of abnormal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(5):965–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Logemann JA. A manual for videofluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing, 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. List MA, Ritter-Sterr C, Lansky SB. A performance status for head and neck cancer patients. Cancer. 1990;66:564–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Easterling C, Grande B, Kern M, Sears K, Shaker R. Attaining and maintaining isometric and isokinetic goals of the Shaker exercise. Dysphagia. 2005;20:133–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reimers-Neils L, Logemann JA, Larson C. Viscosity effects on EMG activity in normal swallow. Dysphagia. 1994;9:101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeri A. Logemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Logemann, J.A., Rademaker, A., Pauloski, B.R. et al. A Randomized Study Comparing the Shaker Exercise with Traditional Therapy: A Preliminary Study. Dysphagia 24, 403–411 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9217-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9217-0

Keywords

Navigation